Uncertainty and decision-making in critical care: lessons from managing COVID-19 ARDS in preparation for the next pandemic.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Kenki Matsumoto, John R Prowle, Zudin Puthucheary, Maurizio Cecconi, Brigitta Fazzini, Hannah Malcolm, Peter Nydahl, Magda Osman, Alessandro Santini, Stefan J Schaller, William Thomson, Danielle van den Berke, Marcel Poll, Timothy Stephens
{"title":"Uncertainty and decision-making in critical care: lessons from managing COVID-19 ARDS in preparation for the next pandemic.","authors":"Kenki Matsumoto, John R Prowle, Zudin Puthucheary, Maurizio Cecconi, Brigitta Fazzini, Hannah Malcolm, Peter Nydahl, Magda Osman, Alessandro Santini, Stefan J Schaller, William Thomson, Danielle van den Berke, Marcel Poll, Timothy Stephens","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was an emergent syndrome that led to high volumes of critically ill ventilated patients. We explored influences on decision-making regarding management of COVID-19 ARDS mechanical ventilation to identify modifiable factors to improve preparedness for future pandemics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and small group interviews informed the development of an international questionnaire (UK, Italy, Germany and Netherlands) on factors influencing COVID-19 ARDS ventilation decision-making in critical care professionals. Participants ranked four themes in order of importance: disease (uncertainties around COVID-19 ARDS), contextual (cognitive strain), environmental (structural logistics) and team factors. Participants also ranked the subthemes within each theme. Thematic analysis was used to derive findings from qualitative data. Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U and Kendall's tau were used for quantitative data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient factors (comorbidities, clinical/biochemical parameters) were the most studied influences in the extant literature on decision-making; uncertainty was one of the least studied. 371 critical care professionals responded to the questionnaire. Disease uncertainty (lack of applicable guidelines, unfamiliarity with pathophysiology) was ranked as the most important influence on ventilation decision-making for COVID-19 ARDS across regions, professions and experience levels (p<0.001). Participants expressed underconfidence in their decision-making (median score: 9/20); this was unaffected by experience (p=0.79) or profession (p=0.58). Qualitative findings supported and extended the initial proposed influences, including the impact of team factors (+ve) and resource limitations (-ve) on disease uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future pandemic preparedness programmes should target modifiable influences such as information sharing, teamworking and resource limitations to mitigate against the negative influence of uncertainty and thereby improve decision-making overall.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002637","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was an emergent syndrome that led to high volumes of critically ill ventilated patients. We explored influences on decision-making regarding management of COVID-19 ARDS mechanical ventilation to identify modifiable factors to improve preparedness for future pandemics.

Methods: A systematic review and small group interviews informed the development of an international questionnaire (UK, Italy, Germany and Netherlands) on factors influencing COVID-19 ARDS ventilation decision-making in critical care professionals. Participants ranked four themes in order of importance: disease (uncertainties around COVID-19 ARDS), contextual (cognitive strain), environmental (structural logistics) and team factors. Participants also ranked the subthemes within each theme. Thematic analysis was used to derive findings from qualitative data. Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U and Kendall's tau were used for quantitative data analysis.

Results: Patient factors (comorbidities, clinical/biochemical parameters) were the most studied influences in the extant literature on decision-making; uncertainty was one of the least studied. 371 critical care professionals responded to the questionnaire. Disease uncertainty (lack of applicable guidelines, unfamiliarity with pathophysiology) was ranked as the most important influence on ventilation decision-making for COVID-19 ARDS across regions, professions and experience levels (p<0.001). Participants expressed underconfidence in their decision-making (median score: 9/20); this was unaffected by experience (p=0.79) or profession (p=0.58). Qualitative findings supported and extended the initial proposed influences, including the impact of team factors (+ve) and resource limitations (-ve) on disease uncertainty.

Conclusion: Future pandemic preparedness programmes should target modifiable influences such as information sharing, teamworking and resource limitations to mitigate against the negative influence of uncertainty and thereby improve decision-making overall.

重症监护中的不确定性和决策:管理COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征为下一次大流行做准备的经验教训
目的:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是一种导致大量危重通气患者的紧急综合征。我们探讨了对COVID-19 ARDS机械通气管理决策的影响,以确定可修改的因素,以提高对未来大流行的准备。方法:通过系统回顾和小组访谈,编制了一份国际调查问卷(英国、意大利、德国和荷兰),调查影响重症监护专业人员COVID-19 ARDS通气决策的因素。参与者按照重要性对四个主题进行了排序:疾病(COVID-19 ARDS的不确定性)、情境(认知压力)、环境(结构物流)和团队因素。参与者还对每个主题中的子主题进行了排序。专题分析用于从定性数据中得出结论。采用Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U和Kendall的tau进行定量数据分析。结果:在现有文献中,患者因素(合并症、临床/生化参数)对决策的影响研究最多;不确定性是最少被研究的问题之一。371名重症监护专业人员参与了问卷调查。疾病不确定性(缺乏适用的指南,不熟悉病理生理学)被列为影响COVID-19 ARDS通气决策的最重要因素,涉及地区、专业和经验水平。结论:未来的大流行防范规划应针对可修改的影响,如信息共享、团队合作和资源限制,以减轻不确定性的负面影响,从而改善整体决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信