Minimal Important Changes of Common Outcome Measures of Physical Function in Individuals with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Clinical Study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Rebecca B Ramalho, Thais C Chaves, Berend Terluin, Luiz F A Selistre
{"title":"Minimal Important Changes of Common Outcome Measures of Physical Function in Individuals with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Clinical Study.","authors":"Rebecca B Ramalho, Thais C Chaves, Berend Terluin, Luiz F A Selistre","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the Minimal Important Change (MIC) for the 40-meter Fast Paced Walk Test (40m FPWT), the 30-second Chair Stand Test (30s CST), 11-step Stair Climb Test (11-step SCT) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index - physical function subscale (WOMAC-PF) in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) according to three methods described in the literature.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective clinical study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Physiotherapy at Federal University of São Carlos (Brazil) PARTICIPANTS: A total of 107 participants.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Performance-based tests and WOMAC-PF were applied. After six months the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale was used to evaluate changes in physical function. A GPE cut-off score was established to categorize participants as improved or not improved. The MIC<sub>mean</sub>, MIC<sub>ROC</sub>, and MIC<sub>adjusted</sub> were calculated. Anchor reliability was assessed through longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 80 study participants, 19 were in the improved group. The MIC<sub>mean</sub> of the subgroups ranged from 0.07 to 0.29 m/s for the 40m FPWT, from 2.07 to 5.29 stands for the 30s CST, from 2.14 to 5.58s for the 11-step SCT, and from 4.21 to 27 for the WOMAC-PF. The MIC<sub>ROC</sub> values were 0.14 m/s for the 40m FPWT, 1.5 stands for the 30s CST, 1.79s for the 11-step SCT and 4.5 for the WOMAC-PF. The MIC<sub>adjusted</sub> values were 0.10 m/s for the 40m FPWT, 0.7 stands for the 30s CST, 4.0s for the 11-step SCT and 12.8 for the WOMAC-PF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MIC<sub>adjusted</sub> method considers both the proportion of improved patients and the reliability of transition ratings, making it preferable to MIC<sub>mean</sub> and MIC<sub>ROC</sub>. However, more high-quality studies are needed to assess its performance in samples with floor or ceiling effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the Minimal Important Change (MIC) for the 40-meter Fast Paced Walk Test (40m FPWT), the 30-second Chair Stand Test (30s CST), 11-step Stair Climb Test (11-step SCT) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index - physical function subscale (WOMAC-PF) in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) according to three methods described in the literature.

Design: A prospective clinical study.

Setting: Department of Physiotherapy at Federal University of São Carlos (Brazil) PARTICIPANTS: A total of 107 participants.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measure: Performance-based tests and WOMAC-PF were applied. After six months the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale was used to evaluate changes in physical function. A GPE cut-off score was established to categorize participants as improved or not improved. The MICmean, MICROC, and MICadjusted were calculated. Anchor reliability was assessed through longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis.

Results: Out of 80 study participants, 19 were in the improved group. The MICmean of the subgroups ranged from 0.07 to 0.29 m/s for the 40m FPWT, from 2.07 to 5.29 stands for the 30s CST, from 2.14 to 5.58s for the 11-step SCT, and from 4.21 to 27 for the WOMAC-PF. The MICROC values were 0.14 m/s for the 40m FPWT, 1.5 stands for the 30s CST, 1.79s for the 11-step SCT and 4.5 for the WOMAC-PF. The MICadjusted values were 0.10 m/s for the 40m FPWT, 0.7 stands for the 30s CST, 4.0s for the 11-step SCT and 12.8 for the WOMAC-PF.

Conclusion: The MICadjusted method considers both the proportion of improved patients and the reliability of transition ratings, making it preferable to MICmean and MICROC. However, more high-quality studies are needed to assess its performance in samples with floor or ceiling effects.

膝骨关节炎患者身体功能常见结局指标的微小重要变化:一项前瞻性临床研究。
目的:根据文献中描述的三种方法,研究40米快步步行测试(40m FPWT)、30秒椅子站立测试(30s CST)、11步爬楼梯测试(11步SCT)和西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数-身体功能量表(WOMAC-PF)在膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者中的最小重要变化(MIC)。设计:前瞻性临床研究。地点:巴西奥卡洛斯联邦大学物理治疗系研究对象:共107名研究对象。干预措施:不适用。主要结局指标:采用基于性能的测试和WOMAC-PF。6个月后,使用GPE量表评估身体功能的变化。建立GPE分界点评分,将参与者分为改善或未改善。计算MICmean、MICROC和MICadjusted。通过纵向验证性因子分析评估锚定信度。结果:在80名研究参与者中,有19人处于改善组。40m FPWT的MICmean为0.07 ~ 0.29 m/s, 30 m CST为2.07 ~ 5.29 m/s, 11步SCT为2.14 ~ 5.58s, WOMAC-PF为4.21 ~ 27 m/s。40m FPWT的MICROC值为0.14 m/s, 30s CST为1.5,11步SCT为1.79s, WOMAC-PF为4.5。40m FPWT的mic调整值为0.10 m/s, 30s CST为0.7,11步SCT为4.0 m/s, WOMAC-PF为12.8。结论:mic调整后的方法兼顾了改善患者的比例和过渡评分的可靠性,优于MICmean和MICROC。然而,需要更多高质量的研究来评估其在具有地板或天花板效应的样本中的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信