Sleeping for two: a cross-sectional study on associations between objectively measured sleep during early to mid-pregnancy and maternal and fetal outcomes and inflammatory biomarker profiles.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Caitlin Macdonald, Tryfonas Pitsillos, Anna-Karin Wikström, Alkistis Skalkidou, Peter Meerlo, Jocelien Olivier, Jelmer Prins, Inger Sundström Poromaa, Theodora Kunovac Kallak
{"title":"Sleeping for two: a cross-sectional study on associations between objectively measured sleep during early to mid-pregnancy and maternal and fetal outcomes and inflammatory biomarker profiles.","authors":"Caitlin Macdonald, Tryfonas Pitsillos, Anna-Karin Wikström, Alkistis Skalkidou, Peter Meerlo, Jocelien Olivier, Jelmer Prins, Inger Sundström Poromaa, Theodora Kunovac Kallak","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07634-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnant women often experience subjective sleep disturbances shown to be associated with maternal and fetal outcomes. However, subjectively experienced sleep often deviates from objective measurements. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the relationship between objectively measured sleep in early to mid-pregnancy and maternal and fetal outcomes and inflammatory biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A total of 1,610 pregnant women aged 18 or older from the Safe Physical Activity in Pregnancy (SPAP) study were recruited during early (week 10-14) to mid-pregnancy (week 16-19). Blood samples were taken and sleep was monitored using an Actiwatch, tracking total sleep time, sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset, and sleep onset latency for 7 days in early to mid-pregnancy. A combined sleep categorisation was created using total sleep time and sleep efficiency to categorise participants into three sleep quality groups: Good, Intermediate, and Poor. Maternal and fetal outcomes were collected via questionnaires, medical records, and plasma samples were analysed using the Olink cardiovascular paneI Il (n = 407).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,444 participants were included. The women were categorized as good sleepers (50.4%), intermediate (32.6%), or poor sleepers (17.0%) based on the distribution of the participant's sleep parameters. Poor sleep was more common in women born outside Europe, those with higher pre-gestational BMI, and those with pre-pregnancy diabetes. Sleep groups did not differ in metabolic factors. Poor sleep was associated with an increased likelihood of requiring an emergency caesarean section (AOR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.13-3.05). No significant associations were found for other outcomes such as pre-eclampsia, premature birth, small for gestational age etc. Nine inflammatory biomarkers were significantly lower in poor sleepers, while one marker was higher.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Poor sleep in early to mid-pregnancy was more common in pregnant women with pre-pregnancy diabetes, obesity, and those born outside of Europe. Poor sleep was associated with a higher likelihood of emergency caesarean section, but no other maternal or fetal outcomes. An overall trend was observed towards lower levels of inflammatory markers in women that slept poorly; however, additional studies are needed to better understand the immune system's role in the relationship between sleep, maternal health, and maternal and fetal outcomes. Possible mechanisms underlying these associations warrant further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"533"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07634-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pregnant women often experience subjective sleep disturbances shown to be associated with maternal and fetal outcomes. However, subjectively experienced sleep often deviates from objective measurements. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the relationship between objectively measured sleep in early to mid-pregnancy and maternal and fetal outcomes and inflammatory biomarkers.

Methodology: A total of 1,610 pregnant women aged 18 or older from the Safe Physical Activity in Pregnancy (SPAP) study were recruited during early (week 10-14) to mid-pregnancy (week 16-19). Blood samples were taken and sleep was monitored using an Actiwatch, tracking total sleep time, sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset, and sleep onset latency for 7 days in early to mid-pregnancy. A combined sleep categorisation was created using total sleep time and sleep efficiency to categorise participants into three sleep quality groups: Good, Intermediate, and Poor. Maternal and fetal outcomes were collected via questionnaires, medical records, and plasma samples were analysed using the Olink cardiovascular paneI Il (n = 407).

Results: A total of 1,444 participants were included. The women were categorized as good sleepers (50.4%), intermediate (32.6%), or poor sleepers (17.0%) based on the distribution of the participant's sleep parameters. Poor sleep was more common in women born outside Europe, those with higher pre-gestational BMI, and those with pre-pregnancy diabetes. Sleep groups did not differ in metabolic factors. Poor sleep was associated with an increased likelihood of requiring an emergency caesarean section (AOR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.13-3.05). No significant associations were found for other outcomes such as pre-eclampsia, premature birth, small for gestational age etc. Nine inflammatory biomarkers were significantly lower in poor sleepers, while one marker was higher.

Conclusion: Poor sleep in early to mid-pregnancy was more common in pregnant women with pre-pregnancy diabetes, obesity, and those born outside of Europe. Poor sleep was associated with a higher likelihood of emergency caesarean section, but no other maternal or fetal outcomes. An overall trend was observed towards lower levels of inflammatory markers in women that slept poorly; however, additional studies are needed to better understand the immune system's role in the relationship between sleep, maternal health, and maternal and fetal outcomes. Possible mechanisms underlying these associations warrant further research.

两个人的睡眠:一项关于怀孕早期到中期客观测量的睡眠与母婴结局和炎症生物标志物之间关系的横断面研究。
背景:孕妇经常经历主观睡眠障碍,这与母体和胎儿的结局有关。然而,主观体验的睡眠往往偏离客观测量。因此,本研究的目的是探讨妊娠早期至中期客观测量的睡眠与母胎结局和炎症生物标志物之间的关系。研究方法:在妊娠早期(10-14周)至妊娠中期(16-19周)共招募了1610名18岁或以上的孕妇,这些孕妇来自孕期安全体育活动(SPAP)研究。采集血液样本,使用Actiwatch监测睡眠,跟踪妊娠早期至中期7天的总睡眠时间、睡眠效率、睡眠开始后的醒来情况和睡眠开始潜伏期。根据总睡眠时间和睡眠效率,将参与者分为三个睡眠质量组:良好、中等和较差。通过问卷调查、医疗记录收集产妇和胎儿的结局,并使用Olink心血管小组Il分析血浆样本(n = 407)。结果:共纳入1444名参与者。根据参与者的睡眠参数分布,这些女性被分为良好睡眠者(50.4%)、中等睡眠者(32.6%)和差睡眠者(17.0%)。在欧洲以外出生的女性、孕前身体质量指数较高的女性以及孕前患有糖尿病的女性中,睡眠不足更为常见。睡眠组在代谢因素上没有差异。睡眠不佳与需要紧急剖腹产的可能性增加相关(AOR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.13-3.05)。其他结果如先兆子痫、早产、小于胎龄等未发现显著关联。睡眠不佳的人有九种炎症生物标志物明显较低,而有一种标志物较高。结论:妊娠早期到中期睡眠不足在妊娠前患有糖尿病、肥胖和非欧洲出生的孕妇中更为常见。睡眠不佳与紧急剖腹产的可能性增加有关,但没有其他母婴结局。总的趋势是,睡眠质量差的女性炎症标志物水平较低;然而,需要更多的研究来更好地了解免疫系统在睡眠、孕产妇健康和母婴结局之间的关系中的作用。这些关联背后的可能机制值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信