Monoclonal antibodies against beta-amyloid protein (lecanemab and donanemab) should not be used in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1808082
Ricardo Nitrini, Adalberto Studart-Neto
{"title":"Monoclonal antibodies against beta-amyloid protein (lecanemab and donanemab) should not be used in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Ricardo Nitrini, Adalberto Studart-Neto","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1808082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two antiamyloid monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), lecanemab and donanemab, were recently launched for treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). These mAbs remove amyloid protein from the brain and cause statistically significant improvement in cognitive/functional tests, meaning a change in evolution of AD. This is important to reinforce the amyloid cascade hypothesis and to further concentrate studies on the pathways from the deposition of the beta-amyloid protein to synaptic loss and neuronal death. However, it is necessary to evaluate whether the results are clinically important. Analysis of the clinical trials showed that the statistically significant differences over placebo did not reach the minimum clinically important difference that would be meaningful for patients, caregivers and clinicians. Besides, the incidence of adverse events is high and potentially severe. Although there are reasons to celebrate this first step towards disease-modifying therapies for AD, lecanemab and donanemab should not be used to treat AD in clinical pratice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8694,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","volume":"83 5","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1808082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two antiamyloid monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), lecanemab and donanemab, were recently launched for treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). These mAbs remove amyloid protein from the brain and cause statistically significant improvement in cognitive/functional tests, meaning a change in evolution of AD. This is important to reinforce the amyloid cascade hypothesis and to further concentrate studies on the pathways from the deposition of the beta-amyloid protein to synaptic loss and neuronal death. However, it is necessary to evaluate whether the results are clinically important. Analysis of the clinical trials showed that the statistically significant differences over placebo did not reach the minimum clinically important difference that would be meaningful for patients, caregivers and clinicians. Besides, the incidence of adverse events is high and potentially severe. Although there are reasons to celebrate this first step towards disease-modifying therapies for AD, lecanemab and donanemab should not be used to treat AD in clinical pratice.

抗β -淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体(lecanemab和donanemab)不应用于治疗阿尔茨海默病。
两种抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体(mab) lecanemab和donanemab最近推出用于治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)。这些单克隆抗体从大脑中去除淀粉样蛋白,并在认知/功能测试中引起统计学上显著的改善,这意味着AD的进化发生了变化。这对于加强淀粉样蛋白级联假说和进一步集中研究β -淀粉样蛋白沉积到突触丧失和神经元死亡的途径是很重要的。然而,有必要评估结果是否具有临床重要性。对临床试验的分析表明,与安慰剂相比,具有统计学意义的差异没有达到对患者、护理人员和临床医生有意义的最小临床重要差异。此外,不良事件的发生率很高,可能很严重。尽管我们有理由庆祝这一向着阿尔茨海默病改善疗法迈出的第一步,但在临床实践中,lecanemab和donanemab不应用于治疗阿尔茨海默病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
262
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the official journal of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The mission of the journal is to provide neurologists, specialists and researchers in Neurology and related fields with open access to original articles (clinical and translational research), editorials, reviews, historical papers, neuroimages and letters about published manuscripts. It also publishes the consensus and guidelines on Neurology, as well as educational and scientific material from the different scientific departments of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The ultimate goals of the journal are to contribute to advance knowledge in the areas of Neurology and Neuroscience, and to provide valuable material for training and continuing education for neurologists and other health professionals working in the area. These goals might contribute to improving care for patients with neurological diseases. We aim to be the best Neuroscience journal in Latin America within the peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信