Hair density response to photobiomodulation in canine alopecia X is measured reliably with an ordinal scale: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study.
Dalia Aoudj, Jérôme R E Del Castillo, Camylle C Bergeron, Gabrielle Brosseau, Caroline de Jaham, Marie-Odile Benoit-Biancamano, Nadia Pagé
{"title":"Hair density response to photobiomodulation in canine alopecia X is measured reliably with an ordinal scale: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study.","authors":"Dalia Aoudj, Jérôme R E Del Castillo, Camylle C Bergeron, Gabrielle Brosseau, Caroline de Jaham, Marie-Odile Benoit-Biancamano, Nadia Pagé","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.25.01.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop an ordinal hair density score (HDS), determine its inter-rater agreement, and use it in a trial of photobiomodulation as a sole treatment for alopecia X.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 5-level ordinal HDS system was developed. Four blinded veterinary dermatologists independently graded a 50-image reference set using the HDS. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using the quadratic-weighted Fleiss κ, Brennan-Prediger, and Gwet AC2 coefficients. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was performed using a convenience sample of alopecia X dogs recruited based on inclusion and exclusion criteria over 16 months. Photoconverter gels were applied on both alopecic sides of each patient once per week for 8 weeks. One randomly chosen side was exposed to excitatory light (active treatment) but not the other (sham). Skin biopsies were taken from the center of each treated side before and at the end of the study. The images of active and sham sides acquired before the study, at day 50, and at the end of the study were graded using the HDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-rater agreement coefficients were greater or equal to 0.81. Seven dogs were enrolled, but 1 withdrew after day 50. Hair density score evolved over time in both sides, but the OR of improved HDS increased with time only for the 3 central HDS grades. Histopathology revealed no notable differences between sides and across time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HDS seems valid and useful in assessing the effect of photobiomodulation on the exposed areas of our alopecia X patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This novel, easily applicable scale may facilitate the therapeutic monitoring of alopecia in dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.01.0034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To develop an ordinal hair density score (HDS), determine its inter-rater agreement, and use it in a trial of photobiomodulation as a sole treatment for alopecia X.
Methods: A 5-level ordinal HDS system was developed. Four blinded veterinary dermatologists independently graded a 50-image reference set using the HDS. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using the quadratic-weighted Fleiss κ, Brennan-Prediger, and Gwet AC2 coefficients. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was performed using a convenience sample of alopecia X dogs recruited based on inclusion and exclusion criteria over 16 months. Photoconverter gels were applied on both alopecic sides of each patient once per week for 8 weeks. One randomly chosen side was exposed to excitatory light (active treatment) but not the other (sham). Skin biopsies were taken from the center of each treated side before and at the end of the study. The images of active and sham sides acquired before the study, at day 50, and at the end of the study were graded using the HDS.
Results: Inter-rater agreement coefficients were greater or equal to 0.81. Seven dogs were enrolled, but 1 withdrew after day 50. Hair density score evolved over time in both sides, but the OR of improved HDS increased with time only for the 3 central HDS grades. Histopathology revealed no notable differences between sides and across time.
Conclusions: The HDS seems valid and useful in assessing the effect of photobiomodulation on the exposed areas of our alopecia X patients.
Clinical relevance: This novel, easily applicable scale may facilitate the therapeutic monitoring of alopecia in dogs.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.