Hair density response to photobiomodulation in canine alopecia X is measured reliably with an ordinal scale: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study.

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Dalia Aoudj, Jérôme R E Del Castillo, Camylle C Bergeron, Gabrielle Brosseau, Caroline de Jaham, Marie-Odile Benoit-Biancamano, Nadia Pagé
{"title":"Hair density response to photobiomodulation in canine alopecia X is measured reliably with an ordinal scale: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study.","authors":"Dalia Aoudj, Jérôme R E Del Castillo, Camylle C Bergeron, Gabrielle Brosseau, Caroline de Jaham, Marie-Odile Benoit-Biancamano, Nadia Pagé","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.25.01.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop an ordinal hair density score (HDS), determine its inter-rater agreement, and use it in a trial of photobiomodulation as a sole treatment for alopecia X.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 5-level ordinal HDS system was developed. Four blinded veterinary dermatologists independently graded a 50-image reference set using the HDS. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using the quadratic-weighted Fleiss κ, Brennan-Prediger, and Gwet AC2 coefficients. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was performed using a convenience sample of alopecia X dogs recruited based on inclusion and exclusion criteria over 16 months. Photoconverter gels were applied on both alopecic sides of each patient once per week for 8 weeks. One randomly chosen side was exposed to excitatory light (active treatment) but not the other (sham). Skin biopsies were taken from the center of each treated side before and at the end of the study. The images of active and sham sides acquired before the study, at day 50, and at the end of the study were graded using the HDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-rater agreement coefficients were greater or equal to 0.81. Seven dogs were enrolled, but 1 withdrew after day 50. Hair density score evolved over time in both sides, but the OR of improved HDS increased with time only for the 3 central HDS grades. Histopathology revealed no notable differences between sides and across time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HDS seems valid and useful in assessing the effect of photobiomodulation on the exposed areas of our alopecia X patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This novel, easily applicable scale may facilitate the therapeutic monitoring of alopecia in dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.01.0034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop an ordinal hair density score (HDS), determine its inter-rater agreement, and use it in a trial of photobiomodulation as a sole treatment for alopecia X.

Methods: A 5-level ordinal HDS system was developed. Four blinded veterinary dermatologists independently graded a 50-image reference set using the HDS. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using the quadratic-weighted Fleiss κ, Brennan-Prediger, and Gwet AC2 coefficients. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was performed using a convenience sample of alopecia X dogs recruited based on inclusion and exclusion criteria over 16 months. Photoconverter gels were applied on both alopecic sides of each patient once per week for 8 weeks. One randomly chosen side was exposed to excitatory light (active treatment) but not the other (sham). Skin biopsies were taken from the center of each treated side before and at the end of the study. The images of active and sham sides acquired before the study, at day 50, and at the end of the study were graded using the HDS.

Results: Inter-rater agreement coefficients were greater or equal to 0.81. Seven dogs were enrolled, but 1 withdrew after day 50. Hair density score evolved over time in both sides, but the OR of improved HDS increased with time only for the 3 central HDS grades. Histopathology revealed no notable differences between sides and across time.

Conclusions: The HDS seems valid and useful in assessing the effect of photobiomodulation on the exposed areas of our alopecia X patients.

Clinical relevance: This novel, easily applicable scale may facilitate the therapeutic monitoring of alopecia in dogs.

毛发密度对犬X型脱发光生物调节的反应用有序量表可靠地测量:一项随机、对照、双盲研究。
目的:建立有序发密度评分(HDS),确定其等级间的一致性,并将其用于光生物调节作为脱发x的单一治疗试验。方法:建立一个5级有序发密度评分系统。四名盲法兽医皮肤科医生使用HDS对50幅图像的参考集进行独立评分。使用二次加权Fleiss κ、Brennan-Prediger和Gwet AC2系数评估评分间一致性。在16个月的时间里,根据纳入和排除标准招募了一批X型脱发犬,进行了一项双盲、随机、对照试验。每例患者秃发两侧应用光转换凝胶,每周1次,共8周。随机选择一侧暴露在兴奋光下(积极治疗),而另一侧不暴露(假治疗)。在研究前和研究结束时,分别从每个治疗侧的中心进行皮肤活检。使用HDS对研究前、第50天和研究结束时获得的活性侧和假侧图像进行评分。结果:评价间一致系数大于等于0.81。7只狗被招募,但1只在第50天退出。双方的毛发密度评分随时间而变化,但仅在3个中心HDS等级中,改善HDS的OR随时间而增加。组织病理学显示两侧及时间间无显著差异。结论:HDS在评估光生物调节对X型脱发患者暴露部位的影响方面是有效和有用的。临床意义:这种新颖,易于应用的量表可以促进狗脱发的治疗监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信