MRI radiomics prediction modelling for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jason Rai, Dinh V C Mai, Ioanna Drami, Edward T Pring, Laura E Gould, Phillip F C Lung, Thomas Glover, Joshua D Shur, Brandon Whitcher, Thanos Athanasiou, John T Jenkins
{"title":"MRI radiomics prediction modelling for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jason Rai, Dinh V C Mai, Ioanna Drami, Edward T Pring, Laura E Gould, Phillip F C Lung, Thomas Glover, Joshua D Shur, Brandon Whitcher, Thanos Athanasiou, John T Jenkins","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04953-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is challenging. Organ preservation strategies can be offered to patients with complete clinical response. We aim to evaluate MRI-derived radiomics models in predicting complete pathological response (pCR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search included MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) for studies published before 1st February 2024. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) tools were used to assess quality of included study. The research protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024512865). We calculated pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) using a random-effects model. To compare AUC between subgroups the Hanley & McNeil test was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four eligible studies (12,714 patients) were identified for inclusion in the systematic review. We selected thirty-five studies including 10,543 patients for meta-analysis. The pooled AUC for MRI radiomics predicted pCR in LARC was 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.89). In the subgroup analysis 3 T MRI field intensity had higher pooled AUC 0.9 (95% CI 0.87-0.94) than 1.5 T pooled AUC 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.83) p < 0.001. Asian ethnicity had higher pooled AUC 0.9 (95% CI 0.87-0.93) than non-Asian pooled AUC 0.8 (95% CI 0.75-0.84) p < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have demonstrated that 3 T MRI field intensity provides a superior predictive performance. The role of ethnicity on radiomics features needs to be explored in future studies. Further research in the field of MRI radiomics is important as accurate prediction for pCR can lead to organ preservation strategy in LARC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04953-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is challenging. Organ preservation strategies can be offered to patients with complete clinical response. We aim to evaluate MRI-derived radiomics models in predicting complete pathological response (pCR).

Methods: Search included MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) for studies published before 1st February 2024. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) tools were used to assess quality of included study. The research protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024512865). We calculated pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) using a random-effects model. To compare AUC between subgroups the Hanley & McNeil test was performed.

Results: Forty-four eligible studies (12,714 patients) were identified for inclusion in the systematic review. We selected thirty-five studies including 10,543 patients for meta-analysis. The pooled AUC for MRI radiomics predicted pCR in LARC was 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.89). In the subgroup analysis 3 T MRI field intensity had higher pooled AUC 0.9 (95% CI 0.87-0.94) than 1.5 T pooled AUC 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.83) p < 0.001. Asian ethnicity had higher pooled AUC 0.9 (95% CI 0.87-0.93) than non-Asian pooled AUC 0.8 (95% CI 0.75-0.84) p < 0.001.

Conclusion: We have demonstrated that 3 T MRI field intensity provides a superior predictive performance. The role of ethnicity on radiomics features needs to be explored in future studies. Further research in the field of MRI radiomics is important as accurate prediction for pCR can lead to organ preservation strategy in LARC.

局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗病理完全缓解的MRI放射组学预测模型:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:预测局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)对新辅助治疗的反应具有挑战性。为临床反应完全的患者提供器官保存策略。我们的目的是评估mri衍生的放射组学模型在预测完全病理反应(pCR)方面的作用。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)和Cochrane系统评价数据库(CDSR),检索2024年2月1日前发表的研究。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2 (QUADAS-2)和放射组学质量评分(RQS)工具评估纳入研究的质量。研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024512865)。我们使用随机效应模型计算了受者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的合池面积。为了比较各组间的AUC,采用Hanley & McNeil检验。结果:44项符合条件的研究(12,714例患者)被纳入系统评价。我们选择了35项研究,包括10,543例患者进行meta分析。MRI放射组学预测LARC pCR的合并AUC为0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.89)。在亚组分析中,3t MRI场强度的合并AUC为0.9 (95% CI 0.87-0.94),高于1.5 T合并AUC 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.83)。结论:我们已经证明3t MRI场强度提供了优越的预测性能。种族对放射组学特征的作用需要在未来的研究中探索。MRI放射组学领域的进一步研究是重要的,因为准确预测pCR可以指导LARC的器官保存策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信