Effectiveness of myofascial therapy (MFT) along with traditional physiotherapy and intermittent prophylaxis on short-term improvement of joint health in hemophilic arthropathy: a randomized control trial.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Expert Review of Hematology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1080/17474086.2025.2495674
Mridul Makkar, Mullai S Dhinakaran, Prateek Shukla, Diksha Sarwan, Soumya Ojha, M Joseph John
{"title":"Effectiveness of myofascial therapy (MFT) along with traditional physiotherapy and intermittent prophylaxis on short-term improvement of joint health in hemophilic arthropathy: a randomized control trial.","authors":"Mridul Makkar, Mullai S Dhinakaran, Prateek Shukla, Diksha Sarwan, Soumya Ojha, M Joseph John","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2495674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myofascial therapy (MFT) works on biomechanical soft tissue loading principles aimed to reduce pain, improve tissue mobility and function.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To find effectiveness of MFT and traditional physiotherapy with intermittent prophylaxis on short-term improvement of joint health in hemophilic arthropathy.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Thirty-one patients with Hemophilia A and joint arthropathy (elbows and/or knees) were randomly divided into MFT group (MFT  +  traditional physiotherapy) and control group (traditional physiotherapy). Both groups received four physiotherapy sessions per week for three weeks and FVIII prophylaxis twice weekly. Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), Functional Independence Scoring for Haemophilia (FISH), and Range of Motion (ROM) were assessed on Day 0, 10, 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MFT group demonstrated a significant improvement in their overall HJHS scores (<i>p</i> = 0.016, d = 0.93) and HJHS knee joint scores (<i>p</i> = 0.007, d = 0.57) compared to control group participants. ROM increased substantially in MFT group relative to control group (18.97%; 10.10% improvement in knee and elbow ROM, respectively, vs 9.49%; 1.25%). There was an improvement in FISH scores in both groups, with a slightly greater improvement in control group (13.68% vs 11.08%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MFT is effective and feasible in short-term improvement of joint health in Hemophilia A patients with elbow and knee arthropathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"471-479"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2495674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Myofascial therapy (MFT) works on biomechanical soft tissue loading principles aimed to reduce pain, improve tissue mobility and function.

Aim: To find effectiveness of MFT and traditional physiotherapy with intermittent prophylaxis on short-term improvement of joint health in hemophilic arthropathy.

Research design and methods: Thirty-one patients with Hemophilia A and joint arthropathy (elbows and/or knees) were randomly divided into MFT group (MFT  +  traditional physiotherapy) and control group (traditional physiotherapy). Both groups received four physiotherapy sessions per week for three weeks and FVIII prophylaxis twice weekly. Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), Functional Independence Scoring for Haemophilia (FISH), and Range of Motion (ROM) were assessed on Day 0, 10, 21.

Results: MFT group demonstrated a significant improvement in their overall HJHS scores (p = 0.016, d = 0.93) and HJHS knee joint scores (p = 0.007, d = 0.57) compared to control group participants. ROM increased substantially in MFT group relative to control group (18.97%; 10.10% improvement in knee and elbow ROM, respectively, vs 9.49%; 1.25%). There was an improvement in FISH scores in both groups, with a slightly greater improvement in control group (13.68% vs 11.08%).

Conclusions: MFT is effective and feasible in short-term improvement of joint health in Hemophilia A patients with elbow and knee arthropathy.

肌筋膜疗法(MFT)联合传统物理疗法和间歇性预防对血友病关节健康短期改善的有效性:一项随机对照试验
背景:肌筋膜疗法(MFT)是一种基于生物力学的软组织负荷疗法,旨在减轻疼痛,改善组织活动和功能。目的:探讨MFT与传统物理治疗联合间歇预防对血友病关节健康的短期改善效果。研究设计与方法:将31例A型血友病合并关节病变(肘部和/或膝关节)患者随机分为MFT组(MFT +传统物理治疗)和对照组(传统物理治疗)。两组患者每周接受四次物理治疗,持续三周,每周接受两次FVIII预防治疗。在第0、10、21天分别评估血友病关节健康评分(HJHS)、血友病功能独立评分(FISH)和活动范围(ROM)。结果:与对照组相比,MFT组患者HJHS总分(p = 0.016, d = 0.93)和HJHS膝关节评分(p = 0.007, d = 0.57)均有显著提高。MFT组相对于对照组ROM显著升高(18.97%;膝关节和肘部ROM分别改善10.10%和9.49%;1.25%)。两组患者FISH评分均有改善,对照组改善幅度略大(13.68% vs 11.08%)。结论:MFT短期改善A型血友病伴肘关节病变患者关节健康是有效可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信