Exploring the Braden QD Scale Assessment Performance and Related Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury Influencing Factors among Critically Ill Adult Patients.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000301
Xiuli Zhu, Linhe Yang, Junjie Ning, Baoqin Li, Yang Chen, Zhenyu Luo
{"title":"Exploring the Braden QD Scale Assessment Performance and Related Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury Influencing Factors among Critically Ill Adult Patients.","authors":"Xiuli Zhu, Linhe Yang, Junjie Ning, Baoqin Li, Yang Chen, Zhenyu Luo","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the performance of the Braden QD Scale in predicting hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) in critically ill adult patients and the incidence and factors associated with HAPIs within such patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in a dual-center comprehensive ICU from June to September 2023. The nurse on duty examined all patients for skin integrity upon admission to the ICU and also scored patients using both the Braden and Braden QD scales. A patient's skin was then checked daily by 14 course-trained nurses until the patient was discharged or transferred out of the ICU. If a suspected HAPI was found, photographs were taken and sent to specialist nurses for confirmation and documentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 316 critically ill patients were enrolled in the study, and 79 HAPIs occurred. Fifty-five patients (17.4%) had pressure injuries (PIs), 35 patients (11.1%) had medical device-related PIs, and 14 patients (4.4%) had both medical device-related PIs and PIs. Essential predictors of HAPIs were detected. Further, the Braden QD Scale performed better than the Braden Scale in predicting HAPI development in critically ill adults, with the area under the curve being 0.77 (CI, 0.75-0.84) on admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of HAPIs in critically ill adult patients is high, with several influencing factors. The Braden QD Scale emerges as a validated predictive tool for HAPIs in critically ill adult patients, demonstrating clinical utility that warrants additional investigation to optimize prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"239-244"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the performance of the Braden QD Scale in predicting hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) in critically ill adult patients and the incidence and factors associated with HAPIs within such patients.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in a dual-center comprehensive ICU from June to September 2023. The nurse on duty examined all patients for skin integrity upon admission to the ICU and also scored patients using both the Braden and Braden QD scales. A patient's skin was then checked daily by 14 course-trained nurses until the patient was discharged or transferred out of the ICU. If a suspected HAPI was found, photographs were taken and sent to specialist nurses for confirmation and documentation.

Results: A total of 316 critically ill patients were enrolled in the study, and 79 HAPIs occurred. Fifty-five patients (17.4%) had pressure injuries (PIs), 35 patients (11.1%) had medical device-related PIs, and 14 patients (4.4%) had both medical device-related PIs and PIs. Essential predictors of HAPIs were detected. Further, the Braden QD Scale performed better than the Braden Scale in predicting HAPI development in critically ill adults, with the area under the curve being 0.77 (CI, 0.75-0.84) on admission.

Conclusions: The incidence of HAPIs in critically ill adult patients is high, with several influencing factors. The Braden QD Scale emerges as a validated predictive tool for HAPIs in critically ill adult patients, demonstrating clinical utility that warrants additional investigation to optimize prevention strategies.

成人危重病人Braden QD量表评估绩效及相关医院获得性压力损伤影响因素探讨
目的:探讨Braden QD量表对危重成人患者医院获得性压力损伤(HAPIs)的预测效果及其发生的相关因素。方法:于2023年6 - 9月在某双中心综合ICU进行前瞻性观察研究。值班护士在进入ICU时检查了所有患者的皮肤完整性,并使用Braden和Braden QD量表对患者进行评分。然后由14名经过课程培训的护士每天检查患者的皮肤,直到患者出院或转出ICU。如果发现疑似HAPI,则拍照并发送给专科护士进行确认和记录。结果:共纳入316例危重患者,发生HAPIs 79例。55例患者(17.4%)存在压力性损伤(PIs), 35例患者(11.1%)存在医疗器械相关的PIs, 14例患者(4.4%)同时存在医疗器械相关的PIs和PIs。检测了hapi的基本预测因子。此外,Braden QD量表在预测危重成人HAPI发展方面优于Braden量表,入院时曲线下面积为0.77 (CI, 0.75-0.84)。结论:成人危重患者HAPIs发生率高,影响因素多。Braden QD量表成为危重成人患者HAPIs的有效预测工具,证明了临床效用,值得进一步研究以优化预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信