Evaluation of the price-efficacy relationship for multiple brands of ciprofloxacin and gentamicin in Kabul: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Ahmad Zia Noori, Hashmatullah Yousufi, Haji Mohammad Naimi
{"title":"Evaluation of the price-efficacy relationship for multiple brands of ciprofloxacin and gentamicin in Kabul: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ahmad Zia Noori, Hashmatullah Yousufi, Haji Mohammad Naimi","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07258-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The quality of consumer products constitutes a prominent issue on a global scale. The proliferation of counterfeit pharmaceuticals poses a significant challenge not only in developing and underdeveloped nations but also represents a considerable concern in developed countries. In Kabul, a major issue is the availability of multiple brands of antibiotics with fluctuating prices. To ascertain the quality and correlation of pricing with the efficacy of antibiotics, an evaluation of their effectiveness is deemed both essential and significant. Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin are widely utilized antibiotics for treating infections induced by specific strains of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between brand price and the efficacy of these antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 40 ciprofloxacin 500 mg tablet brands and 15 gentamicin 80 mg ampule brands were procured from pharmacies in Kabul across eight countries. Ten samples from each brands were assessed for efficacy through MIC and MBC assays against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213), following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Efficacy data were obtained by inoculating S. aureus suspensions in Mueller-Hinton medium with various concentrations of each antibiotic, incubated at 35-37˚C for 24 h. Following MIC determination, inoculated cultures were plated on Mueller-Hinton agar and incubated at 35-37˚C for 24 h for colony enumeration. Statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA, Student's t-test, and Pearson correlation via SPSS version 26, with p-values of ≤ 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prices of Ciprofloxacin tablets ranged from 25 to 275 Afghanis (mean = 99.60), while Gentamicin prices varied from 3 to 15 Afghanis (mean = 8.37). Of the 40 ciprofloxacin brands, 6 (15%) were unregistered, and from 15 gentamicin brands, 3 (20%) were unregistered. There was no significant difference in Gentamicin efficacy against S. aureus. However, a significant difference was noted in Ciprofloxacin efficacy against S. aureus (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study highlight the critical need for stringent quality control and regulatory oversight, especially for unregistered antibiotics, due to the significant variations observed in Ciprofloxacin efficacy (p < 0.01), even though no such difference was noted with Gentamicin. Policymakers should implement regulations to ensure all antibiotic brands adhere to quality standards, while pharmacists and healthcare professionals should prioritize using registered, effective medications to safeguard public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07258-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The quality of consumer products constitutes a prominent issue on a global scale. The proliferation of counterfeit pharmaceuticals poses a significant challenge not only in developing and underdeveloped nations but also represents a considerable concern in developed countries. In Kabul, a major issue is the availability of multiple brands of antibiotics with fluctuating prices. To ascertain the quality and correlation of pricing with the efficacy of antibiotics, an evaluation of their effectiveness is deemed both essential and significant. Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin are widely utilized antibiotics for treating infections induced by specific strains of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between brand price and the efficacy of these antibiotics.

Methods: A total of 40 ciprofloxacin 500 mg tablet brands and 15 gentamicin 80 mg ampule brands were procured from pharmacies in Kabul across eight countries. Ten samples from each brands were assessed for efficacy through MIC and MBC assays against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213), following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Efficacy data were obtained by inoculating S. aureus suspensions in Mueller-Hinton medium with various concentrations of each antibiotic, incubated at 35-37˚C for 24 h. Following MIC determination, inoculated cultures were plated on Mueller-Hinton agar and incubated at 35-37˚C for 24 h for colony enumeration. Statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA, Student's t-test, and Pearson correlation via SPSS version 26, with p-values of ≤ 0.05 considered significant.

Results: The prices of Ciprofloxacin tablets ranged from 25 to 275 Afghanis (mean = 99.60), while Gentamicin prices varied from 3 to 15 Afghanis (mean = 8.37). Of the 40 ciprofloxacin brands, 6 (15%) were unregistered, and from 15 gentamicin brands, 3 (20%) were unregistered. There was no significant difference in Gentamicin efficacy against S. aureus. However, a significant difference was noted in Ciprofloxacin efficacy against S. aureus (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The results of this study highlight the critical need for stringent quality control and regulatory oversight, especially for unregistered antibiotics, due to the significant variations observed in Ciprofloxacin efficacy (p < 0.01), even though no such difference was noted with Gentamicin. Policymakers should implement regulations to ensure all antibiotic brands adhere to quality standards, while pharmacists and healthcare professionals should prioritize using registered, effective medications to safeguard public health.

评价喀布尔多品牌环丙沙星和庆大霉素的价格-功效关系:一项横断面研究。
背景:消费品的质量在全球范围内都是一个突出的问题。假药的扩散不仅对发展中国家和不发达国家构成重大挑战,而且对发达国家也构成相当大的关切。在喀布尔,一个主要问题是多种品牌的抗生素价格波动。为了确定抗生素的质量和价格与疗效的相关性,对其有效性进行评估是必要和重要的。环丙沙星和庆大霉素是广泛用于治疗革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性细菌引起的感染的抗生素。本研究的目的是探讨品牌价格与这些抗生素的疗效之间的关系。方法:从喀布尔8个国家的药店采购40个品牌的环丙沙星500 mg片剂和15个品牌的庆大霉素80 mg安瓿剂。根据临床和实验室标准协会的协议,通过MIC和MBC测定每个品牌的10个样品对金黄色葡萄球菌(ATCC 29213)的疗效进行评估。将金黄色葡萄球菌悬液接种于不同浓度的每种抗生素的Mueller-Hinton培养基中,在35-37℃孵育24 h,获得疗效数据。MIC测定后,将接种的培养物置于muller - hinton琼脂上,在35-37℃孵育24 h,进行菌落计数。统计学分析采用方差分析、学生t检验和Pearson相关分析,采用SPSS 26, p值≤0.05为显著性。结果:环丙沙星片剂价格为25 ~ 275阿富汗尼(平均为99.60),庆大霉素片剂价格为3 ~ 15阿富汗尼(平均为8.37)。40个环丙沙星品牌中有6个(15%)未注册,15个庆大霉素品牌中有3个(20%)未注册。庆大霉素对金黄色葡萄球菌的疗效差异无统计学意义。然而,环丙沙星对金黄色葡萄球菌的疗效存在显著差异(p)。结论:本研究的结果强调了严格的质量控制和监管监督的必要性,特别是对未注册的抗生素,因为环丙沙星的疗效存在显著差异(p)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信