In-Hospital Mortality after Bronchoscopy in Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Those Who Were Not: A Matched-pair Cohort Study Using A Nationwide Japanese Inpatient Database.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nobuyasu Awano, Taisuke Jo, Takehiro Izumo, Hirokazu Urushiyama, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideaki Watanabe, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"In-Hospital Mortality after Bronchoscopy in Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Those Who Were Not: A Matched-pair Cohort Study Using A Nationwide Japanese Inpatient Database.","authors":"Nobuyasu Awano, Taisuke Jo, Takehiro Izumo, Hirokazu Urushiyama, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideaki Watanabe, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.2169/internalmedicine.5253-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective The number of patients using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has recently increased. However, the association between DOAC use and bronchoscopy (BS) safety has not been elucidated. This study examined the association between BS and DOAC use and safety. Methods Using data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from July 1, 2010, to March 31, 2022, patients taking DOACs who underwent BS (n = 603, DOAC group) and those who did not (n = 187,827, non-DOAC group) were identified. Then, 1:4 matched-pair cohort analyses were performed based on the institution, sex, age, and treatment year. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were 28-day mortality, mechanical ventilation use, pneumothorax, bleeding, and thromboembolism after BS. Results A total of 603 and 2,320 patients taking and not taking DOAC, respectively, were identified via matching. The all-cause in-hospital mortality rates in the DOAC and non-DOAC groups were 12.1% and 5.8%, respectively. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the DOAC group had a significantly higher all-cause in-hospital mortality rate than the non-DOAC group (odds ratio = 2.84, 95% confidence interval = 1.77-4.55). Secondary and composite outcomes (mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax, bleeding, and thromboembolism after BS combined) were more frequent in the DOAC group than in the non-DOAC group. Conclusions DOACs were associated with mortality and complications in patients undergoing BS. Further studies comparing BS outcomes between patients with and without DOAC treatment are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":13719,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.5253-25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective The number of patients using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has recently increased. However, the association between DOAC use and bronchoscopy (BS) safety has not been elucidated. This study examined the association between BS and DOAC use and safety. Methods Using data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from July 1, 2010, to March 31, 2022, patients taking DOACs who underwent BS (n = 603, DOAC group) and those who did not (n = 187,827, non-DOAC group) were identified. Then, 1:4 matched-pair cohort analyses were performed based on the institution, sex, age, and treatment year. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were 28-day mortality, mechanical ventilation use, pneumothorax, bleeding, and thromboembolism after BS. Results A total of 603 and 2,320 patients taking and not taking DOAC, respectively, were identified via matching. The all-cause in-hospital mortality rates in the DOAC and non-DOAC groups were 12.1% and 5.8%, respectively. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the DOAC group had a significantly higher all-cause in-hospital mortality rate than the non-DOAC group (odds ratio = 2.84, 95% confidence interval = 1.77-4.55). Secondary and composite outcomes (mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax, bleeding, and thromboembolism after BS combined) were more frequent in the DOAC group than in the non-DOAC group. Conclusions DOACs were associated with mortality and complications in patients undergoing BS. Further studies comparing BS outcomes between patients with and without DOAC treatment are necessary.

接受直接口服抗凝剂和未接受直接口服抗凝剂的患者在支气管镜检查后的住院死亡率:一项使用日本全国住院患者数据库的配对队列研究
目的近年来直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的患者数量有所增加。然而,DOAC使用与支气管镜检查(BS)安全性之间的关系尚未阐明。本研究考察了BS和DOAC使用与安全性之间的关系。方法使用日本诊断程序组合数据库2010年7月1日至2022年3月31日的数据,确定服用DOAC的BS患者(n = 603, DOAC组)和未服用DOAC的患者(n = 187,827,非DOAC组)。然后,根据机构、性别、年龄和治疗年份进行1:4配对队列分析。主要结局为全因住院死亡率。次要结局是BS后28天死亡率、机械通气使用、气胸、出血和血栓栓塞。结果通过配对确定服用和未服用DOAC的患者分别为603例和2320例。DOAC组和非DOAC组的全因住院死亡率分别为12.1%和5.8%。在多变量logistic回归分析中,DOAC组的全因住院死亡率显著高于非DOAC组(优势比= 2.84,95%可信区间= 1.77-4.55)。次要和复合结局(BS合并后的机械通气、气胸、出血和血栓栓塞)在DOAC组比非DOAC组更常见。结论DOACs与BS患者的死亡率和并发症相关。需要进一步研究比较接受和未接受DOAC治疗的患者BS预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine
Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Internal Medicine is an open-access online only journal published monthly by the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Articles must be prepared in accordance with "The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (see Annals of Internal Medicine 108: 258-265, 1988), must be contributed solely to the Internal Medicine, and become the property of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Statements contained therein are the responsibility of the author(s). The Society reserves copyright and renewal on all published material and such material may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信