Acupuncture for procedural pain in newborn infants.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rita Cabano, Haneen Al-Abdallat, Rawan Hamamreh, Greg Soll, Ju Lee Oei, Georg M Schmölzer, Matteo Bruschettini
{"title":"Acupuncture for procedural pain in newborn infants.","authors":"Rita Cabano, Haneen Al-Abdallat, Rawan Hamamreh, Greg Soll, Ju Lee Oei, Georg M Schmölzer, Matteo Bruschettini","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD015894.pub2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Procedural pain management in newborns, particularly those in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), presents challenges due to limited safe and effective options. Acupuncture, a Traditional Chinese Medicine practice, has emerged as a potential alternative for pain relief in this population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the benefits and harms of acupuncture in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, and clinical trial registries up to August 2023. We checked the references of included studies and related systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We included parallel and cross-over randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture with no treatment or sham treatment; any non-pharmacological treatment; any pharmacological treatment; or one type of acupuncture compared to another type of acupuncture.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Our outcomes were: pain scores; harms; parental, family, and caregiver satisfaction with the intervention; use of additional pharmacological intervention for pain relief; episodes of bradycardia/apnea/desaturation; neonatal mortality; mortality during initial hospitalization; intraventricular hemorrhage; late-onset sepsis; duration of hospital stay; major neurodevelopmental disability.</p><p><strong>Risk of bias: </strong>We used Cochrane's RoB 1 tool for RCTs.</p><p><strong>Synthesis methods: </strong>We conducted meta-analyses using fixed-effect models to calculate risk ratios (RR) and risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD, when combining different pain scales) and standard deviation for continuous outcomes. We summarized the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Included studies: </strong>We included 11 RCTs enrolling 852 infants. Five studies compared acupuncture to no treatment or sham treatment; four studies to non-pharmacological treatment (oral sucrose or glucose); and two studies compared acupuncture to other types of Traditional Chinese Medicine treatments, which we refer to as 'type B acupuncture,' such as foot massage or reflexology. No studies compared acupuncture to any pharmacological treatment. We identified four ongoing studies.</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>We have listed outcomes reported in at least one study. Acupuncture compared to no treatment or sham treatment Acupuncture may reduce pain assessed during the procedure with any validated scale compared to no intervention (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.37; 7 studies, 471 infants; low-certainty evidence). It may result in little to no difference in any harms compared to no intervention (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.31; 2 studies, 138 infants; low-certainty evidence). Acupuncture compared to any non-pharmacological treatment The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of acupuncture on pain assessed with a validated scale during the procedure compared to non-pharmacological intervention (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.54; 4 studies, 267 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Acupuncture may result in little to no difference in any harms compared to non-pharmacological treatment (RR not estimable, RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.03; 3 studies, 247 infants; low-certainty evidence). Acupuncture type A (e.g. penetration of the skin with a needle) compared to acupuncture type B (e.g. foot massage or reflexology) The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of acupressure on pain assessed with any validated scale during the procedure compared to foot massage (SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.36; 2 studies, 163 infants; very low-certainty evidence).</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>Acupuncture may reduce pain assessed with different scales during the procedure, with little to no difference in any harms, when compared to no intervention. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of acupuncture on pain assessed with different scales during the procedure when compared to any non-pharmacological treatment; acupuncture may result in little to no difference in any harms. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of acupressure on pain assessed during the procedure when compared to foot massage or reflexology.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Protocol (2023): doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015894.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"4 ","pages":"CD015894"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015894.pub2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Procedural pain management in newborns, particularly those in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), presents challenges due to limited safe and effective options. Acupuncture, a Traditional Chinese Medicine practice, has emerged as a potential alternative for pain relief in this population.

Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of acupuncture in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, and clinical trial registries up to August 2023. We checked the references of included studies and related systematic reviews.

Eligibility criteria: We included parallel and cross-over randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture with no treatment or sham treatment; any non-pharmacological treatment; any pharmacological treatment; or one type of acupuncture compared to another type of acupuncture.

Outcomes: Our outcomes were: pain scores; harms; parental, family, and caregiver satisfaction with the intervention; use of additional pharmacological intervention for pain relief; episodes of bradycardia/apnea/desaturation; neonatal mortality; mortality during initial hospitalization; intraventricular hemorrhage; late-onset sepsis; duration of hospital stay; major neurodevelopmental disability.

Risk of bias: We used Cochrane's RoB 1 tool for RCTs.

Synthesis methods: We conducted meta-analyses using fixed-effect models to calculate risk ratios (RR) and risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD, when combining different pain scales) and standard deviation for continuous outcomes. We summarized the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE approach.

Included studies: We included 11 RCTs enrolling 852 infants. Five studies compared acupuncture to no treatment or sham treatment; four studies to non-pharmacological treatment (oral sucrose or glucose); and two studies compared acupuncture to other types of Traditional Chinese Medicine treatments, which we refer to as 'type B acupuncture,' such as foot massage or reflexology. No studies compared acupuncture to any pharmacological treatment. We identified four ongoing studies.

