Neighborhood Disadvantage, Built Environment, and Breast Cancer Outcomes: Disparities in Tumor Aggressiveness and Survival.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-04-29 DOI:10.3390/cancers17091502
Jie Shen, Yufan Guan, Supraja Gururaj, Kai Zhang, Qian Song, Xin Liu, Harry D Bear, Bernard F Fuemmeler, Roger T Anderson, Hua Zhao
{"title":"Neighborhood Disadvantage, Built Environment, and Breast Cancer Outcomes: Disparities in Tumor Aggressiveness and Survival.","authors":"Jie Shen, Yufan Guan, Supraja Gururaj, Kai Zhang, Qian Song, Xin Liu, Harry D Bear, Bernard F Fuemmeler, Roger T Anderson, Hua Zhao","doi":"10.3390/cancers17091502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer disparities persist globally, with growing evidence implicating neighborhood and built environmental factors in disease outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigates the associations between neighborhood disadvantage, environmental exposures, and breast tumor characteristics and survival among 3041 stage I-III breast cancer patients treated at the University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center (2014-2024). Neighborhood disadvantage was assessed via the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), while environmental exposures included PM2.5, green space (NDVI), and food indices (modified retail food environment index (mRFEI), retail food activity index (RFAI)). Multivariable regression and Cox models adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical covariates were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A higher ADI score was associated with aggressive tumor characteristics, including advanced stage (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% Confidence Interval (CI):1.01-1.11), poor differentiation (OR = 1.07, 1.01-1.15), ER-negative status (OR = 1.06, 1.01-1.12), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (OR = 1.08, 1.02-1.16), as well as younger diagnosis age (β = -0.22, -0.36 to -0.09). PM2.5 exposure was correlated with advanced tumor stage (OR = 1.24, 1.09-1.40 for stage III) but paradoxically predicted improved survival (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.71, 0.63-0.82). The food environment indices showed subtype-specific survival benefits: higher mRFEI and RFAI scores were linked to reduced mortality in ER-negative (HR = 0.45, 0.23-0.85 and HR = 0.61, 0.38-0.97) and TNBC (HR = 0.40, 0.18-0.90 and HR = 0.48, 0.26-0.87) patients. NDVI scores exhibited no significant associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings underscore the dual role of neighborhood disadvantage and the built environmental in breast cancer outcomes. While neighborhood disadvantage and PM2.5 exposure elevate tumor aggressiveness, survival disparities may be mediated by other factors. Improved food environments may enhance survival in aggressive subtypes, highlighting the need for integrated interventions addressing socioeconomic inequities, environmental risks, and nutritional support needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer disparities persist globally, with growing evidence implicating neighborhood and built environmental factors in disease outcomes.

Methods: This study investigates the associations between neighborhood disadvantage, environmental exposures, and breast tumor characteristics and survival among 3041 stage I-III breast cancer patients treated at the University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center (2014-2024). Neighborhood disadvantage was assessed via the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), while environmental exposures included PM2.5, green space (NDVI), and food indices (modified retail food environment index (mRFEI), retail food activity index (RFAI)). Multivariable regression and Cox models adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical covariates were employed.

Results: A higher ADI score was associated with aggressive tumor characteristics, including advanced stage (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% Confidence Interval (CI):1.01-1.11), poor differentiation (OR = 1.07, 1.01-1.15), ER-negative status (OR = 1.06, 1.01-1.12), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (OR = 1.08, 1.02-1.16), as well as younger diagnosis age (β = -0.22, -0.36 to -0.09). PM2.5 exposure was correlated with advanced tumor stage (OR = 1.24, 1.09-1.40 for stage III) but paradoxically predicted improved survival (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.71, 0.63-0.82). The food environment indices showed subtype-specific survival benefits: higher mRFEI and RFAI scores were linked to reduced mortality in ER-negative (HR = 0.45, 0.23-0.85 and HR = 0.61, 0.38-0.97) and TNBC (HR = 0.40, 0.18-0.90 and HR = 0.48, 0.26-0.87) patients. NDVI scores exhibited no significant associations.

Conclusion: Our findings underscore the dual role of neighborhood disadvantage and the built environmental in breast cancer outcomes. While neighborhood disadvantage and PM2.5 exposure elevate tumor aggressiveness, survival disparities may be mediated by other factors. Improved food environments may enhance survival in aggressive subtypes, highlighting the need for integrated interventions addressing socioeconomic inequities, environmental risks, and nutritional support needs.

邻里不利、建成环境和乳腺癌结局:肿瘤侵袭性和生存的差异。
背景:乳腺癌的差异在全球范围内持续存在,越来越多的证据表明社区和建筑环境因素与疾病结局有关。方法:本研究调查了2014-2024年在弗吉尼亚大学综合癌症中心治疗的3041例I-III期乳腺癌患者的社区不利条件、环境暴露与乳腺肿瘤特征和生存率之间的关系。通过区域剥夺指数(ADI)评估邻里劣势,而环境暴露包括PM2.5、绿地(NDVI)和食品指数(修正零售食品环境指数(mRFEI)、零售食品活动指数(RFAI))。采用多变量回归和Cox模型调整人口统计学、社会经济和临床协变量。结果:较高的ADI评分与侵袭性肿瘤特征相关,包括晚期(优势比(OR) = 1.06, 95%可信区间(CI):1.01-1.11),差分化(OR = 1.07, 1.01-1.15), er阴性状态(OR = 1.06, 1.01-1.12),三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC) (OR = 1.08, 1.02-1.16),以及较年轻的诊断年龄(β = -0.22, -0.36至-0.09)。PM2.5暴露与肿瘤晚期相关(III期OR = 1.24, 1.09-1.40),但矛盾的是,它预测了生存率的提高(风险比(HR) = 0.71, 0.63-0.82)。食物环境指数显示了亚型特异性生存益处:较高的mRFEI和RFAI评分与er阴性(HR = 0.45, 0.23-0.85和HR = 0.61, 0.38-0.97)和TNBC (HR = 0.40, 0.18-0.90和HR = 0.48, 0.26-0.87)患者的死亡率降低有关。NDVI评分无显著相关性。结论:我们的研究结果强调了社区劣势和建筑环境在乳腺癌预后中的双重作用。虽然邻里不利和PM2.5暴露会提高肿瘤的侵袭性,但生存差异可能是由其他因素介导的。改善食物环境可能会提高侵略性亚型的存活率,因此需要采取综合干预措施,解决社会经济不平等、环境风险和营养支持需求问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信