Predicting the Need for Tertiary Trauma Care Using a Multivariable Model: A 4-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.9 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2581
Piraya Vichiensanth, Kantawat Leepayakhun, Chaiyaporn Yuksen, Chetsadakon Jenpanitpong, Suteenun Seesuklom
{"title":"Predicting the Need for Tertiary Trauma Care Using a Multivariable Model: A 4-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Piraya Vichiensanth, Kantawat Leepayakhun, Chaiyaporn Yuksen, Chetsadakon Jenpanitpong, Suteenun Seesuklom","doi":"10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delays in accessing an appropriate level of care can lead to significant morbidity or even mortality of trauma patients. This study aimed to develop a simplified prehospital predictive model to determine the need for tertiary care trauma centers (TTC), enabling timely and appropriate transport decisions by emergency medical service (EMS) teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at the emergency department (ED) of Ramathibodi Hospital between January 2020 and April 2024. Prehospital trauma patients aged ≥15 years who were transported by EMS were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups with and without the need for TTC, and the independent predictive factors of the need for TTC were explored using multivariable regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 440 trauma patients, with 31.1% requiring TTC. The predictors of the need for TTC included age (coefficient (Coef.) -0.003; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.018 to 0.012; P=0.693), traffic mechanism (Coef. 0.848; 95%CI: 0.150 to 1.546; P=0.017), respiratory rate (Coef. 0.044; 95%CI: -0.037 to 1.124; P=0.285), heart rate (Coef. -0.004; 95%CI: -0.020 to 0.012; P=0.610), and Glasgow Coma Scale (Coef. -0.312; 95%CI: -0.451 to -0.173; P<0.001). The predictive model categorized patients into low, moderate, and high-risk groups. Patients who were categorized in the high-risk group showed a positive likelihood ratio (LHR+) of 14.88 for requiring TTC. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) of 73%, indicating the good discriminative ability of this prediction model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The predictive model classifies trauma patients into three risk groups based on five prognostic variables, which are able to predict the likelihood of requiring TTC. Internal validation has verified its high level of accuracy in trauma triage.</p>","PeriodicalId":8146,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"e37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Delays in accessing an appropriate level of care can lead to significant morbidity or even mortality of trauma patients. This study aimed to develop a simplified prehospital predictive model to determine the need for tertiary care trauma centers (TTC), enabling timely and appropriate transport decisions by emergency medical service (EMS) teams.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at the emergency department (ED) of Ramathibodi Hospital between January 2020 and April 2024. Prehospital trauma patients aged ≥15 years who were transported by EMS were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups with and without the need for TTC, and the independent predictive factors of the need for TTC were explored using multivariable regression analysis.

Results: The study included 440 trauma patients, with 31.1% requiring TTC. The predictors of the need for TTC included age (coefficient (Coef.) -0.003; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.018 to 0.012; P=0.693), traffic mechanism (Coef. 0.848; 95%CI: 0.150 to 1.546; P=0.017), respiratory rate (Coef. 0.044; 95%CI: -0.037 to 1.124; P=0.285), heart rate (Coef. -0.004; 95%CI: -0.020 to 0.012; P=0.610), and Glasgow Coma Scale (Coef. -0.312; 95%CI: -0.451 to -0.173; P<0.001). The predictive model categorized patients into low, moderate, and high-risk groups. Patients who were categorized in the high-risk group showed a positive likelihood ratio (LHR+) of 14.88 for requiring TTC. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) of 73%, indicating the good discriminative ability of this prediction model.

Conclusions: The predictive model classifies trauma patients into three risk groups based on five prognostic variables, which are able to predict the likelihood of requiring TTC. Internal validation has verified its high level of accuracy in trauma triage.

使用多变量模型预测三级创伤护理需求:一项4年回顾性队列研究。
在获得适当水平的护理方面的延误可能导致创伤患者的显著发病率甚至死亡率。本研究旨在建立一个简化的院前预测模型,以确定三级护理创伤中心(TTC)的需求,使紧急医疗服务(EMS)团队能够及时和适当地做出运输决策。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,于2020年1月至2024年4月在Ramathibodi医院急诊科(ED)进行。年龄≥15岁经EMS转运的院前创伤患者纳入研究。将患者分为有TTC需要和无TTC需要两组,采用多变量回归分析探讨TTC需要的独立预测因素。结果:本研究纳入440例创伤患者,31.1%需要TTC。TTC需求的预测因子包括年龄(系数(Coef.) -0.003;95%置信区间(CI): -0.018 ~ 0.012;P=0.693),交通机制(Coef. 0.848;95%CI: 0.150 ~ 1.546;P=0.017)、呼吸频率(Coef. 0.044;95%CI: -0.037 ~ 1.124;P=0.285),心率(Coef。-0.004;95%CI: -0.020 ~ 0.012;P=0.610),格拉斯哥昏迷量表(Coef。-0.312;95%CI: -0.451 ~ -0.173;结论:该预测模型基于5个预后变量将创伤患者分为3个风险组,能够预测需要TTC的可能性。内部验证证实了其在创伤分诊中的高水平准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信