Reduction of biopsy rate in BI-RADS4 breast lesions: potential of an abbreviated advanced DWI protocol.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11604-2
Mariko Goto, Denis Le Bihan, Koji Sakai, Kei Yamada
{"title":"Reduction of biopsy rate in BI-RADS4 breast lesions: potential of an abbreviated advanced DWI protocol.","authors":"Mariko Goto, Denis Le Bihan, Koji Sakai, Kei Yamada","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11604-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared the diagnostic performance of diffusion biomarkers estimated from an abbreviated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) protocol and assessed their potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies of benign BI-RADS 4 lesions identified on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted from 2019 to 2023. All patients underwent abbreviated DWI at 3 T with four b-values (0 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, 200 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, 800 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, and 1500 s/mm<sup>2</sup>). Regions of interest were manually placed on DWI, and biomarkers, including the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC<sub>0-800</sub>), perfusion fraction intravoxel incoherent motion, non-Gaussian diffusion (ADC<sub>0</sub> and kurtosis [K]), signature index (S-index), and shifted ADC (sADC), were estimated. Diagnostic performance and the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies were evaluated for each parameter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 168 female patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 56.2 ± 13.5 years) with 178 BI-RADS 4 lesions on DCE MRI were analyzed. The median ADC<sub>0-800</sub>, sADC, and ADC<sub>0</sub> were significantly lower in malignant lesions, while S-index and K were significantly higher (all p ≤ 0.001). The diagnostic performance to reclassify lesions as benign or malignant was identical for ADC<sub>0-800</sub> (area under the curve = 0.67), sADC (0.69), S-index (0.69), ADC<sub>0</sub> (0.68), and K (0.66). Applying an ad-hoc threshold cutoff, all parameters reduced unnecessary biopsies (around 16%), while K resulted in a slightly higher reduction rate than ADC<sub>0-800</sub> (20.5% vs 15.9%, p = 0.317) without reducing sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diffusion MRI biomarkers obtained using an abbreviated DWI protocol reduced unnecessary biopsies in BI-RADS 4 lesions, with K performing slightly better than ADC.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question MRI BI-RADS category 4 includes a substantial number of benign lesions, and reducing unnecessary biopsies remains a critical clinical concern. Findings The parameters from abbreviated DWI show lesion differentiation comparable to ADC and have greater potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies. Clinical relevance This study underscores the potential of imaging biomarkers from abbreviated DWI for assessing breast MRI BI-RADS 4 lesions. These biomarkers may be comparable or superior to standard ADC in reducing unnecessary biopsies and could aid in improving patient management decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"6421-6432"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11604-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the diagnostic performance of diffusion biomarkers estimated from an abbreviated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) protocol and assessed their potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies of benign BI-RADS 4 lesions identified on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from 2019 to 2023. All patients underwent abbreviated DWI at 3 T with four b-values (0 s/mm2, 200 s/mm2, 800 s/mm2, and 1500 s/mm2). Regions of interest were manually placed on DWI, and biomarkers, including the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC0-800), perfusion fraction intravoxel incoherent motion, non-Gaussian diffusion (ADC0 and kurtosis [K]), signature index (S-index), and shifted ADC (sADC), were estimated. Diagnostic performance and the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies were evaluated for each parameter.

Results: In total, 168 female patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 56.2 ± 13.5 years) with 178 BI-RADS 4 lesions on DCE MRI were analyzed. The median ADC0-800, sADC, and ADC0 were significantly lower in malignant lesions, while S-index and K were significantly higher (all p ≤ 0.001). The diagnostic performance to reclassify lesions as benign or malignant was identical for ADC0-800 (area under the curve = 0.67), sADC (0.69), S-index (0.69), ADC0 (0.68), and K (0.66). Applying an ad-hoc threshold cutoff, all parameters reduced unnecessary biopsies (around 16%), while K resulted in a slightly higher reduction rate than ADC0-800 (20.5% vs 15.9%, p = 0.317) without reducing sensitivity.

Conclusion: Diffusion MRI biomarkers obtained using an abbreviated DWI protocol reduced unnecessary biopsies in BI-RADS 4 lesions, with K performing slightly better than ADC.

Key points: Question MRI BI-RADS category 4 includes a substantial number of benign lesions, and reducing unnecessary biopsies remains a critical clinical concern. Findings The parameters from abbreviated DWI show lesion differentiation comparable to ADC and have greater potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies. Clinical relevance This study underscores the potential of imaging biomarkers from abbreviated DWI for assessing breast MRI BI-RADS 4 lesions. These biomarkers may be comparable or superior to standard ADC in reducing unnecessary biopsies and could aid in improving patient management decisions.

降低BI-RADS4乳腺病变的活检率:缩短晚期DWI方案的潜力。
目的:本研究比较了通过简化弥散加权成像(DWI)方案估计的弥散生物标志物的诊断性能,并评估了它们在减少动态对比增强(DCE) MRI发现的良性BI-RADS 4病变不必要活检方面的潜力。方法:2019 - 2023年进行回顾性研究。所有患者在3t时均行DWI缩短,4个b值(0 s/mm2、200 s/mm2、800 s/mm2和1500 s/mm2)。人工将感兴趣的区域放置在DWI上,并估计生物标志物,包括表观扩散系数(ADC0-800)、灌注分数在体素内非相干运动、非高斯扩散(ADC0和峰度[K])、特征指数(S-index)和移位ADC (sADC)。对每个参数的诊断性能和减少不必要活检的可能性进行了评估。结果:共分析168例女性患者(平均年龄±标准差,56.2±13.5岁),DCE MRI上BI-RADS 4病变178个。恶性病变中位数ADC0-800、sADC、ADC0均显著降低,s指数、K均显著升高(p均≤0.001)。ADC0-800(曲线下面积= 0.67)、sADC(0.69)、s指数(0.69)、ADC0(0.68)和K(0.66)对病变进行良恶性再分类的诊断性能相同。应用特设阈值切断,所有参数都减少了不必要的活检(约16%),而K的减少率略高于ADC0-800 (20.5% vs 15.9%, p = 0.317),而不降低灵敏度。结论:使用简化DWI方案获得的弥散MRI生物标志物减少了BI-RADS 4病变中不必要的活检,K的表现略好于ADC。MRI BI-RADS第4类包括大量良性病变,减少不必要的活检仍然是一个关键的临床问题。缩短DWI参数显示病变分化与ADC相当,有更大的潜力减少不必要的活检。本研究强调了缩短DWI成像生物标志物在评估乳腺MRI BI-RADS 4病变方面的潜力。这些生物标志物在减少不必要的活检方面可能与标准ADC相当或优于标准ADC,并有助于改善患者的管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信