Risk factors for airplane headache: A multivariable logistic regression analysis in a population of career flight personnel.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1177/03331024251329837
Johannes Prottengeier, Isabelle Kaiser, Andreas Moritz, Fabian Konrad
{"title":"Risk factors for airplane headache: A multivariable logistic regression analysis in a population of career flight personnel.","authors":"Johannes Prottengeier, Isabelle Kaiser, Andreas Moritz, Fabian Konrad","doi":"10.1177/03331024251329837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionAirplane headache (AH) is a lesser-known headache disorder that occurs during and is caused by air travel. Although considered rare and current prevalence figures vary widely, it potentially affects millions annually. Risk factors for AH have not yet been adequately investigated, and so the present study aimed to identify risk factors associated with AH among a large cohort of frequent flyers.MethodsWe conducted a survey using an extensive questionnaire that highlighted 30 potential risk factors for AH. We compared individuals experiencing AH with those without headaches and those with other types of headaches. Two multivariate logistic regression models were developed from risk variables and assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of their receiver operating characteristics, with 10-fold cross-validation applied for reliability.ResultsIn total, 2237 questionnaires were analysed; 279 participants reported aircraft headache, while 1563 reported other forms of headache. Model selection resulted in two significant models: model 1, distinguishing AH from no headache, and model 2, differentiating AH from other headaches. Both models demonstrated promising accuracy, with AUC values of 0.794 and 0.595, respectively.ConclusionsAH notably affects productivity and workdays lost. The identified risk factors align with risk factors for headache in general, as well as headache at high altitudes. Interestingly, folic acid supplementation could have a positive, protective effect. Further research is warranted to explore these relationships and potential preventive strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 4","pages":"3331024251329837"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251329837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionAirplane headache (AH) is a lesser-known headache disorder that occurs during and is caused by air travel. Although considered rare and current prevalence figures vary widely, it potentially affects millions annually. Risk factors for AH have not yet been adequately investigated, and so the present study aimed to identify risk factors associated with AH among a large cohort of frequent flyers.MethodsWe conducted a survey using an extensive questionnaire that highlighted 30 potential risk factors for AH. We compared individuals experiencing AH with those without headaches and those with other types of headaches. Two multivariate logistic regression models were developed from risk variables and assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of their receiver operating characteristics, with 10-fold cross-validation applied for reliability.ResultsIn total, 2237 questionnaires were analysed; 279 participants reported aircraft headache, while 1563 reported other forms of headache. Model selection resulted in two significant models: model 1, distinguishing AH from no headache, and model 2, differentiating AH from other headaches. Both models demonstrated promising accuracy, with AUC values of 0.794 and 0.595, respectively.ConclusionsAH notably affects productivity and workdays lost. The identified risk factors align with risk factors for headache in general, as well as headache at high altitudes. Interestingly, folic acid supplementation could have a positive, protective effect. Further research is warranted to explore these relationships and potential preventive strategies.

飞机头痛的危险因素:职业飞行人员人群的多变量logistic回归分析。
飞机头痛(AH)是一种鲜为人知的头痛疾病,发生在航空旅行期间并由其引起。虽然被认为是罕见的,目前的流行数字差异很大,但每年可能影响数百万人。AH的危险因素尚未得到充分的调查,因此本研究旨在确定与AH相关的危险因素在大量常乘飞机的人群中。方法:我们进行了一项调查,使用了一份广泛的问卷,突出了AH的30个潜在危险因素。我们将患有AH的人与没有头痛的人以及患有其他类型头痛的人进行了比较。从风险变量中建立了两个多变量logistic回归模型,并使用受试者操作特征的曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估,并采用10倍交叉验证进行可靠性验证。结果共分析问卷2237份;279名参与者报告了飞机头痛,1563名报告了其他形式的头痛。模型选择得到两个显著模型:模型1区分AH与无头痛,模型2区分AH与其他头痛。两种模型的AUC值分别为0.794和0.595,精度均较好。结论sah对工作效率和工作日损失有显著影响。确定的风险因素与一般头痛的风险因素以及高海拔地区的头痛风险因素一致。有趣的是,补充叶酸可能有积极的保护作用。有必要进一步研究这些关系和潜在的预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信