Adam M Deane, François Lauzier, Neill K J Adhikari, François Lamontagne, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Lehana Thabane, David Williamson, Salmaan Kanji, Jeffrey F Barletta, Simon Finfer, Yaseen Arabi, Marlies Ostermann, John C Marshall, Nicole L Zytaruk, Miranda Hardie, Naomi E Hammond, Gordon Guyatt, Kyle C White, Karen E A Burns, Joanna C Dionne, Paul J Young, Deborah J Cook
{"title":"Risk Factors for Patient-Important Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.","authors":"Adam M Deane, François Lauzier, Neill K J Adhikari, François Lamontagne, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Lehana Thabane, David Williamson, Salmaan Kanji, Jeffrey F Barletta, Simon Finfer, Yaseen Arabi, Marlies Ostermann, John C Marshall, Nicole L Zytaruk, Miranda Hardie, Naomi E Hammond, Gordon Guyatt, Kyle C White, Karen E A Burns, Joanna C Dionne, Paul J Young, Deborah J Cook","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Patient-important gastrointestinal bleeding is an endpoint developed by patients and family members; however, risk factors for this outcome are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify risk factors for patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding among invasively ventilated adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pre-planned regression analysis of an international trial database evaluated baseline and time-varying risk factors in the preceding 3 days for patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding, accounting for illness severity and the competing risk of death.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in the ICU among 131 of 4,821 (2.7%) patients. Baseline APACHE II score (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.24 [95%CI 1.12, 1.37] per 5-point increase), and the following were associated with greater risk of patient-important bleeding: inotropes or vasopressors (HR 2.05 [1.35, 3.12]), severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L) (HR 2.21 [1.24, 3.94]) and platelet inhibitor drugs (HR 1.69 [1.11, 2.56]). A lower bleeding risk was associated with pantoprazole (HR 0.36 [0.25, 0.54]) and enteral nutrition (HR 0.81 [0.68, 0.97]) for every 500 mL/day increase. There was no interaction between enteral nutrition and pantoprazole (interaction p value=0.94). Allocation to pantoprazole was associated with a lower risk of patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding irrespective of the volume of enteral nutrition (HR 0.36 [0.22, 0.58] for 500ml/day, and HR 0.36 [0.18, 0.72] for no enteral nutrition). The association of enteral nutrition and bleeding was similar with pantoprazole (HR 0.82 [0.63, 1.07]) or without pantoprazole (HR 0.81 [0.66, 1.00]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several factors are associated with the risk of patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding during invasive ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":"None"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale: Patient-important gastrointestinal bleeding is an endpoint developed by patients and family members; however, risk factors for this outcome are unknown.
Objective: To identify risk factors for patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding among invasively ventilated adults.
Methods: This pre-planned regression analysis of an international trial database evaluated baseline and time-varying risk factors in the preceding 3 days for patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding, accounting for illness severity and the competing risk of death.
Measurements and main results: Patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in the ICU among 131 of 4,821 (2.7%) patients. Baseline APACHE II score (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.24 [95%CI 1.12, 1.37] per 5-point increase), and the following were associated with greater risk of patient-important bleeding: inotropes or vasopressors (HR 2.05 [1.35, 3.12]), severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50 × 109/L) (HR 2.21 [1.24, 3.94]) and platelet inhibitor drugs (HR 1.69 [1.11, 2.56]). A lower bleeding risk was associated with pantoprazole (HR 0.36 [0.25, 0.54]) and enteral nutrition (HR 0.81 [0.68, 0.97]) for every 500 mL/day increase. There was no interaction between enteral nutrition and pantoprazole (interaction p value=0.94). Allocation to pantoprazole was associated with a lower risk of patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding irrespective of the volume of enteral nutrition (HR 0.36 [0.22, 0.58] for 500ml/day, and HR 0.36 [0.18, 0.72] for no enteral nutrition). The association of enteral nutrition and bleeding was similar with pantoprazole (HR 0.82 [0.63, 1.07]) or without pantoprazole (HR 0.81 [0.66, 1.00]).
Conclusions: Several factors are associated with the risk of patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding during invasive ventilation.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.