Comparison of thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and immune responses to different passive heat therapy modalities.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Jessica K Atencio, Emma L Reed, Karen Wiedenfeld Needham, Kathryn M Lucernoni, Lindan N Comrada, John R Halliwill, Christopher T Minson
{"title":"Comparison of thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and immune responses to different passive heat therapy modalities.","authors":"Jessica K Atencio, Emma L Reed, Karen Wiedenfeld Needham, Kathryn M Lucernoni, Lindan N Comrada, John R Halliwill, Christopher T Minson","doi":"10.1152/ajpregu.00012.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and immune responses to acute hot water immersion (HWI), traditional sauna (TRAD), and far infrared sauna (FIR). Twenty healthy adults (10 F; age 24 ± 4 yr) completed three bouts of passive heating: HWI (45 min at 40.5°C), TRAD (3 × 10 min at 80°C), and FIR (45 min at 45-65°C) separated by at least 1 wk. Core temperature (T<sub>c</sub>) was measured at baseline and every 5-min during heating. Cardiac output (Q<sub>c</sub>) was measured before, halfway, and at the end of heating using the open-circuit acetylene wash-in method. Venous blood was collected at baseline and ∼20-min, 24-, and 48-h postheating for measurement of inflammatory cytokines and immune cell populations. The overall change in T<sub>c</sub> from baseline to end of heating was greater in HWI [+1.1°C (0.9, 1.3)] vs. TRAD [+0.4°C (0.2, 0.6), <i>P</i> < 0.01], HWI vs. FIR [+0.0°C (-0.1, 0.2), <i>P</i> < 0.01], and TRAD vs. FIR (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Q<sub>c</sub> increased to the greatest extent in HWI [+3.7 L/min (2.9, 4.4)] vs. TRAD [+2.3 L/min (1.8, 2.8), <i>P</i> < 0.01] and HWI vs. FIR [+1.6 L/min (1.2, 2.1), <i>P</i> < 0.01], with no difference between TRAD vs. FIR (<i>P</i> = 0.06). HWI was the only heating modality to elicit inflammatory and immune responses as evidenced by increased interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentration postheating [+0.386 pg/mL (0.093, 0.680), <i>P</i> = 0.04], NK cells 24-h postheating (<i>P</i> = 0.03), and CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells at 24 (<i>P</i> = 0.02) and 48 h postheating (<i>P</i> = 0.03). A single bout of hot water immersion elicits the greatest thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and immune responses compared with both sauna modalities.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Our goal was to compare three widely utilized modalities of passive heating in the manner that they are most commonly used for heat therapy. We have demonstrated that hot water immersion leads to the greatest thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and immune responses compared with both traditional and far infrared saunas in young, healthy adults. Far infrared sauna heating was the least impactful on raising body core temperature and the resulting cardiovascular and immune responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":7630,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","volume":" ","pages":"R20-R35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00012.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and immune responses to acute hot water immersion (HWI), traditional sauna (TRAD), and far infrared sauna (FIR). Twenty healthy adults (10 F; age 24 ± 4 yr) completed three bouts of passive heating: HWI (45 min at 40.5°C), TRAD (3 × 10 min at 80°C), and FIR (45 min at 45-65°C) separated by at least 1 wk. Core temperature (Tc) was measured at baseline and every 5-min during heating. Cardiac output (Qc) was measured before, halfway, and at the end of heating using the open-circuit acetylene wash-in method. Venous blood was collected at baseline and ∼20-min, 24-, and 48-h postheating for measurement of inflammatory cytokines and immune cell populations. The overall change in Tc from baseline to end of heating was greater in HWI [+1.1°C (0.9, 1.3)] vs. TRAD [+0.4°C (0.2, 0.6), P < 0.01], HWI vs. FIR [+0.0°C (-0.1, 0.2), P < 0.01], and TRAD vs. FIR (P = 0.02). Qc increased to the greatest extent in HWI [+3.7 L/min (2.9, 4.4)] vs. TRAD [+2.3 L/min (1.8, 2.8), P < 0.01] and HWI vs. FIR [+1.6 L/min (1.2, 2.1), P < 0.01], with no difference between TRAD vs. FIR (P = 0.06). HWI was the only heating modality to elicit inflammatory and immune responses as evidenced by increased interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentration postheating [+0.386 pg/mL (0.093, 0.680), P = 0.04], NK cells 24-h postheating (P = 0.03), and CD8+ T cells at 24 (P = 0.02) and 48 h postheating (P = 0.03). A single bout of hot water immersion elicits the greatest thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and immune responses compared with both sauna modalities.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our goal was to compare three widely utilized modalities of passive heating in the manner that they are most commonly used for heat therapy. We have demonstrated that hot water immersion leads to the greatest thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and immune responses compared with both traditional and far infrared saunas in young, healthy adults. Far infrared sauna heating was the least impactful on raising body core temperature and the resulting cardiovascular and immune responses.

不同被动热疗方式对体温调节、心血管和免疫反应的比较。
本研究比较了急性热水浸泡(HWI)、传统桑拿(TRAD)和远红外桑拿(FIR)的体温调节、心血管和免疫反应。20名健康成人(10岁;年龄24±4岁)完成三次被动加热:HWI(40°C 45 min), TRAD(80°C 3 × 10 min)和FIR(45 -65°C 45 min),间隔至少1周。在基线和加热过程中每5分钟测量一次核心温度(Tc)。采用开路乙炔冲洗法测定加热前、加热中、加热结束时的心输出量(Q)。在基线和加热后~20分钟、24小时和48小时采集静脉血,测量炎症细胞因子和免疫细胞群。从基线到加热结束的总Tc变化在HWI组[+1.1°C(0.9, 1.3)]比TRAD组[+0.4°C(0.2, 0.6)]更大
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
145
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology publishes original investigations that illuminate normal or abnormal regulation and integration of physiological mechanisms at all levels of biological organization, ranging from molecules to humans, including clinical investigations. Major areas of emphasis include regulation in genetically modified animals; model organisms; development and tissue plasticity; neurohumoral control of circulation and hypertension; local control of circulation; cardiac and renal integration; thirst and volume, electrolyte homeostasis; glucose homeostasis and energy balance; appetite and obesity; inflammation and cytokines; integrative physiology of pregnancy-parturition-lactation; and thermoregulation and adaptations to exercise and environmental stress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信