Robot-assisted gait training for individuals with severe acquired brain injury: a scoping review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Vibeke Wagner, Jakob Rud Sørensen, Christina Kruuse, Ingrid Poulsen, Fin Biering-Sørensen, Christian Gunge Riberholt
{"title":"Robot-assisted gait training for individuals with severe acquired brain injury: a scoping review.","authors":"Vibeke Wagner, Jakob Rud Sørensen, Christina Kruuse, Ingrid Poulsen, Fin Biering-Sørensen, Christian Gunge Riberholt","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2490285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early out-of-bed mobilization is recommended for individuals with severe acquired brain injury and impaired consciousness to promote recovery. Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) utilizes robotic assistance to facilitate neuroplastic changes through repetitive training and feedback. We aimed to map the evidence of RAGT in non-ambulatory individuals with impaired consciousness or cognitive functioning, focusing on the rationales underpinning its use and the assessment methods employed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA scoping review guidelines, we systematically searched for studies involving adults with severe acquired brain injury. Source selection, data extraction, and charting were performed in duplicate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 10 444 records screened, seven were included, involving 162 participants. The studies included one randomized and two non-randomized clinical trials, two retrospective studies, and two case reports. RAGT aimed to improve physical recovery (<i>n</i> = 6), arousal stimulation (<i>n</i> = 4), and safety (<i>n</i> = 4). Twenty-six outcome measures were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review highlights a research gap in RAGT for individuals with severe brain injury and cognitive impairments. Specifically, the underlying rationales need investigation, and standardized outcome measures must be established. RAGT shows potential in improving functional recovery and consciousness, but future studies must address safety, and feasibility while navigating ethical challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2025.2490285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Early out-of-bed mobilization is recommended for individuals with severe acquired brain injury and impaired consciousness to promote recovery. Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) utilizes robotic assistance to facilitate neuroplastic changes through repetitive training and feedback. We aimed to map the evidence of RAGT in non-ambulatory individuals with impaired consciousness or cognitive functioning, focusing on the rationales underpinning its use and the assessment methods employed.

Method: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA scoping review guidelines, we systematically searched for studies involving adults with severe acquired brain injury. Source selection, data extraction, and charting were performed in duplicate.

Results: Out of 10 444 records screened, seven were included, involving 162 participants. The studies included one randomized and two non-randomized clinical trials, two retrospective studies, and two case reports. RAGT aimed to improve physical recovery (n = 6), arousal stimulation (n = 4), and safety (n = 4). Twenty-six outcome measures were reported.

Conclusion: Our review highlights a research gap in RAGT for individuals with severe brain injury and cognitive impairments. Specifically, the underlying rationales need investigation, and standardized outcome measures must be established. RAGT shows potential in improving functional recovery and consciousness, but future studies must address safety, and feasibility while navigating ethical challenges.

机器人辅助步态训练对个体与严重获得性脑损伤:范围审查。
简介:对于严重后发性脑损伤和意识受损的个体,建议尽早下床活动,以促进康复。机器人辅助步态训练(RAGT)利用机器人辅助,通过重复训练和反馈来促进神经可塑性的改变。我们的目的是在意识或认知功能受损的非活动个体中绘制RAGT的证据,重点关注其使用的基本原理和所采用的评估方法。方法:根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所和PRISMA的范围审查指南,我们系统地检索了涉及成人严重获得性脑损伤的研究。源选择、数据提取和图表制作一式两份。结果:在筛选的10444条记录中,包括7条,涉及162名参与者。这些研究包括一项随机和两项非随机临床试验,两项回顾性研究和两份病例报告。RAGT旨在改善身体恢复(n = 6)、唤醒刺激(n = 4)和安全性(n = 4)。报告了26项结果测量。结论:我们的综述突出了RAGT在重度脑损伤和认知障碍患者中的研究空白。具体而言,需要调查潜在的理由,并必须制定标准化的结果措施。RAGT显示出改善功能恢复和意识的潜力,但未来的研究必须解决安全性和可行性,同时应对伦理挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信