Comparative analysis of three experimental methods for revealing human fecal microbial diversity.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Caiqing Yao, Yu Zhang, Lijun You, Jingjing E, Junguo Wang
{"title":"Comparative analysis of three experimental methods for revealing human fecal microbial diversity.","authors":"Caiqing Yao, Yu Zhang, Lijun You, Jingjing E, Junguo Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12866-025-03985-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to the heterogeneity of the human gut environment, the gut microbiota is complex and diverse, and has been insufficiently explored. In this study, one fresh fecal sample was cultured using 12 commercial or modified media and incubation of culture plates anaerobically and aerobically, the conventional experienced colony picking (ECP) was first used to isolate the colonies and obtain pure culture strains. On this basis, all the colonies grown on the culture plates were collected for culture-enriched metagenomic sequencing (CEMS), and the original sample was also subjected to direct culture-independent metagenomic sequencing (CIMS), the study compared the effects of three methods for analyzing the microbiota contained in the sample. It was found that compared with CEMS, conventional ECP failed to detect a large proportion of strains grown in culture media, resulting in missed detection of culturable microorganisms in the gut. Microbes identified by CEMS and CIMS showed a low degree of overlap (18% of species), whereas species identified by CEMS and CIMS alone accounted for 36.5% and 45.5%, respectively. It suggests that both culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches are essential in revealing gut microbial diversity. Moreover, based on the CEMS results, growth rate index (GRiD) values for various strains on different media were calculated to predict the optimal medium for bacterial growth; this method can be used to design new media for intestinal microbial isolation, promote the recovery of specific microbiota, and obtain new insights into the human microbiome diversity. This is among the first studies on CEMS of the human gut microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":9233,"journal":{"name":"BMC Microbiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"258"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-03985-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the heterogeneity of the human gut environment, the gut microbiota is complex and diverse, and has been insufficiently explored. In this study, one fresh fecal sample was cultured using 12 commercial or modified media and incubation of culture plates anaerobically and aerobically, the conventional experienced colony picking (ECP) was first used to isolate the colonies and obtain pure culture strains. On this basis, all the colonies grown on the culture plates were collected for culture-enriched metagenomic sequencing (CEMS), and the original sample was also subjected to direct culture-independent metagenomic sequencing (CIMS), the study compared the effects of three methods for analyzing the microbiota contained in the sample. It was found that compared with CEMS, conventional ECP failed to detect a large proportion of strains grown in culture media, resulting in missed detection of culturable microorganisms in the gut. Microbes identified by CEMS and CIMS showed a low degree of overlap (18% of species), whereas species identified by CEMS and CIMS alone accounted for 36.5% and 45.5%, respectively. It suggests that both culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches are essential in revealing gut microbial diversity. Moreover, based on the CEMS results, growth rate index (GRiD) values for various strains on different media were calculated to predict the optimal medium for bacterial growth; this method can be used to design new media for intestinal microbial isolation, promote the recovery of specific microbiota, and obtain new insights into the human microbiome diversity. This is among the first studies on CEMS of the human gut microbiota.

揭示人类粪便微生物多样性的三种实验方法的比较分析。
由于人类肠道环境的异质性,肠道微生物群是复杂多样的,尚未得到充分的探索。本研究采用12种商业或改良培养基,在培养板上进行厌氧和好氧培养,首先采用常规的经验菌落采摘法(ECP)分离菌落,获得纯培养菌株。在此基础上,收集培养板上生长的所有菌落进行培养富集宏基因组测序(CEMS),并对原始样品进行直接培养非依赖性宏基因组测序(CIMS),比较三种方法对样品中微生物群的分析效果。结果发现,与CEMS相比,常规ECP未能检测出培养基中生长的大部分菌株,导致肠道可培养微生物的漏检。CEMS和CIMS鉴定的微生物重叠程度较低(18%),而CEMS和CIMS单独鉴定的物种分别占36.5%和45.5%。这表明,培养依赖性和非培养依赖性方法在揭示肠道微生物多样性方面都是必不可少的。并根据CEMS结果,计算不同菌株在不同培养基上的生长速率指数(GRiD)值,预测细菌生长的最佳培养基;该方法可用于设计肠道微生物分离新培养基,促进特定菌群的恢复,获得对人体微生物群多样性的新认识。这是对人类肠道微生物群的CEMS的首批研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Microbiology
BMC Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Microbiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on analytical and functional studies of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and small parasites, as well as host and therapeutic responses to them and their interaction with the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信