Daire Ó hUallacháin, Per-Erik Mellander, Nikki Baggaley, Allan Lilly, Mark Wilkinson, Marc Stutter
{"title":"Effectiveness of Riparian Mitigation Measures for Enhancing Ecosystem Functions: A Holistic Summary of Selected Measures","authors":"Daire Ó hUallacháin, Per-Erik Mellander, Nikki Baggaley, Allan Lilly, Mark Wilkinson, Marc Stutter","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02165-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Water quality has declined globally over recent decades. The riparian interface is a key location for mitigation measures to support water quality and wider ecosystem services (ES). With new, multi-functional, riparian mitigation measures being designed and implemented, there is a need for evidence on the functioning of such measures with respect to delivery of ES. This study incorporated the judgements’ of experts, to assess the effectiveness of various riparian measures to deliver 14 individual ES. In total 24 experts (covering a range of expertise and nationalities) completed a bespoke questionnaire (and follow-up workshop) to assess their opinion on the effectiveness of 16 mitigation measures (e.g. grass buffers, wooded buffers, integrated buffers, sediment fence) to deliver the identified ES (e.g. water quality, habitats, carbon, recreation). The results highlight the significant variance in effectiveness of the 16 mitigation measures across the 14 individual ES. Wooded buffers were the most effective mitigation measure for seven of the fourteen individual ES and in most cases were deemed highly effective at delivering that service. Linear grass buffer strips consistently scored amongst the least effective measures. The results indicate that riparian mitigation measures are consistently less effective at delivering ES relating to pesticides and biomass production than they are for other ES. This study highlights that there is no ideal riparian mitigation measure capable of delivering the wide range of ES. Future policy/research could focus on developing and implementing bundles of mitigation measures along the source-pathway receptor continuum, by means of a “treatment train” approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":"75 6","pages":"1444 - 1459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-025-02165-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Water quality has declined globally over recent decades. The riparian interface is a key location for mitigation measures to support water quality and wider ecosystem services (ES). With new, multi-functional, riparian mitigation measures being designed and implemented, there is a need for evidence on the functioning of such measures with respect to delivery of ES. This study incorporated the judgements’ of experts, to assess the effectiveness of various riparian measures to deliver 14 individual ES. In total 24 experts (covering a range of expertise and nationalities) completed a bespoke questionnaire (and follow-up workshop) to assess their opinion on the effectiveness of 16 mitigation measures (e.g. grass buffers, wooded buffers, integrated buffers, sediment fence) to deliver the identified ES (e.g. water quality, habitats, carbon, recreation). The results highlight the significant variance in effectiveness of the 16 mitigation measures across the 14 individual ES. Wooded buffers were the most effective mitigation measure for seven of the fourteen individual ES and in most cases were deemed highly effective at delivering that service. Linear grass buffer strips consistently scored amongst the least effective measures. The results indicate that riparian mitigation measures are consistently less effective at delivering ES relating to pesticides and biomass production than they are for other ES. This study highlights that there is no ideal riparian mitigation measure capable of delivering the wide range of ES. Future policy/research could focus on developing and implementing bundles of mitigation measures along the source-pathway receptor continuum, by means of a “treatment train” approach.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more.
As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.