Uncovering Human Tooth Marks in the Search for Dog Domestication: The Case of Coímbre Cave.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animals Pub Date : 2025-05-02 DOI:10.3390/ani15091319
Idoia Claver, Verónica Estaca, María de Andrés-Herrero, Darío Herranz-Rodrigo, David Álvarez-Alonso, José Yravedra
{"title":"Uncovering Human Tooth Marks in the Search for Dog Domestication: The Case of Coímbre Cave.","authors":"Idoia Claver, Verónica Estaca, María de Andrés-Herrero, Darío Herranz-Rodrigo, David Álvarez-Alonso, José Yravedra","doi":"10.3390/ani15091319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The domestication of the dog (<i>Canis lupus familiaris</i>) is one of the oldest and most complex processes of interaction between humans and animals. This phenomenon may have begun sometime between 30 and 15 ky calBP. Archaeological and genetic studies have provided valuable insights into dog domestication, although the precise geographic location and origin of this process remain controversial and under debate. New methodologies, such as taphonomic analyses, offer opportunities to deepen our understanding of past human-dog interactions. In this context, the present study examines tooth marks found on some bone remains from the Upper Magdalenian site (15,500-13,200 cal BP) of Coímbre Cave (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias, Spain). The low incidence of carnivores at the site has raised the possibility that the tooth marks may have been produced by canids. However, a detailed taphonomic analysis combining geometric morphometrics with robust statistical methods-including MANOVA with post-hoc permutation tests-revealed that the marks identified at the site do not significantly differ from tooth marks produced by humans (<i>p</i> = 0.086). In contrast, tooth marks produced by other carnivores, such as <i>Canis lupus signatus</i> and <i>Canis lupus familiaris</i>, showed significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.003). Although our study could not confirm the presence of domesticated dogs at the Magdalenian levels of Coímbre Cave, it has documented taphonomic processes that are rarely identified in the archaeological record. Furthermore, this study highlights the potential of tooth mark analysis as a key tool for future research on human-animal interactions in archaeological contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15091319","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The domestication of the dog (Canis lupus familiaris) is one of the oldest and most complex processes of interaction between humans and animals. This phenomenon may have begun sometime between 30 and 15 ky calBP. Archaeological and genetic studies have provided valuable insights into dog domestication, although the precise geographic location and origin of this process remain controversial and under debate. New methodologies, such as taphonomic analyses, offer opportunities to deepen our understanding of past human-dog interactions. In this context, the present study examines tooth marks found on some bone remains from the Upper Magdalenian site (15,500-13,200 cal BP) of Coímbre Cave (Peñamellera Alta, Asturias, Spain). The low incidence of carnivores at the site has raised the possibility that the tooth marks may have been produced by canids. However, a detailed taphonomic analysis combining geometric morphometrics with robust statistical methods-including MANOVA with post-hoc permutation tests-revealed that the marks identified at the site do not significantly differ from tooth marks produced by humans (p = 0.086). In contrast, tooth marks produced by other carnivores, such as Canis lupus signatus and Canis lupus familiaris, showed significant differences (p < 0.003). Although our study could not confirm the presence of domesticated dogs at the Magdalenian levels of Coímbre Cave, it has documented taphonomic processes that are rarely identified in the archaeological record. Furthermore, this study highlights the potential of tooth mark analysis as a key tool for future research on human-animal interactions in archaeological contexts.

在狗的驯化过程中发现人类牙印:以Coímbre洞穴为例。
狗的驯化(Canis lupus familiaris)是人类和动物之间最古老、最复杂的互动过程之一。这种现象可能开始于30至15千磅压之间。考古学和遗传学研究为狗的驯化提供了有价值的见解,尽管这一过程的确切地理位置和起源仍然存在争议和争论。新的方法,如语音学分析,为加深我们对过去人类与狗的互动的理解提供了机会。在这种背景下,本研究检查了在西班牙阿斯图里亚斯Coímbre洞穴(Peñamellera Alta)上马格达莱尼遗址(15,500-13,200 cal BP)的一些骨头遗骸上发现的牙印。该遗址食肉动物的低发生率提高了牙印可能是犬科动物产生的可能性。然而,结合几何形态计量学和强大的统计方法(包括方差分析和事后排列测试)进行的详细地形学分析显示,在该地点发现的牙印与人类产生的牙印没有显著差异(p = 0.086)。相比之下,其他食肉动物如犬狼疮(Canis lupus signatus)和家犬狼疮(Canis lupus familiaris)产生的牙印差异显著(p < 0.003)。虽然我们的研究不能证实Coímbre洞穴的马格达莱尼时期存在家养狗,但它记录了考古记录中很少发现的地语学过程。此外,本研究强调了牙印分析作为未来考古背景下人类与动物相互作用研究的关键工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animals
Animals Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍: Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信