Salvage of dislodged percutaneous nephrostomy catheter through the original tract: feasibility and factors affecting technical failure of reinsertion.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mizuki Ozawa, Miyuki Sone, Shunsuke Sugawara, Shintaro Kimura, Rakuhei Nakama, Takumi Oshima
{"title":"Salvage of dislodged percutaneous nephrostomy catheter through the original tract: feasibility and factors affecting technical failure of reinsertion.","authors":"Mizuki Ozawa, Miyuki Sone, Shunsuke Sugawara, Shintaro Kimura, Rakuhei Nakama, Takumi Oshima","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04952-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) is a standard procedure to relieve urinary obstruction. Inadvertent catheter dislodgement occurs in up to 15% of cases, and one of the management options is to replace the new catheter through the original tract. Although previous studies have reported the feasibility of reinserting a new catheter through the original tract, few studies have described the factors contributing to technical failure. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and factors affecting the technical failure of reinsertion of dislodged PCN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>53 procedures of 42 patients who underwent reinsertion of dislodged PCN through the original tract were retrospectively reviewed. All procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance using an angiographic catheter and a guidewire to search the original tract. After confirming access to the renal pelvis, a new catheter was inserted. Technical success was defined as the successful placement of a new catheter through the original tract. Patient characteristics, procedure details, and duration since initial PCN placement, the last replacement and dislodgement were statistically compared between technical success and failure groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success was achieved in 45 of 53 procedures (85%). Univariate analysis revealed that significant factors affecting technical failure were the smaller size of the catheter (P = 0.05), procedure time (P =  < 0.001), and duration since initial PCN placement (P = 0.001). Sex was also a significant factor; however, this may be the error due to the small sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Salvage of dislodged PCN by inserting a catheter through the original tract was feasible. However, technical failure of catheter reinsertion was significantly affected by the shorter duration since initial PCN placement and the smaller size of catheters.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04952-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) is a standard procedure to relieve urinary obstruction. Inadvertent catheter dislodgement occurs in up to 15% of cases, and one of the management options is to replace the new catheter through the original tract. Although previous studies have reported the feasibility of reinserting a new catheter through the original tract, few studies have described the factors contributing to technical failure. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and factors affecting the technical failure of reinsertion of dislodged PCN.

Methods: 53 procedures of 42 patients who underwent reinsertion of dislodged PCN through the original tract were retrospectively reviewed. All procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance using an angiographic catheter and a guidewire to search the original tract. After confirming access to the renal pelvis, a new catheter was inserted. Technical success was defined as the successful placement of a new catheter through the original tract. Patient characteristics, procedure details, and duration since initial PCN placement, the last replacement and dislodgement were statistically compared between technical success and failure groups.

Results: Technical success was achieved in 45 of 53 procedures (85%). Univariate analysis revealed that significant factors affecting technical failure were the smaller size of the catheter (P = 0.05), procedure time (P =  < 0.001), and duration since initial PCN placement (P = 0.001). Sex was also a significant factor; however, this may be the error due to the small sample size.

Conclusion: Salvage of dislodged PCN by inserting a catheter through the original tract was feasible. However, technical failure of catheter reinsertion was significantly affected by the shorter duration since initial PCN placement and the smaller size of catheters.

经皮肾造瘘导管原道移位术的可行性及影响技术失败的因素。
目的:经皮肾造口术(PCN)是缓解尿路梗阻的标准手术。多达15%的病例会发生导管意外脱位,其中一种治疗方法是通过原尿道更换新导管。虽然先前的研究报道了通过原尿道重新插入新导管的可行性,但很少有研究描述导致技术失败的因素。本研究旨在探讨移位PCN复插的可行性及影响技术失效的因素。方法:回顾性分析42例53例脱位PCN经原尿道重新置入的病例。所有手术均在透视引导下进行,使用血管造影导管和导丝搜索原始通道。确认进入肾盂后,插入新的导尿管。技术上的成功被定义为通过原尿道成功放置新导管。在技术成功组和失败组之间,对患者特征、手术细节、初始PCN放置、最后一次置换和移位的持续时间进行统计学比较。结果:53例手术中技术成功率45例(85%)。单因素分析显示,导管尺寸较小(P = 0.05)、手术时间(P = 0.05)是影响技术失败的重要因素。结论:通过原道插入导管挽救移位的PCN是可行的。然而,由于初始PCN放置时间较短和导管尺寸较小,导管重新插入的技术失败受到显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信