A Process to add Long Term Outcomes into the American Burn Association's Burn Registry - Feasibility to Bridge the Gap.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Claudia C Malic, Plastic Surgeon, Thereasa Abrams, Adam J Singer, Joan Webber, Heidi Altamirano, Farrah Parker, David T Harrington
{"title":"A Process to add Long Term Outcomes into the American Burn Association's Burn Registry - Feasibility to Bridge the Gap.","authors":"Claudia C Malic, Plastic Surgeon, Thereasa Abrams, Adam J Singer, Joan Webber, Heidi Altamirano, Farrah Parker, David T Harrington","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burn registries play a crucial role in enhancing the understanding of burn epidemiology and improving clinical care. However, they often lack comprehensive data on post-discharge outcomes when patients transition to outpatient care. This study aimed to initiate the expansion of the American Burn Association's registry to include long-term outcomes for patients receiving outpatient follow-up post-discharge.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Quality of Burn Registry (QBR) Outpatient Work Group identified nine key long-term outcomes-five clinical and four psychosocial-to track after discharge from burn centers. An alpha pilot study was conducted with seven verified burn centers, collecting data on enrolled patients over 12 months in three-month intervals. A subsequent beta pilot involved ten centers, each monitoring five patients across five predefined cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The alpha pilot enrolled 29 patients, revealing variable documentation and data retrieval times of up to 15 minutes per patient. The beta pilot encompassed 200 patients and recorded 1,417 appointments, averaging 7.1 visits per patient. Notably, 25% of patients were lost to follow-up, and 22% were discharged from care within 12 months. Follow-up visits were most concentrated in the first three months (53.6%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study represents a pioneering effort to systematically collect long-term outcomes for major burn injury survivors during the first year post-discharge. The findings will support ongoing improvements in best practices for burn care and enhance continuity between inpatient and outpatient monitoring, ultimately benefiting quality improvement initiatives for burn-injured patients in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burn registries play a crucial role in enhancing the understanding of burn epidemiology and improving clinical care. However, they often lack comprehensive data on post-discharge outcomes when patients transition to outpatient care. This study aimed to initiate the expansion of the American Burn Association's registry to include long-term outcomes for patients receiving outpatient follow-up post-discharge.

Materials and methods: The Quality of Burn Registry (QBR) Outpatient Work Group identified nine key long-term outcomes-five clinical and four psychosocial-to track after discharge from burn centers. An alpha pilot study was conducted with seven verified burn centers, collecting data on enrolled patients over 12 months in three-month intervals. A subsequent beta pilot involved ten centers, each monitoring five patients across five predefined cohorts.

Results: The alpha pilot enrolled 29 patients, revealing variable documentation and data retrieval times of up to 15 minutes per patient. The beta pilot encompassed 200 patients and recorded 1,417 appointments, averaging 7.1 visits per patient. Notably, 25% of patients were lost to follow-up, and 22% were discharged from care within 12 months. Follow-up visits were most concentrated in the first three months (53.6%).

Discussion: This study represents a pioneering effort to systematically collect long-term outcomes for major burn injury survivors during the first year post-discharge. The findings will support ongoing improvements in best practices for burn care and enhance continuity between inpatient and outpatient monitoring, ultimately benefiting quality improvement initiatives for burn-injured patients in the future.

将长期结果加入美国烧伤协会烧伤登记的过程-弥合差距的可行性。
背景:烧伤登记在加强对烧伤流行病学的了解和改善临床护理方面起着至关重要的作用。然而,当患者转到门诊治疗时,他们往往缺乏出院后结果的综合数据。本研究旨在扩大美国烧伤协会的登记,包括出院后接受门诊随访的患者的长期结果。材料和方法:烧伤质量登记(QBR)门诊工作小组确定了九个关键的长期结果-五个临床和四个心理社会-从烧伤中心出院后进行跟踪。在七家经过验证的烧伤中心进行了一项初步研究,以三个月为间隔收集了12个月的入组患者的数据。随后的测试试点涉及十个中心,每个中心监测五个预先确定的队列中的五个患者。结果:alpha试点招募了29名患者,揭示了每个患者高达15分钟的可变文档和数据检索时间。测试试点包括200名患者,记录了1417次预约,平均每位患者7.1次就诊。值得注意的是,25%的患者失去了随访,22%的患者在12个月内出院。随访最集中在前3个月(53.6%)。讨论:这项研究代表了一项开创性的努力,系统地收集出院后第一年主要烧伤幸存者的长期结果。研究结果将支持烧伤护理最佳实践的持续改进,增强住院和门诊监测之间的连续性,最终有利于未来烧伤患者的质量改进倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信