Predicting growth parameters of biofertilizer inoculated pepper, using root capacitance assessments and artificial neural networks in two soils.

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Flórián Kovács, Peter Sarcevic, Ákos Odry, Borbála Biró, Ingrid Gyalai, Enikő Papdi, Katalin Juhos
{"title":"Predicting growth parameters of biofertilizer inoculated pepper, using root capacitance assessments and artificial neural networks in two soils.","authors":"Flórián Kovács, Peter Sarcevic, Ákos Odry, Borbála Biró, Ingrid Gyalai, Enikő Papdi, Katalin Juhos","doi":"10.1007/s42977-025-00260-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monitoring the root system plays an important role in understanding plant physiological processes; however, its assessment using non-destructive methods remains challenging. Here, we evaluate the utility of root capacitance (C<sub>R</sub>) as a practical indicator of root function and its relationship to plant growth parameters in Capsicum annuum L. To improve the accuracy of root function assessment, we applied artificial neural networks (ANN) as a novel data evaluation approach, comparing its predictive performance against multiple linear regression (MLR). Across two soil types (sandy and sandy loam), we applied multiple treatments ranging from microbial inoculants to wool pellet and inorganic nitrogen sources primarily to test whether C<sub>R</sub> could detect differences in root activity and biomass production under different conditions. We measured root dry biomass, shoot dry biomass, and leaf N content, treating these variables as independent predictors in a statistical framework. Multiple linear regression (MLR) initially showed strong relationship between C<sub>R</sub> and both root and shoot biomass in sandy soil, and between C<sub>R</sub> and total plant N content in sandy loam. However, an ANN model consistently outperformed MLR in predicting C<sub>R</sub> from plant physiological parameters, as evidenced by lower mean absolute error (MAE) in all treatments. These findings confirm that C<sub>R</sub> correlates strongly with plant growth parameters and can reliably distinguish the effects of different soil amendments even those with markedly different nutrient-release profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":8853,"journal":{"name":"Biologia futura","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologia futura","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42977-025-00260-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monitoring the root system plays an important role in understanding plant physiological processes; however, its assessment using non-destructive methods remains challenging. Here, we evaluate the utility of root capacitance (CR) as a practical indicator of root function and its relationship to plant growth parameters in Capsicum annuum L. To improve the accuracy of root function assessment, we applied artificial neural networks (ANN) as a novel data evaluation approach, comparing its predictive performance against multiple linear regression (MLR). Across two soil types (sandy and sandy loam), we applied multiple treatments ranging from microbial inoculants to wool pellet and inorganic nitrogen sources primarily to test whether CR could detect differences in root activity and biomass production under different conditions. We measured root dry biomass, shoot dry biomass, and leaf N content, treating these variables as independent predictors in a statistical framework. Multiple linear regression (MLR) initially showed strong relationship between CR and both root and shoot biomass in sandy soil, and between CR and total plant N content in sandy loam. However, an ANN model consistently outperformed MLR in predicting CR from plant physiological parameters, as evidenced by lower mean absolute error (MAE) in all treatments. These findings confirm that CR correlates strongly with plant growth parameters and can reliably distinguish the effects of different soil amendments even those with markedly different nutrient-release profiles.

利用根容量评价和人工神经网络预测两种土壤中生物肥料接种辣椒的生长参数。
根系监测是了解植物生理过程的重要手段;然而,使用非破坏性方法对其进行评估仍然具有挑战性。为了提高根功能评估的准确性,我们将人工神经网络(ANN)作为一种新的数据评估方法,并将其与多元线性回归(MLR)的预测性能进行比较,研究了根容量(CR)作为根功能评估的实用指标及其与植株生长参数的关系。在两种土壤类型(砂质和砂质壤土)中,我们采用了多种处理,从微生物接种剂到羊毛颗粒和无机氮源,主要是为了测试CR是否可以检测不同条件下根系活性和生物量产量的差异。我们测量了根干生物量、茎干生物量和叶片氮含量,将这些变量作为统计框架中的独立预测因子。多元线性回归(MLR)初步表明,砂质土壤CR与根、茎生物量、砂壤土CR与植株全氮含量之间存在较强的相关性。然而,ANN模型在从植物生理参数预测CR方面始终优于MLR,所有处理的平均绝对误差(MAE)都较低。这些研究结果证实,CR与植物生长参数密切相关,可以可靠地区分不同土壤改良剂的影响,即使是那些养分释放谱明显不同的土壤改良剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biologia futura
Biologia futura Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: How can the scientific knowledge we possess now influence that future? That is, the FUTURE of Earth and life − of humankind. Can we make choices in the present to change our future? How can 21st century biological research ask proper scientific questions and find solid answers? Addressing these questions is the main goal of Biologia Futura (formerly Acta Biologica Hungarica). In keeping with the name, the new mission is to focus on areas of biology where major advances are to be expected, areas of biology with strong inter-disciplinary connection and to provide new avenues for future research in biology. Biologia Futura aims to publish articles from all fields of biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信