Applying a novel measure of community-level healthcare access to assess breast cancer care timeliness.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Matthew R Dunn, Hongqian Niu, Didong Li, Marc A Emerson, Caroline A Thompson, Hazel B Nichols, Mya L Roberson, Stephanie B Wheeler, Terry Hyslop, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Melissa A Troester
{"title":"Applying a novel measure of community-level healthcare access to assess breast cancer care timeliness.","authors":"Matthew R Dunn, Hongqian Niu, Didong Li, Marc A Emerson, Caroline A Thompson, Hazel B Nichols, Mya L Roberson, Stephanie B Wheeler, Terry Hyslop, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Melissa A Troester","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geographic disparities in breast cancer outcomes exist. Few studies have examined community- and health system-level factors associated with care timeliness, an important measure of care quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Carolina Breast Cancer Study is a population-based cohort of 2,998 women with invasive breast cancer (2008-2013). Using latent class modeling, patients' census tracts of residence were characterized by healthcare accessibility and affordability. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ratings were used to classify hospitals as low- or high-quality. Six timeliness outcomes were assessed: 1) lacking pre-diagnostic regular care, 2) being under-screened, 3) late-stage diagnosis, 4) delayed treatment initiation, 5) prolonged treatment duration, and 6) lacking receipt of OncotypeDx genomic testing. Associations of geographic accessibility, healthcare affordability, and hospital-level quality with care timeliness were evaluated with frequency differences (RFDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to \"high accessibility, high affordability\" census tracts, patients residing in \"low accessibility, low affordability\" areas were more likely to be under-screened (RFD= 18.7%, CI: 13.0, 24.3), have late-stage diagnosis (RFD= 6.2%, CI: 2.4, 10.1), and experience prolonged treatment (RFD=6.9%, CI: 1.4, 12.3). \"High accessibility, low affordability\" areas had the highest frequency of treatment delay (RFD= 9.3%, CI: 3.9, 14.7). Initial surgery at a high-quality facility was associated with less delayed treatment (RFD= -3.9%, CI: -7.5, -0.4) and prolonged treatment (RFD= -5.9%, CI: -9.9, -1.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community- and health system-level factors were associated with timely breast cancer care.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Policy efforts to improve access in communities should consider multiple dimensions of access including geospatial accessibility and affordability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Geographic disparities in breast cancer outcomes exist. Few studies have examined community- and health system-level factors associated with care timeliness, an important measure of care quality.

Methods: The Carolina Breast Cancer Study is a population-based cohort of 2,998 women with invasive breast cancer (2008-2013). Using latent class modeling, patients' census tracts of residence were characterized by healthcare accessibility and affordability. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ratings were used to classify hospitals as low- or high-quality. Six timeliness outcomes were assessed: 1) lacking pre-diagnostic regular care, 2) being under-screened, 3) late-stage diagnosis, 4) delayed treatment initiation, 5) prolonged treatment duration, and 6) lacking receipt of OncotypeDx genomic testing. Associations of geographic accessibility, healthcare affordability, and hospital-level quality with care timeliness were evaluated with frequency differences (RFDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Compared to "high accessibility, high affordability" census tracts, patients residing in "low accessibility, low affordability" areas were more likely to be under-screened (RFD= 18.7%, CI: 13.0, 24.3), have late-stage diagnosis (RFD= 6.2%, CI: 2.4, 10.1), and experience prolonged treatment (RFD=6.9%, CI: 1.4, 12.3). "High accessibility, low affordability" areas had the highest frequency of treatment delay (RFD= 9.3%, CI: 3.9, 14.7). Initial surgery at a high-quality facility was associated with less delayed treatment (RFD= -3.9%, CI: -7.5, -0.4) and prolonged treatment (RFD= -5.9%, CI: -9.9, -1.9).

Conclusions: Community- and health system-level factors were associated with timely breast cancer care.

Impact: Policy efforts to improve access in communities should consider multiple dimensions of access including geospatial accessibility and affordability.

应用一种新型的社区一级医疗保健可及性措施来评估乳腺癌护理的及时性。
背景:乳腺癌预后存在地域差异。很少有研究调查了社区和卫生系统层面与护理及时性相关的因素,而护理及时性是衡量护理质量的重要指标。方法:卡罗莱纳乳腺癌研究是一项基于人群的队列研究,包括2,998名浸润性乳腺癌女性(2008-2013)。利用潜在类别模型,对患者居住的人口普查区进行医疗可及性和可负担性的表征。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的评级被用来对医院进行低质量和高质量的分类。评估了六项及时性结果:1)缺乏诊断前的常规护理,2)筛查不足,3)晚期诊断,4)延迟治疗开始,5)延长治疗时间,6)缺乏接受OncotypeDx基因组检测。使用频率差异(rfd)和95%置信区间(ci)评估地理可及性、医疗负担能力和医院质量与护理及时性的关系。结果:与“高可及性、高可负担性”人口普查区相比,居住在“低可及性、低可负担性”地区的患者更容易筛查不足(RFD= 18.7%, CI: 13.0, 24.3),诊断较晚(RFD= 6.2%, CI: 2.4, 10.1),治疗时间较长(RFD=6.9%, CI: 1.4, 12.3)。“高可及性、低负担性”地区的治疗延误频率最高(RFD= 9.3%, CI: 3.9, 14.7)。在高质量的机构进行初始手术与较少的延迟治疗(RFD= -3.9%, CI: -7.5, -0.4)和延长治疗(RFD= -5.9%, CI: -9.9, -1.9)相关。结论:社区和卫生系统层面的因素与及时的乳腺癌护理有关。影响:改善社区可及性的政策努力应考虑可及性的多个维度,包括地理空间可及性和可负担性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信