Mass of components and material distribution in lateral flow assay kits.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bulletin of the World Health Organization Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.2471/BLT.24.292167
Marie-Louise Wöhrle, Alice Street, Maïwenn Kersaudy-Kerhoas
{"title":"Mass of components and material distribution in lateral flow assay kits.","authors":"Marie-Louise Wöhrle, Alice Street, Maïwenn Kersaudy-Kerhoas","doi":"10.2471/BLT.24.292167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the type and amount of materials used in commercial lateral flow tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected and weighed the components of 21 commercial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lateral flow tests from the European Union, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and the World Health Organization's emergency use listing procedure. We took test kits apart manually, classified components and weighed them individually.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We found large variations in the total average weights of the lateral flow kits ranging from 13.7 g per test to 84.6 g. The average weight of standard housing in the kits was 4.1 g per casing (range: 2.8-6.5). The packaging made up between 34% and more than 89% of the whole kit and was found to be a large source of weight variations. In the standard kits, plastics made up on average 36% of the total weight, while paper and cardboard accounted for 52% on average. In the non-standard kits, which had newer cassette designs, the opposite was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wide variation in the weight of components in COVID-19 tests suggests there is scope for manufacturers to reduce the amount of materials, including plastic, in these products. We propose that a quantitative baseline of material usage be introduced in target product profiles for lateral flow tests to limit the large volume of plastic from reaching the market, and reduce the burden of plastic waste from diagnostic testing on local waste management systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9465,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","volume":"103 4","pages":"236-246"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.292167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the type and amount of materials used in commercial lateral flow tests.

Methods: We collected and weighed the components of 21 commercial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lateral flow tests from the European Union, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and the World Health Organization's emergency use listing procedure. We took test kits apart manually, classified components and weighed them individually.

Findings: We found large variations in the total average weights of the lateral flow kits ranging from 13.7 g per test to 84.6 g. The average weight of standard housing in the kits was 4.1 g per casing (range: 2.8-6.5). The packaging made up between 34% and more than 89% of the whole kit and was found to be a large source of weight variations. In the standard kits, plastics made up on average 36% of the total weight, while paper and cardboard accounted for 52% on average. In the non-standard kits, which had newer cassette designs, the opposite was observed.

Conclusion: Wide variation in the weight of components in COVID-19 tests suggests there is scope for manufacturers to reduce the amount of materials, including plastic, in these products. We propose that a quantitative baseline of material usage be introduced in target product profiles for lateral flow tests to limit the large volume of plastic from reaching the market, and reduce the burden of plastic waste from diagnostic testing on local waste management systems.

横向流动分析试剂盒中成分的质量和物质分布。
目的:评价商业侧流试验中所用材料的种类和数量。方法:收集来自欧盟、大不列颠及北爱尔兰联合王国、美利坚合众国和世界卫生组织紧急使用清单程序的21种2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)商业侧流试验的成分并称重。我们手动拆开测试套件,对组件进行分类并分别称重。结果:我们发现横向流动套件的总平均重量变化很大,从13.7 g到84.6 g不等。试剂盒中标准外壳的平均重量为4.1 g /套(范围:2.8-6.5)。包装占整个工具包的34%到89%以上,并且被发现是重量变化的主要来源。在标准套件中,塑料平均占总重量的36%,而纸和纸板平均占52%。在具有较新卡带设计的非标准套件中,观察到的情况正好相反。结论:COVID-19测试中组件重量的巨大差异表明,制造商有空间减少这些产品中的材料(包括塑料)的数量。我们建议在横向流动测试的目标产品概况中引入材料使用的定量基线,以限制大量塑料进入市场,并减少对当地废物管理系统进行诊断测试的塑料废物的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.90%
发文量
317
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the World Health Organization Journal Overview: Leading public health journal Peer-reviewed monthly journal Special focus on developing countries Global scope and authority Top public and environmental health journal Impact factor of 6.818 (2018), according to Web of Science ranking Audience: Essential reading for public health decision-makers and researchers Provides blend of research, well-informed opinion, and news
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信