Lauren Tesoriero, Jennifer Kidd, Julie Piccione, Peter Izmirly, Meredith Akerman, Steven Carsons, Patricia Rekawek, Julie Nusbaum
{"title":"Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Sjogren's Disease Compared to Controls: An Interdisciplinary Approach with Maternal-Fetal Medicine.","authors":"Lauren Tesoriero, Jennifer Kidd, Julie Piccione, Peter Izmirly, Meredith Akerman, Steven Carsons, Patricia Rekawek, Julie Nusbaum","doi":"10.1055/a-2562-1643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Outside of the association of SS-A antibody with congenital heart block, little is known about adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, in patients with Sjogren's disease (SjD). Our study involved collaboration with maternal-fetal medicine (MFM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients: SjD patients were matched 1:3 with non-SjD controls. SjD patients were included by meeting the 2016 ACR/EULAR Criteria or by a rheumatologist diagnosis. Exclusion criteria were concurrent autoimmune disease or related antibodies. A composite of grouped outcomes was utilized and verified by MFM specialists. The primary outcome was adverse pregnancy outcome (APO) between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sample <i>t</i> -test and Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>48 patients were included: 12 SjD patients and 36 controls. APO was significantly increased in SjD with one preterm birth, one fetal growth restriction, and one limb anomaly; non-SjD had one cardiac anomaly. There were no cases of CHB. SjD patients were more likely to be delivered by cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls. No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found. We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology and future studies should be performed.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls.No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found.We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology, prompting future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"15 2","pages":"e47-e52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJP Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2562-1643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Outside of the association of SS-A antibody with congenital heart block, little is known about adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, in patients with Sjogren's disease (SjD). Our study involved collaboration with maternal-fetal medicine (MFM).
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients: SjD patients were matched 1:3 with non-SjD controls. SjD patients were included by meeting the 2016 ACR/EULAR Criteria or by a rheumatologist diagnosis. Exclusion criteria were concurrent autoimmune disease or related antibodies. A composite of grouped outcomes was utilized and verified by MFM specialists. The primary outcome was adverse pregnancy outcome (APO) between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sample t -test and Fisher's exact test.
Results: 48 patients were included: 12 SjD patients and 36 controls. APO was significantly increased in SjD with one preterm birth, one fetal growth restriction, and one limb anomaly; non-SjD had one cardiac anomaly. There were no cases of CHB. SjD patients were more likely to be delivered by cesarean delivery.
Conclusion: There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls. No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found. We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology and future studies should be performed.
Key points: There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls.No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found.We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology, prompting future studies.