Construction and initial validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (ITQ-CG): assessing ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD in children from caregiver perspective.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Alexander Haselgruber, Dina Weindl-Wagner, Andrea Zagaria, Karin Zajec, Judith Noske, Brigitte Lueger-Schuster
{"title":"Construction and initial validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (ITQ-CG): assessing ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD in children from caregiver perspective.","authors":"Alexander Haselgruber, Dina Weindl-Wagner, Andrea Zagaria, Karin Zajec, Judith Noske, Brigitte Lueger-Schuster","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2493025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b><b>Objective:</b> The 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) introduces Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) as two distinct trauma-related disorders. The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is the most widely used measure of assessment and has been adapted for use in children and adolescents (ITQ-CA), but a corresponding caregiver version is still missing. We aimed to close this gap by adapting the ITQ-CA and provide an initial validation of the ITQ - Caregiver Version (ITQ-CG). A corresponding measure of assessment from caregiver-perspective is integral for the use in child psychology, psychiatry and research.<b>Method:</b> Altogether, 326 children and adolescents who attended the department of child and adolescent psychiatry were rated by their caregivers using a set of standardized measures. Excluding patients due to missing data or no trauma exposure, a final sample of 223 patients was analysed. Factorial structure of the ITQ-CG and multiple forms of validity were examined using confirmatory factor, latent class and correlation analysis.<b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor higher-order model of ICD-11 CPTSD as the factorial structure of the ITQ-CG. Convergent-divergent validity of main- and subscales of the ITQ-CG was evidenced by respective correlations with criterion variables. Latent class analysis supported the discriminant validity of the ITQ-CG, identifying a CPTSD-, PTSD-, DSO- and low symptoms-class. The CPTSD-class was associated with highest rates of comorbid psychopathology and functional impairment. Concurrent validity was evidenced by satisfactory concordance between caregiver- and child-reports.<b>Conclusion:</b> This study provides the construction and initial validation of the ITQ-CG to assess ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD in children and adolescents from caregiver-perspective. We found compelling evidence for the ITQ-CGs validity, identifying it as an easy-to-use screening instrument to assess ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD from caregiver-perspective. The ITQ-CG is freely available for clinicians and researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2493025"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2493025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjective: The 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) introduces Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) as two distinct trauma-related disorders. The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is the most widely used measure of assessment and has been adapted for use in children and adolescents (ITQ-CA), but a corresponding caregiver version is still missing. We aimed to close this gap by adapting the ITQ-CA and provide an initial validation of the ITQ - Caregiver Version (ITQ-CG). A corresponding measure of assessment from caregiver-perspective is integral for the use in child psychology, psychiatry and research.Method: Altogether, 326 children and adolescents who attended the department of child and adolescent psychiatry were rated by their caregivers using a set of standardized measures. Excluding patients due to missing data or no trauma exposure, a final sample of 223 patients was analysed. Factorial structure of the ITQ-CG and multiple forms of validity were examined using confirmatory factor, latent class and correlation analysis.Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor higher-order model of ICD-11 CPTSD as the factorial structure of the ITQ-CG. Convergent-divergent validity of main- and subscales of the ITQ-CG was evidenced by respective correlations with criterion variables. Latent class analysis supported the discriminant validity of the ITQ-CG, identifying a CPTSD-, PTSD-, DSO- and low symptoms-class. The CPTSD-class was associated with highest rates of comorbid psychopathology and functional impairment. Concurrent validity was evidenced by satisfactory concordance between caregiver- and child-reports.Conclusion: This study provides the construction and initial validation of the ITQ-CG to assess ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD in children and adolescents from caregiver-perspective. We found compelling evidence for the ITQ-CGs validity, identifying it as an easy-to-use screening instrument to assess ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD from caregiver-perspective. The ITQ-CG is freely available for clinicians and researchers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

国际创伤问卷-照顾者版(ITQ-CG)的构建和初步验证:从照顾者的角度评估ICD-11儿童PTSD和CPTSD。
摘要目的:第11版国际疾病分类(ICD-11)将创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)作为两种不同的创伤相关疾病引入。国际创伤问卷(ITQ)是最广泛使用的评估措施,并已适用于儿童和青少年(ITQ- ca),但相应的护理人员版本仍然缺失。我们的目标是通过调整ITQ- ca来缩小这一差距,并提供ITQ-护理人员版本(ITQ- cg)的初步验证。从照顾者的角度评估的相应措施是不可或缺的,用于儿童心理学,精神病学和研究。方法:共有326名在儿童和青少年精神科就诊的儿童和青少年由其护理人员使用一套标准化的措施进行评分。排除数据缺失或无创伤暴露的患者,对223例患者的最终样本进行了分析。采用验证性因子、潜在类和相关分析对ITQ-CG的析因结构和多种形式的效度进行检验。结果:验证性因子分析支持ICD-11 CPTSD的双因素高阶模型作为ITQ-CG的因子结构。ITQ-CG主量表和子量表的收敛-发散效度分别与标准变量的相关性得到证明。潜在类别分析支持ITQ-CG的判别效度,确定了CPTSD-、PTSD-、DSO-和低症状类别。cptsd等级与最高的共病精神病理和功能障碍发生率相关。同时效度的证据是照料者和儿童报告之间令人满意的一致性。结论:本研究构建并初步验证了ITQ-CG从照顾者角度评估儿童青少年ICD-11 PTSD和CPTSD。我们为itq - cg的有效性找到了令人信服的证据,从护理者的角度将其确定为一种易于使用的筛查工具,用于评估ICD-11 PTSD和CPTSD。ITQ-CG可供临床医生和研究人员免费使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信