The presence of abnormal palpatory findings in the sacrococcygeal area is correlated with chronic pelvic pain: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
International Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1007/s11255-025-04521-2
Daniele Origo, Fulvio Dal Farra, Marco Tramontano
{"title":"The presence of abnormal palpatory findings in the sacrococcygeal area is correlated with chronic pelvic pain: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Daniele Origo, Fulvio Dal Farra, Marco Tramontano","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04521-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines the prevalence of abnormal palpatory findings (APFs) in the different pelvic areas among individuals with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPP-CPPS) and assesses correlations between APFs and clinical and psychosocial symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 326 participants (162 CPP-CPPS patients, 164 controls) underwent a standardized palpatory assessment of the sacroiliac, sacrococcygeal, and pelvic floor regions. The manual procedure was performed by two expert physiotherapists with a certification in osteopathic manipulation, following a consensus training. We assessed symptom severity and psychosocial variables using the NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ). Correlation analyses explored relationships between APFs, the presence of pain, and psychosocial variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>APFs were significantly associated with CPP/CPPS, particularly in the sacrococcygeal (r = 0.609, p < 0.01) and pelvic floor (r = 0.620, p < 0.01) regions, indicating a moderate-to-strong correlation. The multivariate analysis confirmed that sacrococcygeal APFs (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.96-4.65, p < 0.001) and pelvic floor APFs (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.87-4.78, p < 0.001) were independently associated with CPP/CPPS, whereas sacroiliac findings showed a weak correlation. The correlations between APFs and psychosocial issues (anxiety, depression, fear-avoidance) were weak (r = 0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sacrococcygeal and pelvic floor APFs appear to be important clinical markers of CPP/CPPS. Their presence may help identify patients who could benefit from targeted manual therapy as part of multimodal management. Further research should evaluate the prognostic value of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"3521-3531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04521-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the prevalence of abnormal palpatory findings (APFs) in the different pelvic areas among individuals with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPP-CPPS) and assesses correlations between APFs and clinical and psychosocial symptoms.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 326 participants (162 CPP-CPPS patients, 164 controls) underwent a standardized palpatory assessment of the sacroiliac, sacrococcygeal, and pelvic floor regions. The manual procedure was performed by two expert physiotherapists with a certification in osteopathic manipulation, following a consensus training. We assessed symptom severity and psychosocial variables using the NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ). Correlation analyses explored relationships between APFs, the presence of pain, and psychosocial variables.

Results: APFs were significantly associated with CPP/CPPS, particularly in the sacrococcygeal (r = 0.609, p < 0.01) and pelvic floor (r = 0.620, p < 0.01) regions, indicating a moderate-to-strong correlation. The multivariate analysis confirmed that sacrococcygeal APFs (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.96-4.65, p < 0.001) and pelvic floor APFs (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.87-4.78, p < 0.001) were independently associated with CPP/CPPS, whereas sacroiliac findings showed a weak correlation. The correlations between APFs and psychosocial issues (anxiety, depression, fear-avoidance) were weak (r = 0.25).

Conclusions: Sacrococcygeal and pelvic floor APFs appear to be important clinical markers of CPP/CPPS. Their presence may help identify patients who could benefit from targeted manual therapy as part of multimodal management. Further research should evaluate the prognostic value of these findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

骶尾骨区触诊异常与慢性盆腔疼痛相关:一项横断面研究。
目的:研究慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(cppp - cpps)患者不同骨盆区域异常触诊表现(APFs)的发生率,并评估APFs与临床和心理社会症状的相关性。方法:在这项横断面研究中,326名参与者(162名CPP-CPPS患者,164名对照组)接受了骶髂、骶尾骨和骨盆底区域的标准化触诊评估。手动程序由两名具有整骨疗法操作认证的专家物理治疗师执行,经过共识培训。我们使用美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH- cpsi)、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)和恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ)评估症状严重程度和社会心理变量。相关分析探讨了apf、疼痛的存在和社会心理变量之间的关系。结果:APFs与CPP/CPPS有显著相关性,尤其是骶尾骨APFs (r = 0.609, p)。结论:骶尾骨APFs和盆底APFs是CPP/CPPS的重要临床指标。他们的存在可能有助于确定哪些患者可以从靶向手工治疗中获益,作为多模式治疗的一部分。进一步的研究应评估这些发现的预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信