Efficacy of Rebamipide in the Prevention of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug-Induced Gastrointestinal Mucosal Breaks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Rochelle Ivy A Cion, Ian Gabriel A Juyad, Eric B Yasay
{"title":"Efficacy of Rebamipide in the Prevention of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug-Induced Gastrointestinal Mucosal Breaks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rochelle Ivy A Cion, Ian Gabriel A Juyad, Eric B Yasay","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most used medications worldwide. A major limitation of these drugs is gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal injury. Several gastroprotective agents have been recommended but are limited by their long-term effects. Rebamipide is a promising mucoprotective agent, but its efficacy is not established. We performed a meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of rebamipide in preventing NSAID-induced GI mucosal breaks as compared with placebo and the standard proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2023 for randomized controlled trials that compared rebamipide with placebo or PPIs. Data were pooled to obtain the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed with I2 statistic and funnel plot, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 472 studies were screened, with 13 studies included. Pooled analyses showed that rebamipide significantly reduced the incidence of NSAID-induced GI mucosal breaks as compared with placebo (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.99, P ≤ 0.00001). Rebamipide is also comparable with the standard PPIs in preventing NSAID-induced mucosal breaks (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.51-1.95, P = 1.00). Regarding addition of rebamipide to PPIs, there are still insufficient data to support its effect on further improving prevention of GI mucosal breaks as compared with PPIs alone (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.43-1.21; P = 0.11).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Rebamipide is effective in preventing NSAID-induced GI mucosal breaks. Rebamipide may also be as good as the standard PPIs in preventing NSAID-induced GI mucosal breaks and, hence, may be an alternative, especially in those with contraindications to long-term PPI use.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003535","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most used medications worldwide. A major limitation of these drugs is gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal injury. Several gastroprotective agents have been recommended but are limited by their long-term effects. Rebamipide is a promising mucoprotective agent, but its efficacy is not established. We performed a meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of rebamipide in preventing NSAID-induced GI mucosal breaks as compared with placebo and the standard proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs).

Methods: Four electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2023 for randomized controlled trials that compared rebamipide with placebo or PPIs. Data were pooled to obtain the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed with I2 statistic and funnel plot, respectively.

Results: A total of 472 studies were screened, with 13 studies included. Pooled analyses showed that rebamipide significantly reduced the incidence of NSAID-induced GI mucosal breaks as compared with placebo (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.99, P ≤ 0.00001). Rebamipide is also comparable with the standard PPIs in preventing NSAID-induced mucosal breaks (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.51-1.95, P = 1.00). Regarding addition of rebamipide to PPIs, there are still insufficient data to support its effect on further improving prevention of GI mucosal breaks as compared with PPIs alone (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.43-1.21; P = 0.11).

Discussion: Rebamipide is effective in preventing NSAID-induced GI mucosal breaks. Rebamipide may also be as good as the standard PPIs in preventing NSAID-induced GI mucosal breaks and, hence, may be an alternative, especially in those with contraindications to long-term PPI use.

利巴米胺预防非甾体抗炎药诱导的胃肠道粘膜破裂的疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
简介:非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)是世界范围内使用最多的药物之一。这些药物的一个主要限制是胃肠道粘膜损伤。已经推荐了几种胃保护剂,但由于其长期影响而受到限制。利巴米胺是一种很有前途的粘膜保护剂,但其疗效尚未确定。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,评估了与安慰剂和标准质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)相比,利巴米胺在预防非甾体抗炎药诱导的胃肠道(GI)粘膜破裂方面的疗效。方法:检索4个电子数据库,从建立到2023年10月,将利巴米胺与安慰剂或PPIs进行比较的随机对照试验。合并数据获得95%置信区间的风险比(RR)。异质性和发表偏倚分别采用I2统计量和漏斗图进行评估。结果:共筛选472项研究,纳入13项研究。合并分析显示,与安慰剂相比,利巴米胺显著降低了非甾体抗炎药引起的胃肠道粘膜破裂的发生率[RR: 0.55, 95%CI 0.31-0.99, p≤0.00001]。瑞巴米胺在预防非甾体抗炎药引起的粘膜破裂方面也与标准ppi相当[RR: 1.00, 95%CI 0.51-1.95, p=1.00]。关于在PPIs中添加利巴米胺,与单独使用PPIs相比,仍没有足够的数据支持其对进一步改善胃肠道粘膜破裂的预防作用[RR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.43-1.21;p = 0.11)。结论:利巴米胺可有效预防非甾体抗炎药引起的胃肠道粘膜破裂。在预防非甾体抗炎药引起的胃肠道粘膜破裂方面,利巴米胺可能与标准PPI一样好,因此可能是一种替代方案,特别是对于那些长期使用PPI的禁忌症患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信