Opioid-free anesthesia in bariatric surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Christine Dagher, Rhea Mattar, Marie Aoun, Joanna Tohme, Nicole Naccache, Hicham Jabbour
{"title":"Opioid-free anesthesia in bariatric surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Christine Dagher, Rhea Mattar, Marie Aoun, Joanna Tohme, Nicole Naccache, Hicham Jabbour","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-02565-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bariatric surgeries are increasingly used to manage obesity, presenting significant perioperative challenges, especially with opioid use. Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA) is a multimodal technique to address these issues. This study aims to compare the effects of OFA and traditional Opioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA) on postoperative morphine consumption, hemodynamics, pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), sedation, and patient satisfaction in bariatric surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective controlled study was conducted in the operating room of a tertiary university hospital. It included patients aged between 18 and 65 years undergoing bariatric surgery. 58 obese patients were divided into two groups: 32 received OBA and 26 received OFA. The OFA regimen included lidocaine, ketamine, magnesium sulfate, dexmedetomidine, and dexamethasone. Main outcome measures included postoperative morphine consumption in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), 24 and 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic parameters, sedation score, pain score, presence of nausea and/or vomiting, and overall patient satisfaction evaluated at 48 h postoperatively or before hospital discharge were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OFA significantly reduced postoperative morphine consumption (median dose of 8 mg vs.19 mg, p = 0.000). Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain at rest, during movement, and during coughing were significantly lower in the OFA group. Both groups were hemodynamically stable perioperatively. There was no significant difference in PONV incidence or sedation levels between the groups in the PACU, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Patient satisfaction was higher in the OFA group, with 65% reporting a satisfaction score of ≥ 8/10 compared to 28% in the OBA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OFA reduces postoperative morphine consumption and improves pain management without compromising hemodynamic stability or increasing sedation. Furthermore, the incidence of PONV was not significantly different and overall patient satisfaction was higher with OFA. These findings support the use of OFA in bariatric surgery, despite the need for further studies with larger sample sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02565-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bariatric surgeries are increasingly used to manage obesity, presenting significant perioperative challenges, especially with opioid use. Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA) is a multimodal technique to address these issues. This study aims to compare the effects of OFA and traditional Opioid-Based Anesthesia (OBA) on postoperative morphine consumption, hemodynamics, pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), sedation, and patient satisfaction in bariatric surgery.

Methods: A prospective controlled study was conducted in the operating room of a tertiary university hospital. It included patients aged between 18 and 65 years undergoing bariatric surgery. 58 obese patients were divided into two groups: 32 received OBA and 26 received OFA. The OFA regimen included lidocaine, ketamine, magnesium sulfate, dexmedetomidine, and dexamethasone. Main outcome measures included postoperative morphine consumption in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), 24 and 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic parameters, sedation score, pain score, presence of nausea and/or vomiting, and overall patient satisfaction evaluated at 48 h postoperatively or before hospital discharge were recorded.

Results: OFA significantly reduced postoperative morphine consumption (median dose of 8 mg vs.19 mg, p = 0.000). Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain at rest, during movement, and during coughing were significantly lower in the OFA group. Both groups were hemodynamically stable perioperatively. There was no significant difference in PONV incidence or sedation levels between the groups in the PACU, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Patient satisfaction was higher in the OFA group, with 65% reporting a satisfaction score of ≥ 8/10 compared to 28% in the OBA group.

Conclusions: OFA reduces postoperative morphine consumption and improves pain management without compromising hemodynamic stability or increasing sedation. Furthermore, the incidence of PONV was not significantly different and overall patient satisfaction was higher with OFA. These findings support the use of OFA in bariatric surgery, despite the need for further studies with larger sample sizes.

减肥手术中无阿片类药物麻醉:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
背景:减肥手术越来越多地用于控制肥胖,提出了重大的围手术期挑战,特别是阿片类药物的使用。无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA)是解决这些问题的一种多模式技术。本研究旨在比较OFA和传统阿片类药物麻醉(OBA)对减肥手术术后吗啡消耗、血流动力学、疼痛、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)、镇静和患者满意度的影响。方法:在某三级大学附属医院的手术室进行前瞻性对照研究。它包括年龄在18岁到65岁之间接受减肥手术的患者。58例肥胖患者分为两组:接受OBA治疗32例,OFA治疗26例。OFA方案包括利多卡因、氯胺酮、硫酸镁、右美托咪定和地塞米松。主要结局指标包括术后24和48小时麻醉后护理病房(PACU)吗啡用量。次要结局包括血流动力学参数、镇静评分、疼痛评分、恶心和/或呕吐的存在,以及在术后48小时或出院前评估的患者总体满意度。结果:OFA显著减少了术后吗啡的消耗(中位剂量为8 mg vs.19 mg, p = 0.000)。视觉模拟量表(VAS)在休息、运动和咳嗽时的疼痛评分明显低于OFA组。两组围手术期血流动力学稳定。术后24和48 h, PACU组间PONV发生率和镇静水平无显著差异。OFA组的患者满意度更高,65%的患者报告满意度评分≥8/10,而OBA组的满意度为28%。结论:OFA减少了术后吗啡的消耗,在不影响血流动力学稳定性或增加镇静作用的情况下改善了疼痛管理。此外,PONV的发生率无显著性差异,OFA的总体患者满意度更高。这些发现支持OFA在减肥手术中的应用,尽管需要进一步的大样本量研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信