The Comprehensive Analysis of Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis and Machine Learning Revealed Diagnostic Biomarkers for Breast Implant Illness Complicated with Breast Cancer.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-04-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/BCTT.S507754
Zhenfeng Huang, Huibo Wang, Hui Pang, Mengyao Zeng, Guoqiang Zhang, Feng Liu
{"title":"The Comprehensive Analysis of Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis and Machine Learning Revealed Diagnostic Biomarkers for Breast Implant Illness Complicated with Breast Cancer.","authors":"Zhenfeng Huang, Huibo Wang, Hui Pang, Mengyao Zeng, Guoqiang Zhang, Feng Liu","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S507754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>An increasing number of breast cancer (BC) patients choose prosthesis implantation after mastectomy, and the occurrence of breast implant illness (BII) has received increasing attention and the underlying molecular mechanisms have not been clearly elucidated. This study aimed to identify the crosstalk genes between BII and BC and explored their clinical value and molecular mechanism initially.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved the data from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and identified the differentially expressed genes (DEG) as well as module genes using Limma and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Enrichment analysis, the protein-protein interaction network (PPI), and machine learning algorithms were performed to explore the hub genes. We employed a nomogram and receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. Single-cell analysis disclosed variations in the expression of key genes across distinct cellular populations. The expression levels of the key genes were further confirmed in BC cell lines. Immunohistochemical analysis was utilized to examine protein levels from 25 patients with breast cancer undergoing prosthetic implant surgery. Ultimately, we deployed single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) to scrutinize the immunological profiles between the normal and BC cohorts, as well as between the non-BII and BII groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WGCNA identified 1137 common genes, whereas DEG analysis found 541 overlapping genes in BII and BC. After constructing the PPI network, 17 key genes were selected, and three potential hub genes include KRT14, KIT, ALB were chosen for nomogram creation and diagnostic assessment through machine learning. The validation of these results was conducted by examining gene expression patterns in the validation dataset, breast cancer cell lines, and BII-BC patients. However, ssGSEA uncovered different immune cell infiltration patterns in BII and BC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We pinpointed shared three central genes include KRT14, KIT, ALB and molecular pathways common to BII and BC. Shedding light on the complex mechanisms underlying these conditions and suggesting potential targets for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9106,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","volume":"17 ","pages":"305-324"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S507754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: An increasing number of breast cancer (BC) patients choose prosthesis implantation after mastectomy, and the occurrence of breast implant illness (BII) has received increasing attention and the underlying molecular mechanisms have not been clearly elucidated. This study aimed to identify the crosstalk genes between BII and BC and explored their clinical value and molecular mechanism initially.

Methods: We retrieved the data from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and identified the differentially expressed genes (DEG) as well as module genes using Limma and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Enrichment analysis, the protein-protein interaction network (PPI), and machine learning algorithms were performed to explore the hub genes. We employed a nomogram and receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. Single-cell analysis disclosed variations in the expression of key genes across distinct cellular populations. The expression levels of the key genes were further confirmed in BC cell lines. Immunohistochemical analysis was utilized to examine protein levels from 25 patients with breast cancer undergoing prosthetic implant surgery. Ultimately, we deployed single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) to scrutinize the immunological profiles between the normal and BC cohorts, as well as between the non-BII and BII groups.

Results: WGCNA identified 1137 common genes, whereas DEG analysis found 541 overlapping genes in BII and BC. After constructing the PPI network, 17 key genes were selected, and three potential hub genes include KRT14, KIT, ALB were chosen for nomogram creation and diagnostic assessment through machine learning. The validation of these results was conducted by examining gene expression patterns in the validation dataset, breast cancer cell lines, and BII-BC patients. However, ssGSEA uncovered different immune cell infiltration patterns in BII and BC.

Conclusion: We pinpointed shared three central genes include KRT14, KIT, ALB and molecular pathways common to BII and BC. Shedding light on the complex mechanisms underlying these conditions and suggesting potential targets for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

加权基因共表达网络分析和机器学习的综合分析揭示了乳房植入疾病并发乳腺癌的诊断生物标志物。
目的:越来越多的乳腺癌(breast cancer, BC)患者在乳房切除术后选择假体植入术,乳房植入病(breast implant illness, BII)的发生受到越来越多的关注,其潜在的分子机制尚未明确。本研究旨在鉴定BII与BC之间的串扰基因,初步探讨其临床价值和分子机制。方法:从基因表达图谱(Gene Expression Omnibus, GEO)和癌症基因组图谱(the Cancer Genome Atlas, TCGA)中检索数据,利用Limma和加权基因共表达网络分析(weighted Gene co-expression network analysis, WGCNA)对差异表达基因(DEG)和模块基因进行鉴定。通过富集分析、蛋白-蛋白相互作用网络(PPI)和机器学习算法来探索枢纽基因。我们采用nomogram和receiver operating characteristic curve来评估诊断的准确性。单细胞分析揭示了不同细胞群体中关键基因表达的差异。这些关键基因的表达水平在BC细胞系中得到进一步证实。免疫组织化学分析用于检测25例接受假体植入手术的乳腺癌患者的蛋白质水平。最后,我们采用单样本基因集富集分析(ssGSEA)来仔细检查正常组和BC组之间以及非BII组和BII组之间的免疫学概况。结果:WGCNA鉴定出1137个共同基因,而DEG分析在BII和BC中发现541个重叠基因。构建PPI网络后,选取17个关键基因,并选取KRT14、KIT、ALB 3个潜在枢纽基因,通过机器学习进行nomogram生成和诊断评估。通过检查验证数据集、乳腺癌细胞系和BII-BC患者的基因表达模式,对这些结果进行了验证。然而,ssGSEA揭示了BII和BC中不同的免疫细胞浸润模式。结论:我们确定了三个共同的中心基因,包括KRT14、KIT、ALB和BII和BC共有的分子通路。揭示了这些疾病背后的复杂机制,并提出了诊断和治疗策略的潜在目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信