Drug-drug interaction among elderly patients in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tekletsadik Tekleslassie Alemayehu, Gebremariam Wulie Geremew, Addisu Afrassa Tegegne, Gebresilassie Tadesse, Demis Getachew, Habtamu Semagn Ayele, Abebaw Setegn Yazie, Setegn Fentahun, Tesfaye Birhanu Abebe, Tefera Minwagaw, Yilkal Abebaw Wassie
{"title":"Drug-drug interaction among elderly patients in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tekletsadik Tekleslassie Alemayehu, Gebremariam Wulie Geremew, Addisu Afrassa Tegegne, Gebresilassie Tadesse, Demis Getachew, Habtamu Semagn Ayele, Abebaw Setegn Yazie, Setegn Fentahun, Tesfaye Birhanu Abebe, Tefera Minwagaw, Yilkal Abebaw Wassie","doi":"10.1186/s40360-025-00926-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elderly patients are at a heightened risk of drug-drug interactions due to their high prevalence of comorbidities, polypharmacy, and age-related physiological changes that alter drug metabolism and excretion. In Africa, these risks are compounded by unique healthcare challenges, including limited access to diagnostic tools, and high burdens of communicable diseases. The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence of drug-drug interactions and its associated factors among elderly patients in Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant research articles were identified from databases such as HINARI, Science Direct, Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Research Gate. Data were extracted via a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed via STATA version 11.0. Egger regression tests and funnel plot analysis were used to check for publication bias, and the I<sup>2</sup> statistic was used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also conducted to identify potential causes of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen articles were analyzed, and a total of 5651 potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) were identified in 1952 patients, resulting in an average of 2.89 pDDIs per patient. The overall prevalence of pDDIs among elderly patients was 52.53% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.40, 69.66). However, the prevalence of pDDIs ranged widely from 2.8 to 90.1%. When the severity of the interactions was considered, the prevalence of pDDIs was 20.59%, 69.4%, 34.32% and 1.59% for major, moderate, minor, and contraindicated DDIs, respectively. Polypharmacy, long hospital stays, hypertension and diabetes mellitus were identified as factors associated with pDDIs among elderly patients in Africa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DDIs are prevalent among elderly patients in Africa and are often associated with polypharmacy, prolonged hospitalizations, and the presence of chronic comorbidities, particularly hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Moderate-severity interactions were the most prevalent DDIs. The study suggests addressing this issue requires targeted interventions, including improved pharmacovigilance, enhanced prescribing practices, and integration of DDI risk assessment into routine clinical care. The study also suggests that the database itself could have modified the DDI prevalence rate. As a result, a single DDI identification database needs to be authorized; otherwise, clinical knowledge should be taken in to account when interpreting the information obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":9023,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"26 1","pages":"92"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-025-00926-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Elderly patients are at a heightened risk of drug-drug interactions due to their high prevalence of comorbidities, polypharmacy, and age-related physiological changes that alter drug metabolism and excretion. In Africa, these risks are compounded by unique healthcare challenges, including limited access to diagnostic tools, and high burdens of communicable diseases. The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence of drug-drug interactions and its associated factors among elderly patients in Africa.

Methods: Relevant research articles were identified from databases such as HINARI, Science Direct, Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Research Gate. Data were extracted via a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed via STATA version 11.0. Egger regression tests and funnel plot analysis were used to check for publication bias, and the I2 statistic was used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also conducted to identify potential causes of heterogeneity.

Results: Fifteen articles were analyzed, and a total of 5651 potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) were identified in 1952 patients, resulting in an average of 2.89 pDDIs per patient. The overall prevalence of pDDIs among elderly patients was 52.53% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.40, 69.66). However, the prevalence of pDDIs ranged widely from 2.8 to 90.1%. When the severity of the interactions was considered, the prevalence of pDDIs was 20.59%, 69.4%, 34.32% and 1.59% for major, moderate, minor, and contraindicated DDIs, respectively. Polypharmacy, long hospital stays, hypertension and diabetes mellitus were identified as factors associated with pDDIs among elderly patients in Africa.

Conclusion: DDIs are prevalent among elderly patients in Africa and are often associated with polypharmacy, prolonged hospitalizations, and the presence of chronic comorbidities, particularly hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Moderate-severity interactions were the most prevalent DDIs. The study suggests addressing this issue requires targeted interventions, including improved pharmacovigilance, enhanced prescribing practices, and integration of DDI risk assessment into routine clinical care. The study also suggests that the database itself could have modified the DDI prevalence rate. As a result, a single DDI identification database needs to be authorized; otherwise, clinical knowledge should be taken in to account when interpreting the information obtained.

非洲老年患者的药物-药物相互作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:老年患者由于其高发的合并症、多重用药以及与年龄相关的改变药物代谢和排泄的生理变化而处于药物-药物相互作用的高风险。在非洲,这些风险因独特的保健挑战而更加复杂,这些挑战包括获得诊断工具的机会有限以及传染病的高负担。本研究的目的是估计非洲老年患者中药物相互作用的患病率及其相关因素。方法:从HINARI、Science Direct、Embase、PubMed/MEDLINE、谷歌Scholar、research Gate等数据库中检索相关研究文章。数据通过Microsoft Excel电子表格提取,并通过STATA 11.0版本进行分析。采用Egger回归检验和漏斗图分析检查发表偏倚,采用I2统计量评价统计异质性。还进行了敏感性和亚组分析,以确定异质性的潜在原因。结果:共分析了15篇文献,在1952例患者中共鉴定出5651个潜在药物-药物相互作用(pddi),平均每位患者发生2.89个pddi。老年患者pddi总体患病率为52.53%(95%可信区间(CI): 35.40, 69.66)。然而,pddi的患病率从2.8到90.1%不等。当考虑相互作用的严重程度时,重度、中度、轻度和禁忌症ddi的pddi患病率分别为20.59%、69.4%、34.32%和1.59%。多种用药、长期住院、高血压和糖尿病被确定为与非洲老年患者pddi相关的因素。结论:ddi在非洲的老年患者中普遍存在,通常与多种药物、长期住院和慢性合并症有关,特别是高血压和糖尿病。中度严重相互作用是最常见的ddi。该研究表明,解决这一问题需要有针对性的干预措施,包括改进药物警戒、加强处方实践以及将DDI风险评估纳入常规临床护理。该研究还表明,数据库本身可能已经修改了DDI的患病率。因此,需要授权单一的DDI识别数据库;否则,在解释所获得的信息时应考虑到临床知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACYTOXICOLOGY&nb-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of chemically defined therapeutic and toxic agents. The journal welcomes submissions from all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology including clinical trials and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信