Moderators and mediators of pain and function outcomes in a new service delivery model for management of knee osteoarthritis in primary care (PARTNER): Secondary exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Abdolhay Farivar, Jocelyn L Bowden, Kim L Bennell, Andrew M Briggs, Stephen J Bunker, Rana S Hinman, Thorlene Egerton, Simon D French, Marie Pirotta, Karen Schuck, Venkatesha Venkatesha, Nicholas A Zwar, David J Hunter
{"title":"Moderators and mediators of pain and function outcomes in a new service delivery model for management of knee osteoarthritis in primary care (PARTNER): Secondary exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Abdolhay Farivar, Jocelyn L Bowden, Kim L Bennell, Andrew M Briggs, Stephen J Bunker, Rana S Hinman, Thorlene Egerton, Simon D French, Marie Pirotta, Karen Schuck, Venkatesha Venkatesha, Nicholas A Zwar, David J Hunter","doi":"10.1002/acr.25564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Explore moderators and mediators influenced changes in pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) receiving a new model of primary care service delivery (PARTNER), at 12 months (ACTRN12617001595303).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analyses of a cluster randomized controlled trial comparing PARTNER to usual general practitioner-delivered care (n=217, 112 PARTNER, 105 usual care) on knee pain/function. Pain was measured using a Numerical Rating Scale (range 0-10, higher= worse) and the function measured using the function subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (range 0-100, higher= better). Baseline variables selected as potential moderators included age, sex, body mass index, pain duration, residential state, living arrangements, education, employment status, back pain and other joint issues. Mediation variables included physical activity, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, OA self-management, self-efficacy, sleep, fatigue, quality-of-life, depression, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For change in pain, no moderators influenced the intervention effect. However, age moderated change in function, with intervention participants <50 years demonstrating greater functional improvement than older counterparts, compared to the control group (50-69 years: coefficient -32.88 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): -45.02, -20.74], >=70 years: coefficient -24.28 [95%CI: -36.53, -12.02]). Mediation analysis revealed significant indirect effects of overall, treatment-related, and symptom-related satisfaction on mean change in pain (-0.10, -0.06, and -0.08, respectively) and function (0.09, 0.05, and 0.07, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Younger PARTNER participants showed greater functional improvement compared to older age groups (moderating effect). Additionally, indirect mediation effects suggest increased satisfaction across the three satisfaction domains led to reduced knee pain and enhanced function.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Explore moderators and mediators influenced changes in pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) receiving a new model of primary care service delivery (PARTNER), at 12 months (ACTRN12617001595303).
Methods: Secondary analyses of a cluster randomized controlled trial comparing PARTNER to usual general practitioner-delivered care (n=217, 112 PARTNER, 105 usual care) on knee pain/function. Pain was measured using a Numerical Rating Scale (range 0-10, higher= worse) and the function measured using the function subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (range 0-100, higher= better). Baseline variables selected as potential moderators included age, sex, body mass index, pain duration, residential state, living arrangements, education, employment status, back pain and other joint issues. Mediation variables included physical activity, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, OA self-management, self-efficacy, sleep, fatigue, quality-of-life, depression, and satisfaction.
Results: For change in pain, no moderators influenced the intervention effect. However, age moderated change in function, with intervention participants <50 years demonstrating greater functional improvement than older counterparts, compared to the control group (50-69 years: coefficient -32.88 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): -45.02, -20.74], >=70 years: coefficient -24.28 [95%CI: -36.53, -12.02]). Mediation analysis revealed significant indirect effects of overall, treatment-related, and symptom-related satisfaction on mean change in pain (-0.10, -0.06, and -0.08, respectively) and function (0.09, 0.05, and 0.07, respectively).
Conclusion: Younger PARTNER participants showed greater functional improvement compared to older age groups (moderating effect). Additionally, indirect mediation effects suggest increased satisfaction across the three satisfaction domains led to reduced knee pain and enhanced function.
期刊介绍:
Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.