National Variation in Implementation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Clinically Node-Positive Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17293-x
Crystal D Taylor, Ton Wang, Brandy R Sinco, Melissa Pilewskie, Tasha M Hughes, Lesly A Dossett
{"title":"National Variation in Implementation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Clinically Node-Positive Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy.","authors":"Crystal D Taylor, Ton Wang, Brandy R Sinco, Melissa Pilewskie, Tasha M Hughes, Lesly A Dossett","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17293-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is feasible in women with clinically node-positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a nodal pathologic complete response. Acceptable false negative rates are achieved through technical considerations such as removing three or more sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs); however, the variation that exists in adherence to this technique is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate recent trends in axillary surgery in women with cN1-cN2 disease who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adherence to removing three or more SLNs, and variation in SLN yield.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cohort study using the National Cancer Database of women aged ≥18 years with cN1-cN2 disease who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including those without a pathologic complete response, from 2012 to 2020. Trends in axillary surgery and lymph node yield obtained during SLNB were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 67,365 women (median age 54 years). The number of patients receiving SLNB alone increased from 14 to 39%; SLNB with completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) increased from 17 to 30%; and ALND alone decreased from 69 to 27%. The rates of obtaining three or more SLNs during SLNB remained the same over time at 66%, while facility-level variation in obtaining three or more nodes ranged from 40 to 86%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There has been de-escalation of axillary surgery with fewer patients undergoing ALND; however, overall there has been no significant change in the rates of obtaining three or more lymph nodes during SLNB following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with significant facility-level variation observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"4874-4882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17293-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is feasible in women with clinically node-positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a nodal pathologic complete response. Acceptable false negative rates are achieved through technical considerations such as removing three or more sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs); however, the variation that exists in adherence to this technique is unclear.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate recent trends in axillary surgery in women with cN1-cN2 disease who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adherence to removing three or more SLNs, and variation in SLN yield.

Methods: We performed a cohort study using the National Cancer Database of women aged ≥18 years with cN1-cN2 disease who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including those without a pathologic complete response, from 2012 to 2020. Trends in axillary surgery and lymph node yield obtained during SLNB were evaluated.

Results: The cohort included 67,365 women (median age 54 years). The number of patients receiving SLNB alone increased from 14 to 39%; SLNB with completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) increased from 17 to 30%; and ALND alone decreased from 69 to 27%. The rates of obtaining three or more SLNs during SLNB remained the same over time at 66%, while facility-level variation in obtaining three or more nodes ranged from 40 to 86%.

Conclusions: There has been de-escalation of axillary surgery with fewer patients undergoing ALND; however, overall there has been no significant change in the rates of obtaining three or more lymph nodes during SLNB following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with significant facility-level variation observed.

接受新辅助治疗的临床淋巴结阳性患者前哨淋巴结活检实施的国家差异。
背景:前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)对临床淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者在新辅助化疗和淋巴结病理完全缓解后是可行的。通过技术上的考虑,如切除三个或更多前哨淋巴结(sln),可以实现可接受的假阴性率;然而,坚持这项技术的差异尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评估接受新辅助化疗的cN1-cN2疾病女性腋窝手术的最新趋势,坚持切除三个或更多的SLN,以及SLN产量的变化。方法:我们使用国家癌症数据库进行了一项队列研究,从2012年到2020年,年龄≥18岁的cN1-cN2疾病患者接受了新辅助化疗,包括那些没有病理完全缓解的患者。评估了SLNB期间腋窝手术和淋巴结产量的趋势。结果:该队列包括67,365名女性(中位年龄54岁)。单独接受SLNB的患者从14%增加到39%;完全性腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)的SLNB从17%增加到30%;ALND从69%下降到27%。在SLNB期间获得3个或更多sln的比率一直保持不变,为66%,而获得3个或更多节点的设施水平变化从40%到86%不等。结论:腋窝手术的风险有所降低,ALND患者减少;然而,总体而言,在新辅助化疗后的SLNB中获得三个或更多淋巴结的比率没有明显变化,观察到明显的设施水平变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信