Synthesis of results: We have listed outcomes reported in at least one study. Acupuncture compared to no treatment or sham treatment Acupuncture may reduce pain assessed during the procedure with any validated scale compared to no intervention (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.37; 7 studies, 471 infants; low-certainty evidence). It may result in little to no difference in any harms compared to no intervention (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.31; 2 studies, 138 infants; low-certainty evidence). Acupuncture compared to any non-pharmacological treatment The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of acupuncture on pain assessed with a validated scale during the procedure compared to non-pharmacological intervention (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.54; 4 studies, 267 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Acupuncture may result in little to no difference in any harms compared to non-pharmacological treatment (RR not estimable, RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.03; 3 studies, 247 infants; low-certainty evidence). Acupuncture type A (e.g. penetration of the skin with a needle) compared to acupuncture type B (e.g. foot massage or reflexology) The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of acupressure on pain assessed with any validated scale during the procedure compared to foot massage (SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.36; 2 studies, 163 infants; very low-certainty evidence).

Authors' conclusions: Acupuncture may reduce pain assessed with different scales during the procedure, with little to no difference in any harms, when compared to no intervention. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of acupuncture on pain assessed with different scales during the procedure when compared to any non-pharmacological treatment; acupuncture may result in little to no difference in any harms. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of acupressure on pain assessed during the procedure when compared to foot massage or reflexology.

Funding: This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.

Registration: Protocol (2023): doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015894.

针刺治疗新生儿程序性疼痛。
理由:新生儿的程序性疼痛管理,特别是在新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs),由于有限的安全和有效的选择,提出了挑战。针灸,一种传统的中医实践,已经成为缓解这一人群疼痛的潜在替代方法。目的:评估针刺治疗新生儿疼痛手术的利与弊。检索方法:我们检索了截至2023年8月的Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)、PubMed、Embase和临床试验注册库。我们查阅了纳入研究的参考文献和相关的系统综述。入选标准:我们纳入了平行和交叉随机对照试验(rct),比较针灸与不治疗或假治疗;任何非药物治疗;任何药物治疗;或者一种针灸与另一种针灸的比较。结果:我们的结果是:疼痛评分;危害;父母、家庭和照顾者对干预的满意度;使用额外的药物干预来缓解疼痛;心动过缓/呼吸暂停/去饱和发作;新生儿死亡率;初次住院期间的死亡率;脑室内出血;晚发性败血症;住院时间;主要的神经发育障碍。偏倚风险:我们使用Cochrane的RoB 1工具进行随机对照试验。综合方法:我们使用固定效应模型进行meta分析,以95%置信区间(CI)计算二分类结局的风险比(RR)和风险差(RD),以及结合不同疼痛量表时的平均差(MD)或标准化平均差(SMD)和连续结局的标准差。我们根据GRADE方法总结了证据的确定性。纳入的研究:我们纳入了11项随机对照试验,共纳入852名婴儿。五项研究将针灸与不治疗或假治疗进行比较;四项研究是非药物治疗(口服蔗糖或葡萄糖);还有两项研究将针灸与其他中医疗法进行了比较,我们称之为“B类针灸”,比如足部按摩或足底按摩。没有研究将针灸与任何药物治疗进行比较。我们确定了四项正在进行的研究。结果综合:我们列出了至少一项研究报告的结果。与不干预相比,针灸可以减轻手术过程中任何有效量表评估的疼痛(SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.75至-0.37;7项研究,471名婴儿;确定性的证据)。与不干预相比,干预可能导致的任何危害几乎没有差异(RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.01 ~ 8.31;2项研究,138名婴儿;确定性的证据)。与任何非药物治疗相比,针灸治疗过程中与非药物干预相比,针灸对疼痛的影响的证据非常不确定(SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.04至0.54;4项研究,267名婴儿;非常低确定性证据)。与非药物治疗相比,针灸可能导致的任何危害几乎没有差异(RR不可估计,RD为0.00,95% CI为-0.03至0.03;3项研究,247名婴儿;确定性的证据)。针灸A型(例如,用针刺入皮肤)与针灸B型(例如,足部按摩或反射疗法)相比,在治疗过程中,用任何有效的量表评估指压对疼痛的影响,与足部按摩相比,证据非常不确定(SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.26至0.36;2项研究,163名婴儿;非常低确定性证据)。作者的结论是:在手术过程中,针灸可以减轻不同程度的疼痛,与不干预相比,在任何伤害上几乎没有差异。与任何非药物治疗相比,针灸对手术过程中不同尺度疼痛的影响证据非常不确定;针灸可能对任何危害几乎没有影响。与足部按摩或足底按摩相比,穴位按压对疼痛的影响尚不明确。资金来源:Cochrane综述没有专门的资金来源。注册:协议(2023):doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015894。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信