Immersive Extended Reality (I-XR) in Medical and Nursing for Skill Competency and Knowledge Acquisition: A Systematic Review and Implications for Pedagogical Practices.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jennifer M B Fugate, Michaela J Tonsager, Sheila L Macrine
{"title":"Immersive Extended Reality (I-XR) in Medical and Nursing for Skill Competency and Knowledge Acquisition: A Systematic Review and Implications for Pedagogical Practices.","authors":"Jennifer M B Fugate, Michaela J Tonsager, Sheila L Macrine","doi":"10.3390/bs15040468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Simulation has evolved from basic practice to Immersive Extended Reality (I-XR). This systematic review examined 56 published studies on the impact of I-XR, including virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR), on the education of medical and nursing students, specifically their skill competency, and knowledge acquisition. The results demonstrate the significant potential of I-XR in healthcare education, with 42.5% of VR studies, 42.9% of AR studies, and the single MR study also demonstrating greater improvements in clinical skills and knowledge acquisition compared to non-immersive (non-I-XR) training conditions. In contrast, only 2.5% of VR studies and 7.14% of AR studies favored non-I-XR methods. It is important, however, to acknowledge the 26.8% of studies that showed mixed results (some evidence for the I-XR methods on some outcomes, but also some evidence for the non-I-XR methods, on other outcomes). Notably, the review also identified a critical gap in the theoretical foundations of I-XR learning, highlighting the urgent need for research to inform the effective pedagogical implementation of these powerful tools. We offer a preliminary framework to address the lack of learning theory in healthcare I-XR training, with implications for pedagogical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12024058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15040468","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simulation has evolved from basic practice to Immersive Extended Reality (I-XR). This systematic review examined 56 published studies on the impact of I-XR, including virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR), on the education of medical and nursing students, specifically their skill competency, and knowledge acquisition. The results demonstrate the significant potential of I-XR in healthcare education, with 42.5% of VR studies, 42.9% of AR studies, and the single MR study also demonstrating greater improvements in clinical skills and knowledge acquisition compared to non-immersive (non-I-XR) training conditions. In contrast, only 2.5% of VR studies and 7.14% of AR studies favored non-I-XR methods. It is important, however, to acknowledge the 26.8% of studies that showed mixed results (some evidence for the I-XR methods on some outcomes, but also some evidence for the non-I-XR methods, on other outcomes). Notably, the review also identified a critical gap in the theoretical foundations of I-XR learning, highlighting the urgent need for research to inform the effective pedagogical implementation of these powerful tools. We offer a preliminary framework to address the lack of learning theory in healthcare I-XR training, with implications for pedagogical practices.

沉浸式扩展现实(I-XR)在医疗和护理技能能力和知识获取:系统回顾和对教学实践的影响。
仿真已经从基本实践发展到沉浸式扩展现实(I-XR)。本系统综述了56项已发表的关于I-XR(包括虚拟现实(VR)、增强现实(AR)和混合现实(MR))对医学和护理学生教育的影响的研究,特别是他们的技能能力和知识获取。结果表明,与非沉浸式(非I-XR)培训条件相比,42.5%的VR研究、42.9%的AR研究和单一MR研究也显示出在临床技能和知识获取方面有更大的改善。相比之下,只有2.5%的VR研究和7.14%的AR研究支持非i - xr方法。然而,重要的是要承认26.8%的研究显示出混合结果(一些证据表明I-XR方法对某些结果有利,但也有一些证据表明非I-XR方法对其他结果有利)。值得注意的是,该综述还发现了I-XR学习理论基础的一个关键缺口,强调了迫切需要进行研究,以便为这些强大工具的有效教学实施提供信息。我们提供了一个初步框架,以解决医疗保健I-XR培训中缺乏学习理论的问题,并对教学实践产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信