{"title":"Ecological Affordances across Life Stages: An Affordance Management Framework.","authors":"Ahra Ko, Steven L Neuberg","doi":"10.1017/S0140525X25000056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the interaction between humans and their environments is central to psychological science, its dynamics throughout the lifespan remain unexplored. We consider how <i>ecological affordances</i>-the opportunities and threats an environment poses for one's goal achievement-can be differently perceived across developmental life stages. Integrating affordance-management and life-history perspectives, we propose that individuals perceive and respond to ecological affordances based on their prioritized goals, which shift systematically as they progress through life stages. The same environment can be perceived as posing an opportunity at one life stage, but as posing a threat or being irrelevant at other stages with different goal priorities. To illustrate the value of this framework, we focus on three environmental dimensions tied to recurring adaptive challenges in human history: genetic relatedness, physical violence, and sex-age ratio. We examine how individuals perceive and navigate ecological affordances across three key life stages-childhood, mating, and parenting-through multiple strategies: (a) recalibrating cognitive and affective attunement to relevant cues, (b) adjusting psychological and behavioral strategies, and (c) reconstructing their environments at various levels. By bridging social, developmental, and cognitive psychology with behavioral ecology and evolutionary biology, this framework advances our understanding of human-environment interactions by (a) challenging the assumption that environmental effects are static, (b) generating precise hypotheses about psychological and behavioral patterns, enabling systematic and holistic investigation, and (c) underscoring the potential for lifelong flexibility in ecological navigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8698,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-74"},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X25000056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although the interaction between humans and their environments is central to psychological science, its dynamics throughout the lifespan remain unexplored. We consider how ecological affordances-the opportunities and threats an environment poses for one's goal achievement-can be differently perceived across developmental life stages. Integrating affordance-management and life-history perspectives, we propose that individuals perceive and respond to ecological affordances based on their prioritized goals, which shift systematically as they progress through life stages. The same environment can be perceived as posing an opportunity at one life stage, but as posing a threat or being irrelevant at other stages with different goal priorities. To illustrate the value of this framework, we focus on three environmental dimensions tied to recurring adaptive challenges in human history: genetic relatedness, physical violence, and sex-age ratio. We examine how individuals perceive and navigate ecological affordances across three key life stages-childhood, mating, and parenting-through multiple strategies: (a) recalibrating cognitive and affective attunement to relevant cues, (b) adjusting psychological and behavioral strategies, and (c) reconstructing their environments at various levels. By bridging social, developmental, and cognitive psychology with behavioral ecology and evolutionary biology, this framework advances our understanding of human-environment interactions by (a) challenging the assumption that environmental effects are static, (b) generating precise hypotheses about psychological and behavioral patterns, enabling systematic and holistic investigation, and (c) underscoring the potential for lifelong flexibility in ecological navigation.
期刊介绍:
Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.