Feasibility and efficacy of a group intervention to develop social support and resilience in family members of individuals with TBI.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Robin A Hanks, Grahame Simpson, Brigid Waldron Perrine, Lisa J Rapport, Robert Kotasek, Scott Millis
{"title":"Feasibility and efficacy of a group intervention to develop social support and resilience in family members of individuals with TBI.","authors":"Robin A Hanks, Grahame Simpson, Brigid Waldron Perrine, Lisa J Rapport, Robert Kotasek, Scott Millis","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2491787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the clinical utility of the Strength 2 Strength (S2S) program to compare the effectiveness of a 1-day intensive intervention to the 5-week intervention, with regard to improving resilience and social support in families and friends of persons with TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-three participants received the 1-day, 5-h intervention, and 32 participants received the 5-week, 2-h intervention. Eighteen participants were waitlist controls. Outcome measures included the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Family Resilience Scale, Social Provision Scale, and a 6-item questionnaire to assess satisfaction with the intervention and self-care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility and efficacy of the S2S intervention was demonstrated. It did not increase resilience, but it kept social support stable during the COVID-19 pandemic. The control group showed decreases in social support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical utility of the program in friends and families of those with TBI was evident and prevented deterioration in social support. Participant satisfaction was supported by the small attrition rate. Similar effects were associated with the brief and longer versions of the intervention, indicating that this type of intervention was carried out in an efficient manner for those who are already struggling to juggle the many needs of being a care partner.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2025.2491787","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the clinical utility of the Strength 2 Strength (S2S) program to compare the effectiveness of a 1-day intensive intervention to the 5-week intervention, with regard to improving resilience and social support in families and friends of persons with TBI.

Methods: Thirty-three participants received the 1-day, 5-h intervention, and 32 participants received the 5-week, 2-h intervention. Eighteen participants were waitlist controls. Outcome measures included the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Family Resilience Scale, Social Provision Scale, and a 6-item questionnaire to assess satisfaction with the intervention and self-care.

Results: Feasibility and efficacy of the S2S intervention was demonstrated. It did not increase resilience, but it kept social support stable during the COVID-19 pandemic. The control group showed decreases in social support.

Conclusions: Clinical utility of the program in friends and families of those with TBI was evident and prevented deterioration in social support. Participant satisfaction was supported by the small attrition rate. Similar effects were associated with the brief and longer versions of the intervention, indicating that this type of intervention was carried out in an efficient manner for those who are already struggling to juggle the many needs of being a care partner.

团体干预对TBI患者家庭成员社会支持和恢复力发展的可行性和有效性。
目的:评估强度2强度(S2S)计划的临床应用,比较1天强化干预与5周干预在改善创伤性脑损伤患者的家庭和朋友的恢复力和社会支持方面的有效性。方法:33名受试者接受1天5小时的干预,32名受试者接受5周2小时的干预。18名参与者是候补组。结果测量包括康纳-戴维森恢复力量表、家庭恢复力量表、社会提供量表和一份6项调查问卷,以评估干预和自我保健的满意度。结果:验证了S2S干预的可行性和有效性。它没有增强抵御力,但在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间保持了社会支持的稳定。对照组的社会支持有所减少。结论:该计划在TBI患者的朋友和家人中的临床应用是明显的,并防止了社会支持的恶化。参与者的满意度得到了低流失率的支持。类似的效果与短期和较长版本的干预有关,这表明这种类型的干预对那些已经在努力处理作为护理伙伴的许多需求的人来说是一种有效的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信