Adopting machine learning to predict nomogram for small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Pan Liu, Xiaochen Gu, Yexuan Jiao, Xinqi Ye, Yu-Hang Zhou, Xinlin Wang, Yongjin Zhou, Zhengbo Shao
{"title":"Adopting machine learning to predict nomogram for small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).","authors":"Pan Liu, Xiaochen Gu, Yexuan Jiao, Xinqi Ye, Yu-Hang Zhou, Xinlin Wang, Yongjin Zhou, Zhengbo Shao","doi":"10.1007/s10792-025-03520-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To predict nomogram for small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using machine learning technology and preoperative clinical data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1025 eyes with postoperative spherical equivalent within ± 0.50D after SMILE were included in this study. The XGBoost, gradient boosting regression (GBR), random forest (RF), LightGBM, linear regression (LR) and support vector regression (SVR) were applied to predict the nomogram. The performance of six machine learning methods was assessed by calculating the root mean absolute error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE). Four junior residents were selected to design the nomogram based on preoperative clinical data in testing set, and were compared with the machine learning models by calculating the accuracy of eyes within three specific thresholds (± 0.05D, ± 0.15D, ± 0.25D).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The actual nomogram was not significantly different from the nomogram predicted machine learning methods (P > 0.05). The RMSE of six models ranged from 0.075 to 0.110, and MAE were 0.055 to 0.085 on nomogram prediction. The XGBoost provided significantly higher accuracy within 0.05 to 0.25 D than the SVR and junior residents (McNemar test, P < 0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences in accuracy within 0.05 to 0.25 D that the XGBoost, GBR, RF, LightGBM, and LR achieved (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning of the preoperative clinical data could accurately predict nomogram for SMILE. The machine learning methods may assist the refractive surgeons and shorten the learning curve of junior residents while making the nomogram adjustment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"45 1","pages":"175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03520-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To predict nomogram for small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using machine learning technology and preoperative clinical data.

Methods: A total of 1025 eyes with postoperative spherical equivalent within ± 0.50D after SMILE were included in this study. The XGBoost, gradient boosting regression (GBR), random forest (RF), LightGBM, linear regression (LR) and support vector regression (SVR) were applied to predict the nomogram. The performance of six machine learning methods was assessed by calculating the root mean absolute error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE). Four junior residents were selected to design the nomogram based on preoperative clinical data in testing set, and were compared with the machine learning models by calculating the accuracy of eyes within three specific thresholds (± 0.05D, ± 0.15D, ± 0.25D).

Results: The actual nomogram was not significantly different from the nomogram predicted machine learning methods (P > 0.05). The RMSE of six models ranged from 0.075 to 0.110, and MAE were 0.055 to 0.085 on nomogram prediction. The XGBoost provided significantly higher accuracy within 0.05 to 0.25 D than the SVR and junior residents (McNemar test, P < 0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences in accuracy within 0.05 to 0.25 D that the XGBoost, GBR, RF, LightGBM, and LR achieved (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Machine learning of the preoperative clinical data could accurately predict nomogram for SMILE. The machine learning methods may assist the refractive surgeons and shorten the learning curve of junior residents while making the nomogram adjustment.

采用机器学习预测小切口晶状体提取术(SMILE)的形态图。
目的:利用机器学习技术和术前临床资料预测小切口晶状体摘除术(SMILE)的形态图。方法:选取SMILE术后球面等效度在±0.50D内的1025只眼。采用XGBoost、梯度增强回归(GBR)、随机森林(RF)、LightGBM、线性回归(LR)和支持向量回归(SVR)对正态图进行预测。通过计算均方根绝对误差(RMSE)和均方根绝对误差(MAE)来评估六种机器学习方法的性能。选取4名初级住院医师根据测试集中的术前临床数据设计nomogram,并通过计算眼睛在±0.05D、±0.15D、±0.25D三个特定阈值内的准确率与机器学习模型进行比较。结果:实际模态图与模态图预测机器学习方法无显著差异(P < 0.05)。6个模型的均方根误差(RMSE)在0.075 ~ 0.110之间,拟合方差(MAE)在0.055 ~ 0.085之间。XGBoost在0.05 ~ 0.25 D范围内的准确性显著高于SVR和初级居民(McNemar检验,P 0.05)。结论:术前临床资料的机器学习可以准确预测SMILE的nomogram。机器学习方法可以辅助屈光外科医生,缩短初级住院医师在进行图形调整时的学习曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信