Davide Ippolito, Cesare Maino, Lionel Arrivé, Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah, Roberto Cannella, Alessandro Furlan, Aristeidis Grigoriadis, Martina Pezzullo, Sarah Pöetter Lang, Sabine Schmidt Kobbe, Federica Vernuccio, Maria Antonietta Bali
{"title":"ESGAR consensus statement on MR imaging in primary sclerosing cholangitis.","authors":"Davide Ippolito, Cesare Maino, Lionel Arrivé, Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah, Roberto Cannella, Alessandro Furlan, Aristeidis Grigoriadis, Martina Pezzullo, Sarah Pöetter Lang, Sabine Schmidt Kobbe, Federica Vernuccio, Maria Antonietta Bali","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11583-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide a consensus statement and recommendations on MR imaging in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) convened a multinational European panel of experts selected based on a literature review and their leadership in the field. A modified Delphi process was adopted to draft a list of statements. For each statement, the panelists indicated the level of agreement using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 means \"no agreement,\" 2 means \"poor agreement,\" 3 means \"slight agreement,\" 4 means \"fair agreement,\" and 5 means \"complete agreement.\" The median score for each statement was collected. The level of evidence was reported according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Descriptive statistics were used to rate agreement levels and the consensus' internal reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 12 voting committee members were from Italy (n = 4, 33.4%), Austria (n = 2, 16.7%), Sweden (n = 1, 8.3%), France (n = 1, 8.3%), the United States (n = 1, 8.3%), Switzerland (n = 1, 8.3%), and Belgium (n = 2, 16.7%). The final questionnaire consisted of 55 statements. The agreement reached by the expert panel was complete for 23 statements (41.8%), fair for 16 (29.1%), slight for 15 (27.2%), and poor for 1 (1.9%). Statements that received complete agreement were used to structure a reporting template.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This statement paper recommends how and when to perform MRI in PSC patients. A structured reporting template has been created to improve quality care and communication among radiologists and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question A standard MR protocol and the most common imaging features to be reported are fundamental for the correct evaluation of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients. Findings Twelve expert radiologists reported which are the most important imaging features and how and when to perform MR in PSC patients. Clinical relevance The identified statements reported in this paper and the structured reporting template are useful for radiologists and clinicians to help correctly manage PSC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"6495-6506"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11583-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To provide a consensus statement and recommendations on MR imaging in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).
Methods: The European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) convened a multinational European panel of experts selected based on a literature review and their leadership in the field. A modified Delphi process was adopted to draft a list of statements. For each statement, the panelists indicated the level of agreement using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 means "no agreement," 2 means "poor agreement," 3 means "slight agreement," 4 means "fair agreement," and 5 means "complete agreement." The median score for each statement was collected. The level of evidence was reported according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Descriptive statistics were used to rate agreement levels and the consensus' internal reliability.
Results: The 12 voting committee members were from Italy (n = 4, 33.4%), Austria (n = 2, 16.7%), Sweden (n = 1, 8.3%), France (n = 1, 8.3%), the United States (n = 1, 8.3%), Switzerland (n = 1, 8.3%), and Belgium (n = 2, 16.7%). The final questionnaire consisted of 55 statements. The agreement reached by the expert panel was complete for 23 statements (41.8%), fair for 16 (29.1%), slight for 15 (27.2%), and poor for 1 (1.9%). Statements that received complete agreement were used to structure a reporting template.
Conclusions: This statement paper recommends how and when to perform MRI in PSC patients. A structured reporting template has been created to improve quality care and communication among radiologists and clinicians.
Key points: Question A standard MR protocol and the most common imaging features to be reported are fundamental for the correct evaluation of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients. Findings Twelve expert radiologists reported which are the most important imaging features and how and when to perform MR in PSC patients. Clinical relevance The identified statements reported in this paper and the structured reporting template are useful for radiologists and clinicians to help correctly manage PSC patients.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.