Neoadjuvant Immunochemoradiation Therapy Versus Chemoradiation Therapy in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Individual Patient Data.
{"title":"Neoadjuvant Immunochemoradiation Therapy Versus Chemoradiation Therapy in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Individual Patient Data.","authors":"Yunsong Liu, Yu Men, Yongxing Bao, Zeliang Ma, Jun Wang, Qingsong Pang, Jianjun Qin, Liyan Xue, Chen Hu, Zhouguang Hui","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.04.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neoadjuvant immunochemoradiation therapy (nICRT) is emerging as a promising treatment for resectable esophageal cancer, but comprehensive analyses comparing it with standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) are limited. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival outcomes of nICRT versus nCRT. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and major conference proceedings up to October 30, 2024, identified studies involving resectable esophageal cancer treated with nICRT or nCRT. Data on pathologic complete response, major pathologic response, treatment-related adverse events, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival were extracted. A one-stage meta-analysis using reconstructed individual patient data was performed, calculating hazard ratios with 95% CIs. Thirty-seven studies were included, comprising 811 patients treated with nICRT and 1796 with nCRT. nICRT demonstrated significantly longer OS than nCRT (hazard ratio, 0.714; 95% CI, 0.550-0.926; P = .011). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 89.9%, 76.0% and 66.4%, respectively, for nICRT, compared with 85.0%, 66.5%, and 57.3% for nCRT. The pathologic complete response rate was significantly higher in nICRT (50% vs 38%; P = .040) for squamous cell carcinoma. Safety profiles were comparable, with no significant differences in grades 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse events or postoperative complications between the groups. nICRT showed potential for superior survival compared with standard nCRT in resectable esophageal cancer and showed enhanced pathologic response in squamous cell carcinoma, with a possibly acceptable safety profile. These findings support future trials integrating immunotherapy into neoadjuvant treatment regimens for esophageal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.04.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Neoadjuvant immunochemoradiation therapy (nICRT) is emerging as a promising treatment for resectable esophageal cancer, but comprehensive analyses comparing it with standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) are limited. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival outcomes of nICRT versus nCRT. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and major conference proceedings up to October 30, 2024, identified studies involving resectable esophageal cancer treated with nICRT or nCRT. Data on pathologic complete response, major pathologic response, treatment-related adverse events, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival were extracted. A one-stage meta-analysis using reconstructed individual patient data was performed, calculating hazard ratios with 95% CIs. Thirty-seven studies were included, comprising 811 patients treated with nICRT and 1796 with nCRT. nICRT demonstrated significantly longer OS than nCRT (hazard ratio, 0.714; 95% CI, 0.550-0.926; P = .011). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 89.9%, 76.0% and 66.4%, respectively, for nICRT, compared with 85.0%, 66.5%, and 57.3% for nCRT. The pathologic complete response rate was significantly higher in nICRT (50% vs 38%; P = .040) for squamous cell carcinoma. Safety profiles were comparable, with no significant differences in grades 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse events or postoperative complications between the groups. nICRT showed potential for superior survival compared with standard nCRT in resectable esophageal cancer and showed enhanced pathologic response in squamous cell carcinoma, with a possibly acceptable safety profile. These findings support future trials integrating immunotherapy into neoadjuvant treatment regimens for esophageal cancer.
目的:新辅助免疫放化疗(nICRT)正在成为一种有希望的治疗可切除食管癌的方法,但将其与标准新辅助放化疗(nCRT)进行比较的综合分析有限。本荟萃分析旨在评估nICRT与nCRT的疗效、安全性和生存结果。方法和材料:系统检索PubMed, Embase, Cochrane图书馆和主要会议论文集,截至2024年10月30日,确定了涉及nICRT或nCRT治疗可切除食管癌的研究。提取病理完全缓解(pCR)、主要病理反应(MPR)、治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)、总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的数据。使用重建的个体患者数据进行一项单阶段荟萃分析,以95%置信区间(ci)计算风险比(hr)。结果:纳入37项研究,包括811例nICRT治疗和1796例nCRT治疗。nICRT的OS明显长于nCRT (HR = 0.714,95% CI 0.550-0.926, p = 0.011)。nICRT组1年、2年和3年的OS率分别为89.9%、76.0%和66.4%,而nCRT组为85.0%、66.5%和57.3%。nICRT的pCR率显著高于前者(50% vs. 38%;P = 0.040)。安全性具有可比性,两组之间3-4级trae或术后并发症无显著差异。结论:与标准nCRT相比,nICRT在可切除食管癌中显示出更高的生存潜力,并在鳞状细胞癌中显示出增强的病理反应,具有可能可接受的安全性。这些发现支持将免疫疗法纳入食管癌新辅助治疗方案的未来试验。
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.