The complexity of socially transmitted food preferences in rodents: a model for human epistemic trust?

Abstract

Social safety learning refers to the process by which animals indirectly learn about the safety of novel stimuli. This process is critical when rodents decide what to eat since they lack the capacity to vomit, reducing their ability to expel ingested toxins. Consequently, rodents display neophobia when encountering novel food, but are more likely to eat the food when a conspecific signals its safety. This natural behavior is modeled using the social transmission of food preference (STFP) paradigm. Based on behavioral and neural insights into STFP, I argue in the current work that its acquisition may involve cognitive processes that extend beyond social safety learning. Specifically, I argue that STFP acquisition may parallel functional aspects of human epistemic trust. Epistemic trust refers to trust in communicated knowledge, enabling humans to learn from, adapt to, and respond to their (social) environment. This perspective could position the STFP paradigm as a valuable tool to investigate the neurobiology of cognitive processes that may be relevant to human epistemic trust. Given the importance of epistemic trust in therapeutic settings, understanding its neurobiology may have direct clinical implications.