Unraveling Fish Community Diversity and Structure in the Yellow Sea: Evidence from Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and Bottom Trawling.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animals Pub Date : 2025-04-30 DOI:10.3390/ani15091283
Jinyong Zhang, Xiaoyu Cui, Lin Lin, Yuan Liu, Jinqing Ye, Weiyue Zhang, Hongjun Li
{"title":"Unraveling Fish Community Diversity and Structure in the Yellow Sea: Evidence from Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and Bottom Trawling.","authors":"Jinyong Zhang, Xiaoyu Cui, Lin Lin, Yuan Liu, Jinqing Ye, Weiyue Zhang, Hongjun Li","doi":"10.3390/ani15091283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to analyze fish species diversity across different aquatic ecosystems is well documented. Nonetheless, there is a gap in validating eDNA metabarcoding studies on the diversity and structure of fish communities in coastal ecosystems, particularly in comparing these findings with bottom trawl catch data. In this study, we employed eDNA metabarcoding to explore species composition and relative abundance in fish communities, taxonomic-level diversity variations, and the interplay between community structures and environmental factors in the Yellow Sea and compared these results with those obtained from bottom trawl catches. In addition, we compared the various methods used to estimate the distributions of taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity factors. We found that eDNA metabarcoding detected a greater number of species (86 vs. 41), genera (73 vs. 37), and families (42 vs. 25) than bottom trawl results at each sampling station. eDNA metabarcoding provided higher Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1 alpha diversity indices than the bottom trawl results. The PCoA results showed that eDNA metabarcoding samples could be more clearly separated at the sampling sites in the Zhuanghe (ZH) and Lianyungang (LYG) areas than bottom trawling samples. The RDA analysis indicated that temperature, along with NO3- and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentrations, were pivotal in shaping the geographical patterns of fish communities, as identified through eDNA metabarcoding, echoing findings from bottom trawling studies. Furthermore, our findings suggest that eDNA barcoding surpasses bottom trawling in detecting taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity, as well as in uncovering greater functional diversity at the local level. Conclusively, eDNA metabarcoding emerges as a valuable complement to bottom trawling, offering a multifaceted approach to biodiversity monitoring that not only boosts efficiency but also reduces environmental impact on coastal ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15091283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding to analyze fish species diversity across different aquatic ecosystems is well documented. Nonetheless, there is a gap in validating eDNA metabarcoding studies on the diversity and structure of fish communities in coastal ecosystems, particularly in comparing these findings with bottom trawl catch data. In this study, we employed eDNA metabarcoding to explore species composition and relative abundance in fish communities, taxonomic-level diversity variations, and the interplay between community structures and environmental factors in the Yellow Sea and compared these results with those obtained from bottom trawl catches. In addition, we compared the various methods used to estimate the distributions of taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity factors. We found that eDNA metabarcoding detected a greater number of species (86 vs. 41), genera (73 vs. 37), and families (42 vs. 25) than bottom trawl results at each sampling station. eDNA metabarcoding provided higher Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1 alpha diversity indices than the bottom trawl results. The PCoA results showed that eDNA metabarcoding samples could be more clearly separated at the sampling sites in the Zhuanghe (ZH) and Lianyungang (LYG) areas than bottom trawling samples. The RDA analysis indicated that temperature, along with NO3- and NH4+ concentrations, were pivotal in shaping the geographical patterns of fish communities, as identified through eDNA metabarcoding, echoing findings from bottom trawling studies. Furthermore, our findings suggest that eDNA barcoding surpasses bottom trawling in detecting taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity, as well as in uncovering greater functional diversity at the local level. Conclusively, eDNA metabarcoding emerges as a valuable complement to bottom trawling, offering a multifaceted approach to biodiversity monitoring that not only boosts efficiency but also reduces environmental impact on coastal ecosystems.

揭示黄海鱼类群落多样性和结构:来自环境DNA元条形码和底拖网捕捞的证据。
利用环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码分析不同水生生态系统中的鱼类物种多样性已有充分的文献记录。尽管如此,在验证关于沿海生态系统鱼类群落多样性和结构的eDNA元条形码研究方面仍存在差距,特别是在将这些发现与底拖网捕捞数据进行比较方面。本研究采用eDNA元条形码技术对黄海鱼类群落的物种组成、相对丰度、分类水平的多样性变化以及群落结构与环境因子的相互作用进行了研究,并与底拖网捕捞结果进行了比较。此外,我们比较了用于估计分类、系统发育和功能多样性因子分布的各种方法。我们发现,eDNA元条形码在每个采样站检测到的物种(86比41)、属(73比37)和科(42比25)的数量都高于底部拖网的结果。eDNA元条形码提供了比底拖网结果更高的Shannon、Simpson和Chao1 α多样性指数。PCoA结果表明,在庄河(ZH)和连云港(LYG)地区取样点,eDNA元条形码样品比底拖网取样点能更清晰地分离。RDA分析表明,温度以及NO3-和NH4+浓度是塑造鱼类群落地理格局的关键,通过eDNA元条形码识别,这与底部拖网研究的结果相呼应。此外,我们的研究结果表明,eDNA条形码在检测分类和系统发育多样性以及在局部水平上发现更大的功能多样性方面优于海底拖网捕捞。最后,eDNA元条形码作为海底拖网捕捞的一种有价值的补充,提供了一种多方面的生物多样性监测方法,不仅提高了效率,而且减少了对沿海生态系统的环境影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animals
Animals Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍: Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信