Equity, power and resources in primary health care reform: insights from Aotearoa New Zealand.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Johanna Reidy, Nina Bevin, Don Matheson, Ngaire Rae, Rawiri Keenan, Peter Crampton, Max Harris
{"title":"Equity, power and resources in primary health care reform: insights from Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Johanna Reidy, Nina Bevin, Don Matheson, Ngaire Rae, Rawiri Keenan, Peter Crampton, Max Harris","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02463-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New Zealand's District Health Board reform (2000-2022) was underpinned by the goal of reducing inequities in health outcomes between population groups and improving health overall. A key policy vehicle for achieving the goal was a system-wide shift to population health with increased strategic focus on and investment in primary health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research explored shifts in power and resource to understand how equity as a policy goal for primary health care fared over the District Health Board era, and examined how the distribution of power and resources in the health sector changed for PHC over the period 2000-2020. The study used an exploratory case study methodology based on insights from key informant interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that despite policy intent, actors holding political power shaped health outcomes under the reforms, curtailing the mechanisms that could have made a significant impact on equitable health outcomes between population groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It concludes that exploring power and resource shifts sheds light on power dynamics within a reform. Since power shapes how resources are deployed, attention to power and resource complements technical elements of health system reform, by helping to understand where and how to intervene so that reforms achieve their desired goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"124"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02463-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: New Zealand's District Health Board reform (2000-2022) was underpinned by the goal of reducing inequities in health outcomes between population groups and improving health overall. A key policy vehicle for achieving the goal was a system-wide shift to population health with increased strategic focus on and investment in primary health care.

Methods: This research explored shifts in power and resource to understand how equity as a policy goal for primary health care fared over the District Health Board era, and examined how the distribution of power and resources in the health sector changed for PHC over the period 2000-2020. The study used an exploratory case study methodology based on insights from key informant interviews.

Results: The study found that despite policy intent, actors holding political power shaped health outcomes under the reforms, curtailing the mechanisms that could have made a significant impact on equitable health outcomes between population groups.

Conclusion: It concludes that exploring power and resource shifts sheds light on power dynamics within a reform. Since power shapes how resources are deployed, attention to power and resource complements technical elements of health system reform, by helping to understand where and how to intervene so that reforms achieve their desired goals.

初级卫生保健改革中的公平、权力和资源:来自新西兰奥特罗亚的见解。
背景:新西兰地区卫生委员会改革(2000-2022年)的基础是减少人口群体之间健康结果的不平等和改善整体健康的目标。实现这一目标的一个关键政策手段是全系统转向人口保健,增加对初级保健的战略重点和投资。方法:本研究探讨了权力和资源的变化,以了解公平作为初级卫生保健的政策目标在区卫生委员会时代是如何发展的,并研究了2000-2020年期间初级卫生保健卫生部门权力和资源分配的变化。该研究采用了一种探索性案例研究方法,该方法基于对关键信息提供者访谈的见解。结果:研究发现,尽管有政策意图,但掌握政治权力的行为者在改革下塑造了卫生结果,削弱了可能对人口群体之间公平的卫生结果产生重大影响的机制。结论:对权力和资源转移的探索揭示了改革中的权力动态。由于权力决定了资源的部署方式,对权力和资源的关注有助于了解在何处以及如何进行干预,从而使改革实现其预期目标,从而补充了卫生系统改革的技术要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信