Effect of mixing tip design on the mechanical properties, porosity, and waste reduction of extra-light-body polyvinyl siloxane impression material.

Q3 Medicine
General dentistry Pub Date : 2025-05-01
Kaisha T Calvin, Eric Hu, Robert Masterson
{"title":"Effect of mixing tip design on the mechanical properties, porosity, and waste reduction of extra-light-body polyvinyl siloxane impression material.","authors":"Kaisha T Calvin, Eric Hu, Robert Masterson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, porosity, and waste reduction of extra-light-body polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression material mixed with a helical impression tip or a new cartridge integrated system (NCIS) from the same manufacturer (Dentsply Sirona). The legacy teal tip (TT group) was compared with the NCIS red (RT group) and blue (BT group) mixing tips. Dumbbell-shaped specimens (TT, n = 17; RT, n = 15; and BT, n = 16) were prepared in accordance with German Institute for Standardization's rubber testing standard (DIN 53504.2017) and tested in a universal testing machine for tensile strength and modulus of elasticity. Porosity was evaluated via microcomputed tomography of cylindrical specimens (TT, n = 7; RT, n = 6; and BT, n = 7). Waste reduction was evaluated by comparing the mass of the mixing tips before use and after polymerization of the PVS to determine the difference in weight, which represented the amount of retained material (n = 11 per group). Tensile strength was analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Modulus of elasticity was analyzed using 1-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD. Porosity and waste reduction were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis, and Steel-Dwass tests. The analyses revealed no differences in tensile strength between groups (P = 0.493). The TT group had a significantly higher modulus of elasticity than the RT and BT groups (P < 0.001). The BT group had the highest mean porosity, and the difference between BT and RT was statistically significant (P = 0.048). The RT group showed the least material waste. Supporting the claims of the manufacturer, the NCIS tips generated tensile strengths comparable to that of the legacy tip and produced less waste, achieving waste reductions of 62% (RT) and 21% (BT) compared with the legacy tip. However, the RT and BT groups had a lower modulus of elasticity than the TT group, and porosity was increased in the BT group.</p>","PeriodicalId":12571,"journal":{"name":"General dentistry","volume":"73 3","pages":"28-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, porosity, and waste reduction of extra-light-body polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression material mixed with a helical impression tip or a new cartridge integrated system (NCIS) from the same manufacturer (Dentsply Sirona). The legacy teal tip (TT group) was compared with the NCIS red (RT group) and blue (BT group) mixing tips. Dumbbell-shaped specimens (TT, n = 17; RT, n = 15; and BT, n = 16) were prepared in accordance with German Institute for Standardization's rubber testing standard (DIN 53504.2017) and tested in a universal testing machine for tensile strength and modulus of elasticity. Porosity was evaluated via microcomputed tomography of cylindrical specimens (TT, n = 7; RT, n = 6; and BT, n = 7). Waste reduction was evaluated by comparing the mass of the mixing tips before use and after polymerization of the PVS to determine the difference in weight, which represented the amount of retained material (n = 11 per group). Tensile strength was analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Modulus of elasticity was analyzed using 1-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD. Porosity and waste reduction were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis, and Steel-Dwass tests. The analyses revealed no differences in tensile strength between groups (P = 0.493). The TT group had a significantly higher modulus of elasticity than the RT and BT groups (P < 0.001). The BT group had the highest mean porosity, and the difference between BT and RT was statistically significant (P = 0.048). The RT group showed the least material waste. Supporting the claims of the manufacturer, the NCIS tips generated tensile strengths comparable to that of the legacy tip and produced less waste, achieving waste reductions of 62% (RT) and 21% (BT) compared with the legacy tip. However, the RT and BT groups had a lower modulus of elasticity than the TT group, and porosity was increased in the BT group.

混合头设计对超轻体聚乙烯醇硅氧烷压模材料力学性能、孔隙率和减废率的影响。
本研究的目的是比较来自同一制造商(Dentsply Sirona)的超轻体聚氯乙烯硅氧烷(PVS)印模材料与螺旋印模尖端或新型盒集成系统(NCIS)混合的拉伸强度、弹性模量、孔隙率和废物减减量。将遗留青色针尖(TT组)与NCIS红色(RT组)和蓝色(BT组)混合针尖进行比较。哑铃形标本(TT, n = 17;RT, n = 15;和BT, n = 16)按照德国标准化协会橡胶测试标准(DIN 53504.2017)制备,并在万能试验机上进行拉伸强度和弹性模量测试。通过圆柱形试样的微计算机断层扫描评估孔隙度(TT, n = 7;RT, n = 6;BT, n = 7)。通过比较PVS使用前和聚合后混合头的质量来确定重量的差异,从而评估废物减量(n = 11 /组)。抗拉强度分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)。弹性模量分析采用Tukey HSD的单因素方差分析。采用Shapiro-Wilk、Kruskal-Wallis和Steel-Dwass测试分析孔隙率和废物减量。分析显示两组间抗拉强度无差异(P = 0.493)。TT组的弹性模量显著高于RT组和BT组(P < 0.001)。BT组平均孔隙率最高,与RT组差异有统计学意义(P = 0.048)。RT组的物质浪费最少。NCIS尖端产生的抗拉强度与传统尖端相当,产生的废物更少,与传统尖端相比,废物减少了62% (RT)和21% (BT),这证明了制造商的说法。然而,RT和BT组的弹性模量低于TT组,BT组的孔隙率增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
General dentistry
General dentistry Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: General Dentistry is the premier peer-reviewed journal of the Academy of General Dentistry (AGD). Published bi-monthly, General Dentistry presents research and clinical findings to support the full range of procedures that general dentists perform on a regular basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信