Development of a model combining CEUS LI-RADS and clinical features for predicting glypican-3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Fen Huang, Jinshu Pang, Yuquan Wu, Yueting Sun, Rong Wen, Xiumei Bai, Wanxian Nong, Ruizhi Gao, Yun He, Cuiling Li, Guangliang Huang, Hong Yang
{"title":"Development of a model combining CEUS LI-RADS and clinical features for predicting glypican-3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Fen Huang, Jinshu Pang, Yuquan Wu, Yueting Sun, Rong Wen, Xiumei Bai, Wanxian Nong, Ruizhi Gao, Yun He, Cuiling Li, Guangliang Huang, Hong Yang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04861-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish a predictive model incorporating clinical features and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for predicting glypican-3 (GPC3) expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 142 HCC patients between January 2020 to June 2021 in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent CEUS before surgery, and the reference standard was immunohistochemical analysis of surgical specimen. The clinical features, conventional ultrasound features, and CEUS LI-RADS features of patients in the GPC3-positive and GPC3-negative groups were evaluated and compared. The variables screened by multivariable logistic regression were used to develop a model for predicting GPC3 expression and the predictive precision and clinical utility of the model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 142 HCC patients, 96 (67.6%) were classified as LR-4/5 lesions, 46 (32.4%) were classified as LR-M lesions, 101 (71.1%) were GPC3-positive and 41 (28.9%) were negative. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that younger age (OR = 0.947; 95% CI: 0.910-0.985; p = 0.007), alpha-fetoprotein > 400 ng/ml (OR = 5.202; 95% CI: 1.808-14.966; p = 0.002) and LI-RADS M (OR = 2.822; 95% CI: 1.101-7.236; p = 0.031) was independent risk factors for GPC3-positive HCC. The model combining clinical features and LI-RADS categories showed better performance than single variable, with AUC of 0.759 (p < 0.05). The nomogram and decision curves revealed substantial clinical benefit of the prediction model in predicting GPC3 expression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined model incorporating clinical features and CEUS LI-RADS achieved a satisfactory performance for predicting GPC3 expression in HCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04861-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To establish a predictive model incorporating clinical features and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for predicting glypican-3 (GPC3) expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: A total of 142 HCC patients between January 2020 to June 2021 in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent CEUS before surgery, and the reference standard was immunohistochemical analysis of surgical specimen. The clinical features, conventional ultrasound features, and CEUS LI-RADS features of patients in the GPC3-positive and GPC3-negative groups were evaluated and compared. The variables screened by multivariable logistic regression were used to develop a model for predicting GPC3 expression and the predictive precision and clinical utility of the model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and decision curve analysis.

Results: Among the 142 HCC patients, 96 (67.6%) were classified as LR-4/5 lesions, 46 (32.4%) were classified as LR-M lesions, 101 (71.1%) were GPC3-positive and 41 (28.9%) were negative. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that younger age (OR = 0.947; 95% CI: 0.910-0.985; p = 0.007), alpha-fetoprotein > 400 ng/ml (OR = 5.202; 95% CI: 1.808-14.966; p = 0.002) and LI-RADS M (OR = 2.822; 95% CI: 1.101-7.236; p = 0.031) was independent risk factors for GPC3-positive HCC. The model combining clinical features and LI-RADS categories showed better performance than single variable, with AUC of 0.759 (p < 0.05). The nomogram and decision curves revealed substantial clinical benefit of the prediction model in predicting GPC3 expression.

Conclusion: The combined model incorporating clinical features and CEUS LI-RADS achieved a satisfactory performance for predicting GPC3 expression in HCC patients.

结合超声造影LI-RADS和临床特征预测glypican-3在肝细胞癌中的表达的模型的建立。
目的:建立结合临床特征和超声造影(CEUS)肝脏影像报告与数据系统(LI-RADS)的预测模型,预测glypican-3 (GPC3)在肝细胞癌(HCC)中的表达。方法:回顾性分析我院2020年1月至2021年6月收治的142例HCC患者。所有患者术前均行超声造影,参照标准为手术标本免疫组化分析。比较gpc3阳性组和gpc3阴性组患者的临床特征、常规超声特征、超声造影(CEUS) LI-RADS特征。利用多变量logistic回归筛选的变量建立预测GPC3表达的模型,并通过受试者工作特征分析和决策曲线分析评估模型的预测精度和临床实用性。结果:142例HCC患者中,分级为LR-4/5型96例(67.6%),分级为LR-M型46例(32.4%),gpc3阳性101例(71.1%),阴性41例(28.9%)。多变量logistic回归分析显示,年龄越小(OR = 0.947;95% ci: 0.910-0.985;p = 0.007),甲胎蛋白> 400 ng / ml (OR = 5.202;95% ci: 1.808-14.966;p = 0.002)和LI-RADS M (OR = 2.822;95% ci: 1.101-7.236;p = 0.031)是gpc3阳性HCC的独立危险因素。结合临床特征和LI-RADS分类的模型表现优于单变量模型,AUC为0.759 (p)。结论:结合临床特征和CEUS LI-RADS的联合模型预测HCC患者GPC3表达的效果令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信