Isolated Zone 2 and Zone 3 Cementless Tibial Fixation Shows Early Promise in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-03-05 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-025-01354-0
Adit R Maniar, Gregory S Kazarian, Ricardo J Torres-Ramirez, Amar S Ranawat
{"title":"Isolated Zone 2 and Zone 3 Cementless Tibial Fixation Shows Early Promise in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Adit R Maniar, Gregory S Kazarian, Ricardo J Torres-Ramirez, Amar S Ranawat","doi":"10.1007/s43465-025-01354-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty(rTKA) should occur in at least 2 zones(epiphysis, metaphysis, or diaphysis) to maximize fixation strength. We report here the short-term survivorship of unsupported tibial base plates in rTKA when used with a cementless metaphyseal sleeve and non-cemented stem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing rTKA between 2014 and 2021 by a single surgeon at a single institute. We identified 17 patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age at surgery was 66.4 years (range 50-80) and the average BMI was 34.6 (range 22.4-43.3). One patient had Type 1 and 16 patients had Type 2 bone loss preoperatively (Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute classification). Two patients (11.8%) received a standard posterior stabilized insert, nine patients (52.9%) received a varus valgus constrained insert and the remaining 6 (35.3%) patients received a hinged implant. There were no cases of revision for loosening, fracture or mechanical failure of the tibial component construct at an average follow up of 2.9 years (maximum 7.9 years). One patient required revision for end of stem pain. Only 1 patient developed subsidence (≤ 3 mm) but did not have any clinical mechanical symptoms suggestive of loosening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We report a 100% survivorship free of revision for loosening or mechanical failure of the tibial construct at short term follow up when using an unsupported tibial base plate with a metaphyseal sleeve and non-cemented stem. Based on early data, metaphyseal sleeves with a stable stem fixation in the tibia can be used without additional tibial tray fixation with cement.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"59 5","pages":"673-680"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01354-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty(rTKA) should occur in at least 2 zones(epiphysis, metaphysis, or diaphysis) to maximize fixation strength. We report here the short-term survivorship of unsupported tibial base plates in rTKA when used with a cementless metaphyseal sleeve and non-cemented stem.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing rTKA between 2014 and 2021 by a single surgeon at a single institute. We identified 17 patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

Results: The average age at surgery was 66.4 years (range 50-80) and the average BMI was 34.6 (range 22.4-43.3). One patient had Type 1 and 16 patients had Type 2 bone loss preoperatively (Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute classification). Two patients (11.8%) received a standard posterior stabilized insert, nine patients (52.9%) received a varus valgus constrained insert and the remaining 6 (35.3%) patients received a hinged implant. There were no cases of revision for loosening, fracture or mechanical failure of the tibial component construct at an average follow up of 2.9 years (maximum 7.9 years). One patient required revision for end of stem pain. Only 1 patient developed subsidence (≤ 3 mm) but did not have any clinical mechanical symptoms suggestive of loosening.

Conclusion: We report a 100% survivorship free of revision for loosening or mechanical failure of the tibial construct at short term follow up when using an unsupported tibial base plate with a metaphyseal sleeve and non-cemented stem. Based on early data, metaphyseal sleeves with a stable stem fixation in the tibia can be used without additional tibial tray fixation with cement.

孤立的2区和3区无骨水泥胫骨固定在翻修全膝关节置换术中显示出早期的希望。
背景:翻修全膝关节置换术(rTKA)的固定应至少在2个区域(骨骺、干骺或骨干)进行,以最大限度地提高固定强度。我们在此报告无骨水泥干骺端套筒和非骨水泥干骺端使用rTKA时无支撑胫骨基底板的短期存活情况。方法:我们回顾性分析了2014年至2021年间由同一位外科医生在同一研究所接受rTKA的所有患者。我们确定了17例患者,随访时间至少为1年。结果:手术时平均年龄为66.4岁(50 ~ 80岁),平均BMI为34.6(22.4 ~ 43.3)。术前1型骨质流失1例,2型骨质流失16例(安德森骨科研究所分类)。2例(11.8%)患者接受标准后路稳定植入物,9例(52.9%)患者接受外翻受限植入物,其余6例(35.3%)患者接受铰链植入物。在平均随访2.9年(最长7.9年)期间,没有因胫骨构件结构松动、骨折或机械故障而进行翻修的病例。1例患者因茎端疼痛需要翻修。只有1例患者出现下沉(≤3mm),但没有任何提示松动的临床机械症状。结论:我们报告了在短期随访中使用无支撑的胫骨基板与干骺端套筒和非胶结柄时,100%的存活率没有因胫骨结构松动或机械故障而进行翻修。根据早期资料,干骺端套筒在胫骨内固定稳定,无需额外的骨水泥胫骨托盘固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信