Socioeconomic Disparities in the Care of for High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism in the United States, 2016 to 2020

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Apoorva Doshi MD , Prakash Upreti MD , Vikas Aggarwal MD , Athena Poppas MD , Peter A. Soukas MD , J. Dawn Abbott MD , Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula MD, MSc
{"title":"Socioeconomic Disparities in the Care of for High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism in the United States, 2016 to 2020","authors":"Apoorva Doshi MD ,&nbsp;Prakash Upreti MD ,&nbsp;Vikas Aggarwal MD ,&nbsp;Athena Poppas MD ,&nbsp;Peter A. Soukas MD ,&nbsp;J. Dawn Abbott MD ,&nbsp;Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There are limited data on the impact of socioeconomic factors on the management and outcomes of high-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2020, we identified adult (≥18 years) admissions with high-risk PE (defined as PE with one of: cardiogenic shock, vasopressor use, or cardiac arrest). Socioeconomic determinants included sex, race, insurance payer, and economic status. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, rates of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and definitive PE interventions, hospitalization duration, and hospitalization costs. Among 21,521 high-risk PE hospitalizations (median age 65 years, 53% male, 64% white race), the socioeconomic variables remained stable during the 5-year period. MCS utilization was 4%, with lower rates of utilization in Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, uninsured admissions, and those from the lowest income quartile (all p &lt;0.05). Racial minorities, those from lower economic status, and uninsured admissions received advanced PE interventions less frequently. There did not appear to be notable sex disparities in use of advanced PE therapies. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 50%, with higher adjusted in-hospital mortality in female, African American, Hispanic, uninsured, and economically disadvantaged individuals. In conclusion, significant inequities in in-hospital mortality, mechanical circulatory support, and definitive pulmonary embolism therapy utilization persist among high-risk PE hospitalizations in the United States based on sex, race, income, and insurance status.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"250 ","pages":"Pages 61-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914925002905","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are limited data on the impact of socioeconomic factors on the management and outcomes of high-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2020, we identified adult (≥18 years) admissions with high-risk PE (defined as PE with one of: cardiogenic shock, vasopressor use, or cardiac arrest). Socioeconomic determinants included sex, race, insurance payer, and economic status. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, rates of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and definitive PE interventions, hospitalization duration, and hospitalization costs. Among 21,521 high-risk PE hospitalizations (median age 65 years, 53% male, 64% white race), the socioeconomic variables remained stable during the 5-year period. MCS utilization was 4%, with lower rates of utilization in Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, uninsured admissions, and those from the lowest income quartile (all p <0.05). Racial minorities, those from lower economic status, and uninsured admissions received advanced PE interventions less frequently. There did not appear to be notable sex disparities in use of advanced PE therapies. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 50%, with higher adjusted in-hospital mortality in female, African American, Hispanic, uninsured, and economically disadvantaged individuals. In conclusion, significant inequities in in-hospital mortality, mechanical circulatory support, and definitive pulmonary embolism therapy utilization persist among high-risk PE hospitalizations in the United States based on sex, race, income, and insurance status.
2016-2020年美国高危肺栓塞治疗中的社会经济差异
关于社会经济因素对高危急性肺栓塞(PE)的管理和结局的影响的数据有限。使用2016-2020年的全国住院患者样本(NIS),我们确定了高危PE(定义为PE伴有心源性休克、血管加压药使用或心脏骤停之一)的成人(≥18岁)入院。社会经济因素包括性别、种族、保险支付人和经济地位。研究结果包括住院死亡率、机械循环支持(MCS)率和最终PE干预率、住院时间和住院费用。在21,521例高风险PE住院患者中(中位年龄65岁,53%为男性,64%为白人),社会经济变量在5年期间保持稳定。MCS的使用率为4%,医疗保险和医疗补助受益人、无保险入院者和收入最低四分之一的人的使用率较低
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信