Using a Single Measure To Assess Adherence and Differentiation in Family Therapy for Adolescent Externalizing Problems.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Stephanie Violante, Bryce D McLeod, Aaron Hogue
{"title":"Using a Single Measure To Assess Adherence and Differentiation in Family Therapy for Adolescent Externalizing Problems.","authors":"Stephanie Violante, Bryce D McLeod, Aaron Hogue","doi":"10.1007/s10488-025-01445-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The interpretation of effectiveness research can be enhanced by understanding what prescribed (i.e., adherence) and non-prescribed (i.e., differentiation) techniques were delivered. However, few measures exist that can assess both adherence and differentiation. The current study examined how the Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy Revised Strategies Scale (TPOCS-RS) can assess adherence to and differentiation from family therapy for youth with externalizing problems. Treatment sessions (N = 103) from 42 adolescents (M age = 15.0, SD = 1.4; 47.6% female; 59.5% Hispanic/Latinx/e, 19.0% Black, 11.9% multiracial, 4.8% other race) with primary externalizing problems treated by 24 clinicians (M age = 33.2, SD = 8.3; 66.7% female; 33.3% Hispanic/Latinx/e, 20.8% White, 12.5% Asian, 8.3% multiracial, 8.3% other race) in routine practice settings were coded with the TPOCS-RS. Treatment sessions were from three groups: (a) routine family therapy, (b) routine family therapy plus the medication integration protocol, or (c) usual care. Interrater reliability for the TPOCS-RS Family Therapy subscale was ICC = 0.90, and scores demonstrated evidence of convergent and discriminant validity via associations with treatment integrity and alliance measures. The TPOCS-RS Family Therapy subscale also demonstrated evidence of discriminative validity by identifying expected group differences. Results provide preliminary evidence that the TPOCS-RS can measure adherence to and differentiation from family therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-025-01445-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interpretation of effectiveness research can be enhanced by understanding what prescribed (i.e., adherence) and non-prescribed (i.e., differentiation) techniques were delivered. However, few measures exist that can assess both adherence and differentiation. The current study examined how the Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy Revised Strategies Scale (TPOCS-RS) can assess adherence to and differentiation from family therapy for youth with externalizing problems. Treatment sessions (N = 103) from 42 adolescents (M age = 15.0, SD = 1.4; 47.6% female; 59.5% Hispanic/Latinx/e, 19.0% Black, 11.9% multiracial, 4.8% other race) with primary externalizing problems treated by 24 clinicians (M age = 33.2, SD = 8.3; 66.7% female; 33.3% Hispanic/Latinx/e, 20.8% White, 12.5% Asian, 8.3% multiracial, 8.3% other race) in routine practice settings were coded with the TPOCS-RS. Treatment sessions were from three groups: (a) routine family therapy, (b) routine family therapy plus the medication integration protocol, or (c) usual care. Interrater reliability for the TPOCS-RS Family Therapy subscale was ICC = 0.90, and scores demonstrated evidence of convergent and discriminant validity via associations with treatment integrity and alliance measures. The TPOCS-RS Family Therapy subscale also demonstrated evidence of discriminative validity by identifying expected group differences. Results provide preliminary evidence that the TPOCS-RS can measure adherence to and differentiation from family therapy.

使用单一测量方法评估青少年外化问题家庭治疗的依从性和差异性。
通过了解规定的(即依从性)和非规定的(即差异化)技术是什么,可以加强对有效性研究的解释。然而,很少有措施可以同时评估依从性和分化。本研究考察了儿童心理治疗修订策略量表的治疗过程观察编码系统(TPOCS-RS)如何评估外化问题青少年对家庭治疗的依从性和区别性。治疗疗程(N = 103)来自42名青少年(M年龄= 15.0,SD = 1.4;47.6%的女性;59.5%西班牙裔/拉丁裔/黑人,19.0%黑人,11.9%多种族,4.8%其他种族),24名临床医生治疗了原发性外化问题(M年龄= 33.2,SD = 8.3;66.7%的女性;使用TPOCS-RS对常规执业环境中33.3%的西班牙裔/拉丁裔/e、20.8%的白人、12.5%的亚洲人、8.3%的多种族、8.3%的其他种族进行编码。治疗阶段分为三组:(a)常规家庭治疗,(b)常规家庭治疗加药物整合方案,或(c)常规护理。TPOCS-RS家庭治疗量表的量表间信度为ICC = 0.90,通过与治疗完整性和联盟措施的关联,得分证明了收敛效度和区别效度的证据。TPOCS-RS家庭治疗量表也通过识别预期组差异证明了区别效度的证据。结果提供了初步证据,证明TPOCS-RS可以衡量家庭治疗的依从性和分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信