Matthew R Dunn, Hongqian Niu, Didong Li, Marc A Emerson, Caroline A Thompson, Hazel B Nichols, Mya L Roberson, Stephanie B Wheeler, Terry Hyslop, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Melissa A Troester
{"title":"Applying a novel measure of community-level healthcare access to assess breast cancer care timeliness.","authors":"Matthew R Dunn, Hongqian Niu, Didong Li, Marc A Emerson, Caroline A Thompson, Hazel B Nichols, Mya L Roberson, Stephanie B Wheeler, Terry Hyslop, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Melissa A Troester","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geographic disparities in breast cancer outcomes exist. Few studies have examined community- and health system-level factors associated with care timeliness, an important measure of care quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Carolina Breast Cancer Study is a population-based cohort of 2,998 women with invasive breast cancer (2008-2013). Using latent class modeling, patients' census tracts of residence were characterized by healthcare accessibility and affordability. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ratings were used to classify hospitals as low- or high-quality. Six timeliness outcomes were assessed: 1) lacking pre-diagnostic regular care, 2) being under-screened, 3) late-stage diagnosis, 4) delayed treatment initiation, 5) prolonged treatment duration, and 6) lacking receipt of OncotypeDx genomic testing. Associations of geographic accessibility, healthcare affordability, and hospital-level quality with care timeliness were evaluated with frequency differences (RFDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to \"high accessibility, high affordability\" census tracts, patients residing in \"low accessibility, low affordability\" areas were more likely to be under-screened (RFD= 18.7%, CI: 13.0, 24.3), have late-stage diagnosis (RFD= 6.2%, CI: 2.4, 10.1), and experience prolonged treatment (RFD=6.9%, CI: 1.4, 12.3). \"High accessibility, low affordability\" areas had the highest frequency of treatment delay (RFD= 9.3%, CI: 3.9, 14.7). Initial surgery at a high-quality facility was associated with less delayed treatment (RFD= -3.9%, CI: -7.5, -0.4) and prolonged treatment (RFD= -5.9%, CI: -9.9, -1.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community- and health system-level factors were associated with timely breast cancer care.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Policy efforts to improve access in communities should consider multiple dimensions of access including geospatial accessibility and affordability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Geographic disparities in breast cancer outcomes exist. Few studies have examined community- and health system-level factors associated with care timeliness, an important measure of care quality.
Methods: The Carolina Breast Cancer Study is a population-based cohort of 2,998 women with invasive breast cancer (2008-2013). Using latent class modeling, patients' census tracts of residence were characterized by healthcare accessibility and affordability. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ratings were used to classify hospitals as low- or high-quality. Six timeliness outcomes were assessed: 1) lacking pre-diagnostic regular care, 2) being under-screened, 3) late-stage diagnosis, 4) delayed treatment initiation, 5) prolonged treatment duration, and 6) lacking receipt of OncotypeDx genomic testing. Associations of geographic accessibility, healthcare affordability, and hospital-level quality with care timeliness were evaluated with frequency differences (RFDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Compared to "high accessibility, high affordability" census tracts, patients residing in "low accessibility, low affordability" areas were more likely to be under-screened (RFD= 18.7%, CI: 13.0, 24.3), have late-stage diagnosis (RFD= 6.2%, CI: 2.4, 10.1), and experience prolonged treatment (RFD=6.9%, CI: 1.4, 12.3). "High accessibility, low affordability" areas had the highest frequency of treatment delay (RFD= 9.3%, CI: 3.9, 14.7). Initial surgery at a high-quality facility was associated with less delayed treatment (RFD= -3.9%, CI: -7.5, -0.4) and prolonged treatment (RFD= -5.9%, CI: -9.9, -1.9).
Conclusions: Community- and health system-level factors were associated with timely breast cancer care.
Impact: Policy efforts to improve access in communities should consider multiple dimensions of access including geospatial accessibility and affordability.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.