Effectiveness of Riparian Mitigation Measures for Enhancing Ecosystem Functions: A Holistic Summary of Selected Measures

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Daire Ó hUallacháin, Per-Erik Mellander, Nikki Baggaley, Allan Lilly, Mark Wilkinson, Marc Stutter
{"title":"Effectiveness of Riparian Mitigation Measures for Enhancing Ecosystem Functions: A Holistic Summary of Selected Measures","authors":"Daire Ó hUallacháin,&nbsp;Per-Erik Mellander,&nbsp;Nikki Baggaley,&nbsp;Allan Lilly,&nbsp;Mark Wilkinson,&nbsp;Marc Stutter","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02165-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Water quality has declined globally over recent decades. The riparian interface is a key location for mitigation measures to support water quality and wider ecosystem services (ES). With new, multi-functional, riparian mitigation measures being designed and implemented, there is a need for evidence on the functioning of such measures with respect to delivery of ES. This study incorporated the judgements’ of experts, to assess the effectiveness of various riparian measures to deliver 14 individual ES. In total 24 experts (covering a range of expertise and nationalities) completed a bespoke questionnaire (and follow-up workshop) to assess their opinion on the effectiveness of 16 mitigation measures (e.g. grass buffers, wooded buffers, integrated buffers, sediment fence) to deliver the identified ES (e.g. water quality, habitats, carbon, recreation). The results highlight the significant variance in effectiveness of the 16 mitigation measures across the 14 individual ES. Wooded buffers were the most effective mitigation measure for seven of the fourteen individual ES and in most cases were deemed highly effective at delivering that service. Linear grass buffer strips consistently scored amongst the least effective measures. The results indicate that riparian mitigation measures are consistently less effective at delivering ES relating to pesticides and biomass production than they are for other ES. This study highlights that there is no ideal riparian mitigation measure capable of delivering the wide range of ES. Future policy/research could focus on developing and implementing bundles of mitigation measures along the source-pathway receptor continuum, by means of a “treatment train” approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":"75 6","pages":"1444 - 1459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-025-02165-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water quality has declined globally over recent decades. The riparian interface is a key location for mitigation measures to support water quality and wider ecosystem services (ES). With new, multi-functional, riparian mitigation measures being designed and implemented, there is a need for evidence on the functioning of such measures with respect to delivery of ES. This study incorporated the judgements’ of experts, to assess the effectiveness of various riparian measures to deliver 14 individual ES. In total 24 experts (covering a range of expertise and nationalities) completed a bespoke questionnaire (and follow-up workshop) to assess their opinion on the effectiveness of 16 mitigation measures (e.g. grass buffers, wooded buffers, integrated buffers, sediment fence) to deliver the identified ES (e.g. water quality, habitats, carbon, recreation). The results highlight the significant variance in effectiveness of the 16 mitigation measures across the 14 individual ES. Wooded buffers were the most effective mitigation measure for seven of the fourteen individual ES and in most cases were deemed highly effective at delivering that service. Linear grass buffer strips consistently scored amongst the least effective measures. The results indicate that riparian mitigation measures are consistently less effective at delivering ES relating to pesticides and biomass production than they are for other ES. This study highlights that there is no ideal riparian mitigation measure capable of delivering the wide range of ES. Future policy/research could focus on developing and implementing bundles of mitigation measures along the source-pathway receptor continuum, by means of a “treatment train” approach.

河岸缓解措施对增强生态系统功能的有效性:所选措施的整体总结。
近几十年来,全球水质有所下降。河岸界面是缓解措施的关键位置,以支持水质和更广泛的生态系统服务(ES)。随着正在设计和实施新的多功能河岸缓解措施,需要有证据证明这些措施在提供无害环境方面的作用。本研究结合了专家的判断,以评估各种河岸措施的有效性,以提供14个个体的ES。共有24名专家(涵盖一系列专业知识和国籍)完成了一份定制问卷(和后续讲习班),以评估他们对16项缓解措施(如草地缓冲、树木缓冲、综合缓冲、沉积物围栏)的有效性的意见,以提供确定的生态环境(如水质、栖息地、碳、娱乐)。结果突出了14个个体ES中16种缓解措施有效性的显着差异。对于14个生态系统个体中的7个来说,树木缓冲是最有效的缓解措施,在大多数情况下被认为在提供这项服务方面非常有效。线性草地缓冲带一直是最不有效的措施之一。结果表明,在提供与农药和生物量生产有关的生态系统方面,河岸缓解措施始终不如其他生态系统有效。这项研究强调,没有理想的河岸缓解措施能够提供大范围的ES。未来的政策/研究可侧重于通过“治疗列车”方法,沿着源-途径受体连续体制定和实施一系列缓解措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信