Adherence and persistence among patients with hereditary angioedema receiving long-term prophylaxis in the United States.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Allergy and asthma proceedings Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.2500/aap.2025.46.250029
Bruce L Zuraw, Lorena Lopez-Gonzalez, Janna Manjelievskaia, Isabelle Winer, Alex Dean, Stephanie Wall, James Nelson, Sandra Nestler-Parr, Patrick Gillard, Sandra C Christiansen
{"title":"Adherence and persistence among patients with hereditary angioedema receiving long-term prophylaxis in the United States.","authors":"Bruce L Zuraw, Lorena Lopez-Gonzalez, Janna Manjelievskaia, Isabelle Winer, Alex Dean, Stephanie Wall, James Nelson, Sandra Nestler-Parr, Patrick Gillard, Sandra C Christiansen","doi":"10.2500/aap.2025.46.250029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Real-world evidence that compares the treatment patterns of targeted long-term prophylaxis (LTP) for hereditary angioedema (HAE), including berotralstat, lanadelumab, and subcutaneous (SC) plasma-derived C1 inhibitor (pdC1-INH) is limited. <b>Objective:</b> The study aimed to assess adherence and persistence after initiation of berotralstat, lanadelumab, or SC-pdC1-INH. <b>Methods:</b> Electronic health records linked to claims data was used to select patients ages ≥ 12 years, initiating one of three LTPs between June 22, 2017, and September 12, 2023, with mutually exclusive cohorts assigned hierarchically in reverse order of their U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval date. Patients were required to have ≥ 12 months of continuous enrollment before and after the LTP initiation date. Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics were captured. Primary study measures were adherence, defined as the mean proportion of days covered (PDC), and persistence, defined as having no gap in treatment ≥ 45 days after the LTP initiation date. A subgroup analysis was conducted among patients with two or more claims for their index LTP. A sensitivity analysis was performed by reassigning cohorts based on the first claim for qualifying LTP after June 22, 2017. <b>Results:</b> The main analysis included 357 patients (90 on berotralstat, 189 lanadelumab, and 78 SC-pdC1-INH). Overall, 46% to 51% of the patients had LTP experience. Adherence (mean PDC) was similar between treatments at 0.73, 0.78, and 0.74 for berotralstat, lanadelumab, and SC-pdC1-INH, respectively. Proportions of patients persistent on index LTP after 12 months were similar across LTPs: 61%, 58%, and 53% for berotralstat, lanadelumab, and SC-pdC1-INH, respectively. The findings of the subgroup and sensitivity analyses supported the main analysis. <b>Conclusion:</b> Adherence and persistence rates for all three LTP treatments were uniformly high. Berotralstat adherence and persistence were comparable with those observed after lanadelumab or SC-pdC1-INH initiation in the main analysis, among patients with two or more claims for their index LTP, and among cohorts assigned based on the first claim for qualifying LTP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7646,"journal":{"name":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","volume":" ","pages":"209-217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy and asthma proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2025.46.250029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Real-world evidence that compares the treatment patterns of targeted long-term prophylaxis (LTP) for hereditary angioedema (HAE), including berotralstat, lanadelumab, and subcutaneous (SC) plasma-derived C1 inhibitor (pdC1-INH) is limited. Objective: The study aimed to assess adherence and persistence after initiation of berotralstat, lanadelumab, or SC-pdC1-INH. Methods: Electronic health records linked to claims data was used to select patients ages ≥ 12 years, initiating one of three LTPs between June 22, 2017, and September 12, 2023, with mutually exclusive cohorts assigned hierarchically in reverse order of their U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval date. Patients were required to have ≥ 12 months of continuous enrollment before and after the LTP initiation date. Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics were captured. Primary study measures were adherence, defined as the mean proportion of days covered (PDC), and persistence, defined as having no gap in treatment ≥ 45 days after the LTP initiation date. A subgroup analysis was conducted among patients with two or more claims for their index LTP. A sensitivity analysis was performed by reassigning cohorts based on the first claim for qualifying LTP after June 22, 2017. Results: The main analysis included 357 patients (90 on berotralstat, 189 lanadelumab, and 78 SC-pdC1-INH). Overall, 46% to 51% of the patients had LTP experience. Adherence (mean PDC) was similar between treatments at 0.73, 0.78, and 0.74 for berotralstat, lanadelumab, and SC-pdC1-INH, respectively. Proportions of patients persistent on index LTP after 12 months were similar across LTPs: 61%, 58%, and 53% for berotralstat, lanadelumab, and SC-pdC1-INH, respectively. The findings of the subgroup and sensitivity analyses supported the main analysis. Conclusion: Adherence and persistence rates for all three LTP treatments were uniformly high. Berotralstat adherence and persistence were comparable with those observed after lanadelumab or SC-pdC1-INH initiation in the main analysis, among patients with two or more claims for their index LTP, and among cohorts assigned based on the first claim for qualifying LTP.

在美国接受长期预防治疗的遗传性血管性水肿患者的依从性和持久性
现实世界的证据比较靶向长期预防(LTP)治疗遗传性阳水肿(HAE)的治疗模式,包括贝曲司他、lanadelumab和皮下(SC)血浆源性C1抑制剂(pdC1- INH)是有限的。目的:该研究旨在评估贝曲司他、lanadelumab或SC-pdC1-INH开始后的依从性和持久性。方法:使用与索赔数据相关的电子健康记录来选择年龄大于或等于12岁的患者,在2017年6月22日至2023年9月12日期间启动三个ltp中的一个,并按照美国食品和药物管理局批准日期的相反顺序排列互斥队列。患者被要求在LTP开始日期之前或之后有大于或等于12个月的连续入组。收集了人口统计学和基线临床特征。研究的主要指标是依从性,定义为平均覆盖天数比例(PDC),以及持续性,定义为在LTP开始日期后没有超过或等于45天的治疗间隔。亚组分析是在对他们的指数LTP有两个或更多要求的患者中进行的。根据2017年6月22日之后首次申请合格LTP的患者重新分配队列,进行敏感性分析。结果:主要分析包括357例患者(90例使用贝曲司他,189例使用兰纳德单抗,78例使用SC-pdC1-INH)。总体而言,46%至51%的患者有LTP经历。贝曲司他、lanadelumab和SC-pdC1-INH治疗的依从性(平均PDC)相似,分别为0.73、0.78和0.74。12个月后持续使用LTP指数的患者比例在不同的LTP中相似:贝曲司他、lanadelumab和SC-pdC1-INH分别为61%、58%和53%。亚组结果和敏感性分析支持主分析。结论:三种LTP治疗的依从性和坚持率均较高。贝洛特司他的依从性和持久性与主要分析中lanadelumab或SC-pdC1-INH起始后观察到的结果相当,在有两个或两个以上LTP要求的患者中,以及在根据第一个合格LTP要求分配的队列中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
35.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy & Asthma Proceedings is a peer reviewed publication dedicated to distributing timely scientific research regarding advancements in the knowledge and practice of allergy, asthma and immunology. Its primary readership consists of allergists and pulmonologists. The goal of the Proceedings is to publish articles with a predominantly clinical focus which directly impact quality of care for patients with allergic disease and asthma. Featured topics include asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, food allergies, allergic skin diseases, diagnostic techniques, allergens, and treatment modalities. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信